| Literature DB >> 34401685 |
Anita Raj1, Nabamallika Dehingia1,2, Abhishek Singh3, Julian McAuley4, Lotus McDougal1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Machine learning techniques can explore low prevalence data to offer insight into identification of factors associated with non-marital sexual violence (NMSV). NMSV in India is a health and human rights concern that disproportionately affects adolescents, is under-reported, and not well understood or addressed in the country.Entities:
Keywords: Gender-based violence; India; Machine learning; Sexual violence
Year: 2021 PMID: 34401685 PMCID: PMC8350001 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101046
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EClinicalMedicine ISSN: 2589-5370
Sample characteristics of participants.
| Total sample (15–49 years old) ( | Sub-sample of women (15–49 years) who experienced NMSV ( | Sub-sample of women (15–49 years) who did not experience NMSV ( | Sub-sample of never married adolescent girls (15–19 years) ( | Sub-sample of women (15–49 years) who experienced NMSV ( | Sub-sample of women (15–19 years) who did not experience NMSV ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristics | %/Mean (Std. err) | %/Mean (Std. err) | %/Mean (Std. err) | %/Mean (Std. err) | ||||
| Current age | 30.04 (0.06) | 29.05 (0.68) | 30.04 (0.06) | 0.818 | 16.72 (0.02) | 16.74 (0.25) | 16.72 (0.02) | 0.947 |
| Years of schooling | 7.01 (0.03) | 7.12 (0.32) | 7.01 (0.03) | 0.564 | 9.22 (0.05) | 9.27 (0.36) | 9.22 (0.05) | 0.908 |
| Marital status | ||||||||
| Never married | 22.35% | 30.37% | 22.22% | 0.000 | 100% | 100% | 100% | - |
| Currently married | 73.35% | 62.66% | 73.53% | - | - | - | ||
| Widowed/Divorced/Separated | 4.30% | 6.97% | 4.25% | - | - | - | ||
| Wealth index status: | ||||||||
| Poorest | 16.50% | 20.41% | 16.44% | 0.061 | 18.20% | 15.92% | 18.19% | 0.106 |
| Poorer | 19.13% | 20.52% | 19.11% | 21.24% | 21.66% | 21.27% | ||
| Middle | 20.50% | 22.83% | 20.47% | 20.14% | 23.88% | 20.08% | ||
| Richer | 21.45% | 15.10% | 21.53% | 20.57% | 7.42% | 20.75% | ||
| Richest | 22.43% | 21.14% | 22.44% | 19.86% | 3.11% | 19.70% | ||
| Place of residence: | ||||||||
| Urban | 35.52% | 41.08% | 35.45% | 0.075 | 33.29% | 45.88% | 33.02% | 0.099 |
| Rural | 64.48% | 58.92% | 64.55% | 66.71% | 54.12% | 66.98% | ||
| Religion | ||||||||
| Muslim | 14.28% | 11.16% | 14.33% | 0.170 | 16.74% | 5.46% | 16.98% | 0.003 |
| Hindu | 80.27% | 84.12% | 80.22% | 78.08% | 91.32% | 77.90% | ||
| Others | 5.45% | 4.71% | 5.46% | 5.18% | 3.22% | 5.13% | ||
| Caste | ||||||||
| SC/ST | 29.89% | 39.81% | 29.76% | 0.005 | 30.58% | 32.46% | 30.52% | 0.228 |
| OBC | 45.90% | 38.19% | 46.00% | 46.17% | 34.40% | 46.45% | ||
| Other caste/General | 24.21% | 22.00% | 24.24% | 23.25% | 33.14% | 23.03% | ||
| Region of residence | ||||||||
| North | 13.83% | 6.12% | 13.94% | 0.000 | 14.15% | 4.62% | 14.38% | 0.098 |
| West | 15.49% | 10.96% | 15.55% | 15.73% | 13.06% | 15.81% | ||
| South | 23.27% | 38.20% | 23.07% | 18.90% | 31.67% | 18.50% | ||
| Northeast | 3.46% | 2.12% | 3.48% | 3.11% | 1.50% | 3.03% | ||
| East | 21.75% | 22.09% | 21.74% | 21.43% | 25.45% | 21.39% | ||
| Central | 22.19% | 20.51% | 22.21% | 26.69% | 23.72% | 26.87% | ||
| Told someone or sought help from anyone (among those who experienced sexual violence) | ||||||||
| Yes | - | 32.00% | - | - | 28.67% | - | ||
| No | - | 68.00% | - | - | 71.33% | - | ||
| Person from whom the victim sought help (among those who experienced sexual violence) | ||||||||
| Own family | - | 20.14% | - | - | 15.74% | - | ||
| Husband/partner family | - | 6.20% | - | - | 0.00% | - | ||
| Current/former boyfriend | - | 0.20% | - | - | 0.13% | - | ||
| Neighbour | - | 1.66% | - | - | 0.00% | - | ||
| Social service organization | - | 1.38% | - | - | 6.05% | - | ||
| Friend | - | 6.56% | - | - | 5.60% | - | ||
| Police | - | 1.45% | - | - | 0.42% | - | ||
| Religious leader | - | 0.66% | - | - | 0.00% | - | ||
| Lawyer | - | 0.11% | - | - | 0.04% | - | ||
| Doctor | - | 0.00% | - | - | 0.00% | - | ||
| Others | - | 0.68% | - | - | 2.14% | - | ||
| Relationship to perpetrator for first instance of sexual violence (among those who experienced sexual violence) | ||||||||
| Current or former boyfriend/husband | - | 44.63% | - | - | 1.68% | - | ||
| Current or former boyfriend | - | 5.90% | - | - | 16.79% | - | ||
| Father or step-father | - | 3.07% | - | - | 2.14% | - | ||
| Brother or step-brother | - | 2.60% | - | - | 7.45% | - | ||
| Other relatives | - | 23.73% | - | - | 27.16% | - | ||
| In-laws | - | 1.89% | - | - | 0.98% | - | ||
| Own friends or acquaintances | - | 5.55% | - | - | 13.31% | - | ||
| Family friend | - | 7.08% | - | - | 14.31% | - | ||
