Literature DB >> 30240650

Cesarean scar defect: a prospective study on risk factors.

Riitta M Antila-Långsjö1, Johanna U Mäenpää2, Heini S Huhtala3, Eija I Tomás4, Synnöve M Staff5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cesarean scar defect (isthmocele) is a known complication after cesarean delivery. It has become more common due to a rising cesarean delivery rate. Isthmocele has been associated with various gynecological and obstetric problems such as uterine rupture, cesarean scar pregnancy, and bleeding disorders.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to prospectively investigate factors associated with the risk for isthmocele assessed by sonohysterography. STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective observational cohort study was conducted in 401 nonpregnant women who were recruited within 3 days of cesarean delivery. Women were evaluated with sonohysterography 6 months after cesarean delivery to detect a possible isthmocele. The ultrasonographer was blinded to any clinical information. The main outcome measure was the presence of isthmocele. Type of surgery (elective vs emergency), maternal background variables, and factors related to pregnancy, labor, and postoperative recovery were analyzed in relation to isthmocele. A logistic regression model was used to assess independent risk factors from univariate analysis.
RESULTS: In all, 371 women were examined with sonohysterography resulting in a follow-up rate of 92.5%. The prevalence of isthmocele was 45.6%. Independent risk factors for isthmocele development were a history of gestational diabetes (odds ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-2.92; P = .042), previous cesarean delivery (odds ratio, 3.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.90-5.17; P < .001), and advanced maternal body mass index (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.11; P = .012). Every additional unit of body mass index increased the risk of isthmocele by 6%. In the subgroup of emergency cesarean delivery, longer duration of active labor increased the risk for isthmocele (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.11; P = .032). There was no statistically significant difference in prevalence between the groups of elective and emergency cesarean delivery (P = .898).
CONCLUSION: Based on sonohysterographic examination, maternal body mass index, gestational diabetes, and previous cesarean deliveries are associated with an increased risk for incomplete healing of the uterine incision.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cesarean delivery; cesarean scar defect; isthmocele; sonohysterography; ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30240650     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  14 in total

Review 1.  The role of extracellular matrix in normal and pathological pregnancy: Future applications of microphysiological systems in reproductive medicine.

Authors:  Blakely B O'Connor; Benjamin D Pope; Michael M Peters; Carrie Ris-Stalpers; Kevin K Parker
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2020-07-08

Review 2.  Post-caesarean Niche (Isthmocele) in Uterine Scar: An Update.

Authors:  Vidushi Kulshrestha; Nutan Agarwal; Garima Kachhawa
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2020-09-21

3.  Comparative Study of USG and MRI in Evaluation of Isthmocele.

Authors:  Taru Gupta; Khushbu Singal; Nupur Gupta; Supreeti Kohli; Monica Kanyal
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2021-02-17

4.  Laparoscopic management of a full-thickness uterine niche with subsequent pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  D Z Kasapoglu; L Y O Tang; R A Kadir; F Shakir
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2021-12

5.  Risk factors for poor hemostasis of prophylactic uterine artery embolization before curettage in cesarean scar pregnancy.

Authors:  Hongan Tian; Shunzhen Li; Wanwan Jia; Kaihu Yu; Guangyao Wu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  Transplantation of human amniotic epithelial cells promotes morphological and functional regeneration in a rat uterine scar model.

Authors:  Yihui Fan; Junyan Sun; Qiuwan Zhang; Dongmei Lai
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 6.832

7.  Potential risk factors for caesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  B Gull; V Klerelid; A Jormeus; A Strandell
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2021-05-01

8.  Analysis of risk factors for cesarean scar diverticulum: A STROBE-compliant case-control study.

Authors:  Songjun Liu; Linlin Chen; Guang Zhu; Yupei Shao; Shuqian Yu; Wu Li; Wen Lv
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus hysteroscopic approach in patients with previous cesarean scar defect: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Lei Lei; Aiqian Zhang; Lingxiao Zou; Dabao Xu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-10

10.  Identifying possible risk factors for cesarean scar pregnancy based on a retrospective study of 291 cases.

Authors:  XianYi Zhou; Hua Li; XiaoDong Fu
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 1.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.