Literature DB >> 22577648

Socket preservation using bovine bone mineral and collagen membrane: a randomized controlled clinical trial with histologic analysis.

Daniele Cardaropoli1, Lorenzo Tamagnone, Alessandro Roffredo, Lorena Gaveglio, Giuseppe Cardaropoli.   

Abstract

After tooth extraction, varying amounts of bone resorption occur because of qualitative and quantitative changes at the edentulous site of the alveolar process. The aims of this randomized controlled clinical trial were (1) to compare the postextraction changes in residual ridge dimensions during spontaneous healing with those during socket preservation, (2) to analyze the histologic and histomorphometric aspects of the grafted sockets, and (3) to compare probing procket depth (PPD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) changes at teeth adjacent to extraction sites. Forty-eight teeth were extracted from 41 patients referred for extraction of 1 or more maxillary or mandibular premolars or molars. The edentulous sites were randomly assigned to the control (EXT, extraction alone) or experimental groups (SP, extraction and socket preservation). In the SP group, the sockets were filled with bovine bone mineral and covered with porcine collagen membrane. At baseline and after 4 months, PPD, gingival recession (REC), and CAL were measured at teeth adjacent to the edentulous sites. The changes in ridge dimensions from baseline to 4 months were assessed on dental casts. At 4 months, bone was harvested from the grafted areas in the SP group and the edentulous areas in the EXT group. PPD, REC, and CAL were comparable between groups. However, from baseline to 4 months, the SP group showed significantly less reduction in ridge width (1.04 ± 1.08 mm vs 4.48 ± 0.65 mm, P < .001) and height (0.46 ± 0.46 mm vs 1.54 ± 0.33 mm, P < .001). Histologically, the grafted sockets exhibited various stages of bone maturation and formation without inflammatory responses. No significant difference in the mineralized and nonmineralized fractions was noted between the groups. Socket preservation using bovine bone mineral and porcine collagen membrane considerably limits the amount of horizontal and vertical bone resorption when compared with extraction alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22577648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent        ISSN: 0198-7569            Impact factor:   1.840


  33 in total

1.  Guided bone regeneration in calvarial critical size bony defect using a double-layer resorbable collagen membrane covering a xenograft: a histological and histomorphometric study in rats.

Authors:  Roy Abou Fadel; Rawad Samarani; Carole Chakar
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-04-14

2.  Determinants of alveolar ridge preservation differ by anatomic location.

Authors:  Binnaz Leblebicioglu; Mabel Salas; Yirae Ort; Ashley Johnson; Vedat O Yildiz; Do-Gyoon Kim; Sudha Agarwal; Dimitris N Tatakis
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 8.728

Review 3.  Effect of alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  G Avila-Ortiz; S Elangovan; K W O Kramer; D Blanchette; D V Dawson
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  Effect of flapless ridge preservation with two different alloplastic materials in sockets with buccal dehiscence defects-volumetric and linear changes.

Authors:  Nadja Naenni; Vitor Sapata; Stefan P Bienz; Minas Leventis; Ronald E Jung; Christoph H F Hämmerle; Daniel S Thoma
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 5.  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development.

Authors:  Momen A Atieh; Nabeel H M Alsabeeha; Alan G T Payne; Warwick Duncan; Clovis M Faggion; Marco Esposito
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-05-28

6.  Marginal Bone Resorption Around Dental Implants Placed in Alveolar Socket Preserved Sites: A 5 Years Follow-up Study.

Authors:  Mario Beretta; Carlo Maiorana; Mattia Manfredini; Fabrizio Signorino; Pier Paolo Poli; Raffaele Vinci
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-04-18

7.  Histological and histomorphometric evaluation of alveolar ridge preservation using an allograft and nonresorbable membrane with and without primary closure: A pilot randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Majdi A Aladmawy; Zuhair S Natto; Michael Kreitzer; Yumi Ogata; Yong Hur
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 8.  Dimensional and histomorphometric evaluation of biomaterials used for alveolar ridge preservation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  L Canullo; M Del Fabbro; S Khijmatgar; S Panda; A Ravidà; G Tommasato; A Sculean; P Pesce
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 9.  Regenerative Medicine for Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases.

Authors:  L Larsson; A M Decker; L Nibali; S P Pilipchuk; T Berglundh; W V Giannobile
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 6.116

10.  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development.

Authors:  Momen A Atieh; Nabeel Hm Alsabeeha; Alan Gt Payne; Sara Ali; Clovis M Jr Faggion; Marco Esposito
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.