| Teacher | - | 1.65% | - | - | 4.61% | - | ||
| Employer or someone at work | - | 1.18% | - | - | 0.001% | - | ||
| Stranger | - | 4.37% | - | - | 5.60% | - | ||
| Others | - | 3.66% | - | - | 5.95% | - |
Identified predictors for corresponding themes from the iterative thematic analysis (ITA) for complete sample of women of age 15–49 years old.
| Experiences of/Exposure to Violence | Geography | Health care access/use | Economic Circumstances/ Engagement/ Empowerment | Household agency | Maternal health | Sexual behaviour | Knowledge of and access to Sexual and Reproductive Health (SRH) Services |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Has experienced violence during a pregnancy | State: Karnataka | Was told about side effects of family planning methods by health worker | Respondent works/is employed with someone outside of family | Husband alone usually decides on visits to family or relatives | During delivery, did not experience excessive bleeding | Total lifetime number of sex partners: one | Has not sought STI advice/treatment from: private hospital/clinic/private doctor |
| Has experienced physical violence, perpetrated by anyone other than husband | District: Buldana (state: Maharashtra) | Received two tetanus injections before pregnancy | Respondent alone usually decides what to do with money husband earns | Respondent alone decides on respondent's health care | During delivery, friend/relative assisted in childbirth | Is not married and no sex in last 30 days | Has not sought STI advice/treatment from: public government hospital |
| Timing of first instance of domestic violence (physical/sexual) in years after marriage: 0 years | Respondent's mother tongue: Bengali | Received Hepatitis B injection | Getting medical help for self: getting money needed for treatment is a big problem | Has had a pregnancy terminated | Had sex with most recent partner the last time: 100:130 days ago | Has not sought STI advice/treatment from any other sources | |
| Timing of first instance of domestic violence (physical/sexual) in years after marriage: 2 years | Respondent's child has received the polio vaccine | Knows of some modern contraceptive method | |||||
| Has physically hurt husband/partner when he was not hurting her | The time the respondent got any injection in last 12 months, the health worker took the syringe and needle from a new, unopened package | ||||||
| Respondent's father beat her mother | During pregnancy, given or bought iron tablets/syrup | ||||||
| Experienced either physical and/or sexual intimate partner violence | Has had a pregnancy terminated | ||||||
| Is afraid of husband/partner most of the time | Person who usually decides on respondent's health care: respondent alone | ||||||
| Getting medical help for self: getting money needed for treatment is a big problem | |||||||
| Can access a condom if needed |
Fig. 1AUC and BER values for different rounds of the iterative models and iterative thematic analysis (ITA) process for complete sample.
Findings indicate good reliability and low error for each of our iterative models 1–4.
Identified predictors from neural network model for complete sample of women of age 15–49 years old.
| Has experienced violence during a pregnancy (0.46) |
| Has experienced physical violence, perpetrated by anyone other than husband (0.36) |
| Has experienced physical and/or sexual intimate partner violence (0.29) |
| Has experienced emotional intimate partner violence (0.28) |
| Timing of first instance of domestic violence (physical/sexual) in years after marriage: 0 years (0.26) |
| Had sex with most recent partner the last time: over 299 days ago (0.23) |
| Is afraid of husband/partner most of the time (0.23) |
| Respondent's occupation: agricultural (0.22) |
| State: Uttar Pradesh (0.22) |
| Owns a house alone as well as jointly (0.21) |
| Has had no injections in the last 12 months (0.21) |
| Husband/partner's occupation: Services (0.21) |
| Respondent's father beat her mother (0.20) |
| Last source of contraceptive for users by type: government clinic/pharmacy (0.20) |
| Has received result from the last HIV test (0.20) |
| Frequency eats fish: daily (0.20) |
| Wealth index – urban and richer (fourth wealth index quintile) (0.19) |
| Respondent earns more money than husband/partner |
| Source of information about HIV/AIDS: Radio |
| Last contraceptive method discontinued in last 5 years: Withdrawal |
predictors are those features that are above the knee point in coefficient curve; predictors presented in order of coefficient size (largest to smallest)
Identified predictors for corresponding themes from the iterative thematic analysis (ITA) for never married adolescent sample (15–19 years).
