Literature DB >> 19619925

Community influences on intimate partner violence in India: Women's education, attitudes towards mistreatment and standards of living.

Michael H Boyle1, Katholiki Georgiades, John Cullen, Yvonne Racine.   

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) directed towards women is a serious public health problem. Women's education may offer protection against IPV, but uncertainty exists over how it might reduce risk for IPV at the community and individual levels. The objectives of this study are to: (1) disentangle community from individual-level influences of women's education on risk for IPV; (2) quantify the moderating influence of communities on individual-level associations between women's education and IPV; (3) determine if women's attitudes towards mistreatment and living standards at the community and individual levels account for the protective influence of women's education; and (4) determine if the protective influence of education against IPV is muted among women living in communities exhibiting attitudes more accepting of mistreatment. Study information came from 68,466 married female participants in the National Family Health Survey conducted throughout India in 1998-1999. Multilevel logistic regression was used to address the study objectives. IPV showed substantial clustering at both the state (10.2%) and community levels (11.5%). At the individual level, there was a strong non-linear association between women's education and IPV, partially accounted for by household living standards. The strength of association between women's education and IPV varied from one community to the next with evidence that the acceptance of mistreatment at the community level mutes the protective influence of higher education. Furthermore, women's attitudes towards mistreatment and their standards of living accounted for community-level associations between women's education and IPV. Place of residence accounted for substantial variation in risk of IPV and also modified individual-level associations between IPV and women's education. At the community level, women's education appeared to exert much of its protective influence by altering population attitudes towards the acceptability of mistreatment. However, there was no residual association between women's education and IPV at the community level once living standards are taken into account. While women's education provides strong, independent leverage for reducing the risk of IPV, planners must keep in mind important community factors that modify its protective influence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19619925     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.06.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  41 in total

1.  Community social norms as social determinants of violence against women.

Authors:  Natalia Linos; Ichiro Kawachi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Characteristics of the residential neighborhood environment differentiate intimate partner femicide in urban versus rural settings.

Authors:  Kirsten M M Beyer; Peter M Layde; L Kevin Hamberger; Purushottam W Laud
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Men's Perpetration of Partner Violence in Bangladesh: Community Gender Norms and Violence in Childhood.

Authors:  Kathryn M Yount; Laurie James-Hawkins; Yuk Fai Cheong; Ruchira T Naved
Journal:  Psychol Men Masc       Date:  2016-09-19

4.  How do area-level socioeconomic status and gender norms affect partner violence against women? Evidence from Tanzania.

Authors:  Seema Vyas; Lori Heise
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.380

5.  Does Increasing Women's Education Reduce Their Risk of Intimate Partner Violence? Evidence from an Education Policy Reform.

Authors:  Abigail Weitzman
Journal:  Criminology       Date:  2018-06-25

6.  Indeterminate Responses to Attitudinal Questions About Intimate Partner Violence Against Women in Rural Bangladesh.

Authors:  Kathryn M Yount; Nafisa Halim; Sara Head; Sidney Ruth Schuler
Journal:  Popul Res Policy Rev       Date:  2012-12

7.  Influence of community social norms on spousal violence: a population-based multilevel study of Nigerian women.

Authors:  Natalia Linos; Natalie Slopen; S V Subramanian; Lisa Berkman; Ichiro Kawachi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 8.  Neighborhood environment and intimate partner violence: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kirsten Beyer; Anne Baber Wallis; L Kevin Hamberger
Journal:  Trauma Violence Abuse       Date:  2013-12-26

9.  Association between gap in spousal education and domestic violence in India and Bangladesh.

Authors:  Daniel Rapp; Beate Zoch; M Mobarak H Khan; Thorsten Pollmann; Alexander Krämer
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Characteristic of victims of family violence seeking care at health centers in Maputo, Mozambique.

Authors:  Eunice Abdul Remane Jethá; Catherine A Lynch; Debra E Houry; Maria Alexendra Rodrigues; Baltazar Chilundo; Scott M Sasser; David W Wright
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2011-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.