Literature DB >> 34400592

Residual voltage as an ad-hoc indicator of electrode damage in biphasic electrical stimulation.

Ashwati Krishnan1, Mats Forssell1, Zhanhong Du2, X Tracy Cui3, Gary K Fedder1, Shawn K Kelly4,5.   

Abstract

Objective.We derive and demonstrate how residual voltage (RV) from a biphasic electrical stimulation pulse can be used to recognize degradation at the electrode-tissue interface.Approach.Using a first order model of the electrode-tissue interface and a rectangular biphasic stimulation current waveform, we derive the equations for RV as well as RV growth over several stimulation pulses. To demonstrate the use of RV for damage detection, we simulate accelerated damage on sputtered iridium oxide film (SIROF) electrodes using potential cycling. RV measurements of the degraded electrodes are compared against standard characterization methods of cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy.Main results.Our theoretical discussion illustrates how an intrinsic RV arises even from perfectly balanced biphasic pulses due to leakage via the charge-transfer resistance. Preliminary data inin-vivorat experiments follow the derived model of RV growth, thereby validating our hypothesis that RV is a characteristic of the electrode-tissue interface. RV can therefore be utilized for detecting damage at the electrode. Our experimental results for damage detection show that delamination of SIROF electrodes causes a reduction in charge storage capacity, which in turn reflects a measurable increase in RV.Significance.Chronically implanted electrical stimulation systems with multi-electrode arrays have been the focus of physiological engineering research for the last decade. Changes in RV over time can be a quick and effective method to identify and disconnect faulty electrodes in large arrays. Timely diagnoses of electrode status can ensure optimal long term operation, and prevent further damage to the tissue near these electrodes.
© 2021 IOP Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biphasic current stimulation; electrical stimulation; electrode damage detection; electrode health monitoring; electrode-tissue interface; residual voltage

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34400592      PMCID: PMC9032463          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac028a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.043


  19 in total

Review 1.  Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols.

Authors:  Daniel R Merrill; Marom Bikson; John G R Jefferys
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Impedance characterization of microarray recording electrodes in vitro.

Authors:  Daniel R Merrill; Patrick A Tresco
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  A power-efficient neural tissue stimulator with energy recovery.

Authors:  S K Kelly; J L Wyatt
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.833

4.  Interphase gap as a means to reduce electrical stimulation thresholds for epiretinal prostheses.

Authors:  Andrew C Weitz; Matthew R Behrend; Ashish K Ahuja; Punita Christopher; Jianing Wei; Varalakshmi Wuyyuru; Uday Patel; Robert J Greenberg; Mark S Humayun; Robert H Chow; James D Weiland
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Sputtered iridium oxide films (SIROFs) for low-impedance neural stimulation and recording electrodes.

Authors:  S F Cogan; T D Plante; J Ehrlich
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2004

Review 6.  Neural stimulation and recording electrodes.

Authors:  Stuart F Cogan
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.590

7.  BBB leakage, astrogliosis, and tissue loss correlate with silicon microelectrode array recording performance.

Authors:  Nicholas F Nolta; Michael B Christensen; Paul D Crane; John L Skousen; Patrick A Tresco
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Effects of biphasic current pulse frequency, amplitude, duration, and interphase gap on eye movement responses to prosthetic electrical stimulation of the vestibular nerve.

Authors:  Natan S Davidovics; Gene Y Fridman; Bryce Chiang; Charles C Della Santina
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 3.802

9.  Failure mode analysis of silicon-based intracortical microelectrode arrays in non-human primates.

Authors:  James C Barrese; Naveen Rao; Kaivon Paroo; Corey Triebwasser; Carlos Vargas-Irwin; Lachlan Franquemont; John P Donoghue
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 10.  Tissue damage thresholds during therapeutic electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Stuart F Cogan; Kip A Ludwig; Cristin G Welle; Pavel Takmakov
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.