| Experiences of or exposure to violence, and attitudes toward spousal violence | Knowledge of and access to Sexual and Reproductive Health (SRH) | Freedom of movement or mobility | Economic circumstances, engagement and empowerment | Health care access and use | Nutrition | Access to information or media |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Someone physically hurt respondent | Has heard about other STIs | Has been away for more than one month in last 12 months | Wealth index – rural: poorer | Getting medical help for self: having to take transport is a big problem | Frequency eats fried food: daily | Frequency of watching television: less than once a week |
| Respondent's father beat her mother | Source of information about AIDS: adult education programme | Usual resident or visitor: visitor | Wealth index: richest | Getting medical help for self: concern no provider is a big problem | Frequency takes milk or curd: never | Heard family planning on TV last few months: no |
| Beating justified if wife doesn't cook food properly | Source of information about AIDS: radio | Getting medical help for self: having to take transport is a big problem | Wealth index - urban: richest | Source for condoms: private: pharmacy/drugstore | Frequency eats fruits: never | Frequency of listening to radio: less than once a week |
| Beating justified if wife argues with husband | Source of information about AIDS: health workers | Has been away from home, other than parents’ home, for six months or more | Respondent works for family, others, self: for someone else | Source of FP: pharmacy/drugstore | Frequency takes aerated drinks: never | |
| Beating justified if wife argues with husband | Ways to avoid HIV/AIDS: use only new/sterilized needles | Has not been away from home, other than parents’ home, for six months or more | Visited a health facility or camp for self or children in last 3 months | |||
| Beating justified if wife neglects the children | Ways to avoid HIV/AIDS: avoid sex with persons who have many partners | Type of health facility or camp visited for self or children in last 3 months: other | ||||
| Beating justified if wife refuses to have sex with husband | Does not know if people with HIV be allowed to work in the same office with people who do not have HIV | Type of health facility or camp visited for self or children in last 3 months: private or NGO | ||||
| Justifies domestic violence if wife is unfaithful | Does not know if HIV transmitted during delivery | Services/matters talked about in last 3 months: medical treatment for self | ||||
| HIV not transmitted by breastfeeding | Service went for: medical treatment for self | |||||
| People can get HIV/AIDS from blood products or blood transfusions | Blood pressure has been checked previously | |||||
| Always using condoms during sex does not reduce risk of getting HIV | Never heard of oral rehydration | |||||
| Having 1 sex partner only, who has no other partners can reduce risk of getting HIV | ||||||
| Would not buy vegetables from vendor with HIV | ||||||
| Would want HIV infection in family to remain secret | ||||||
| Can get HIV by sharing food with person who has aids | ||||||
| Place for HIV test: private: hospital/clinic/private doctor | ||||||
| Knows condoms | ||||||
| Knows IUD | ||||||
| Does not know foam/jelly | ||||||
| Does not know if they can get a condom | ||||||
| Knows a source for condoms | ||||||
| Source for condoms: ration shop | ||||||
| Source for condoms: private: pharmacy/drugstore | ||||||
| Source for condoms: ration or other shop or vending machine | ||||||
| Source of FP: pharmacy/drugstore | ||||||
| Has not heard family planning on TV last few months | ||||||
| Seen family planning message on a wall painting or hoarding | ||||||
| Knows that ovulatory cycle begins after period ends |
Identified predictors from neural network model for adolescent sample (15–19 years).
| Ways to avoid HIV/AIDS does not include use only new/sterilized needles (0.85) |
| Ways to avoid HIV/AIDS does not include avoiding sex with homosexuals (0.83) |
| Ways to avoid HIV/AIDS does not include avoiding sex with persons who inject drugs (0.82) |
| Someone physically hurt respondent (0.79) |
| Ways to avoid HIV/AIDS: don't know (0.78) |
| Ways to avoid HIV/AIDS does not include avoiding sex with sex workers (0.78) |
| Ways to avoid HIV/AIDS does not include avoiding sharing razors/blades (0.78) |
| Ways to avoid HIV/AIDS does not include limiting the number of sexual partners (0.77) |
| Ways to avoid HIV/AIDS does not include avoiding sex with persons who have many partners (0.77) |
| Ways to avoid HIV/AIDS does not include using condoms (0.75) |
| Ways to avoid HIV/AIDS does not include avoiding kissing (0.75) |
| Respondent's father beat her mother (0.75) |
predictors are those features that are above the knee point in coefficient curve; predictors presented in order of coefficient size (largest to smallest)