Literature DB >> 25890770

BBB leakage, astrogliosis, and tissue loss correlate with silicon microelectrode array recording performance.

Nicholas F Nolta1, Michael B Christensen1, Paul D Crane1, John L Skousen1, Patrick A Tresco2.   

Abstract

The clinical usefulness of brain machine interfaces that employ penetrating silicon microelectrode arrays is limited by inconsistent performance at chronic time points. While it is widely believed that elements of the foreign body response (FBR) contribute to inconsistent single unit recording performance, the relationships between the FBR and recording performance have not been well established. To address this shortfall, we implanted 4X4 Utah Electrode Arrays into the cortex of 28 young adult rats, acquired electrophysiological recordings weekly for up to 12 weeks, used quantitative immunohistochemical methods to examine the intensity and spatial distribution of neural and FBR biomarkers, and examined whether relationships existed between biomarker distribution and recording performance. We observed that the FBR was characterized by persistent inflammation and consisted of typical biomarkers, including presumptive activated macrophages and activated microglia, astrogliosis, and plasma proteins indicative of blood-brain-barrier disruption, as well as general decreases in neuronal process distribution. However, unlike what has been described for recording electrodes that create only a single penetrating injury, substantial brain tissue loss generally in the shape of a pyramidal lesion cavity was observed at the implantation site. Such lesions were also observed in stab wounded animals indicating that the damage was caused by vascular disruption at the time of implantation. Using statistical approaches, we found that blood-brain barrier leakiness and astrogliosis were both associated with reduced recording performance, and that tissue loss was negatively correlated with recording performance. Taken together, our data suggest that a reduction of vascular damage at the time of implantation either by design changes or use of hemostatic coatings coupled to a reduction of chronic inflammatory sequela will likely improve the recording performance of high density intracortical silicon microelectrode arrays over long indwelling periods and lead to enhanced clinical use of this promising technology.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood flow; Brain; Electrode; Foreign body response; Inflammation; Neural prosthesis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25890770     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  52 in total

1.  Glial responses to implanted electrodes in the brain.

Authors:  Joseph W Salatino; Kip A Ludwig; Takashi D Y Kozai; Erin K Purcell
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 25.671

2.  Toward guiding principles for the design of biologically-integrated electrodes for the central nervous system.

Authors:  Cort H Thompson; Ti'Air E Riggins; Paras R Patel; Cynthia A Chestek; Wen Li; Erin Purcell
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 3.  Understanding the Role of Innate Immunity in the Response to Intracortical Microelectrodes.

Authors:  John K Hermann; Jeffrey R Capadona
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2018

4.  A Materials Roadmap to Functional Neural Interface Design.

Authors:  Steven M Wellman; James R Eles; Kip A Ludwig; John P Seymour; Nicholas J Michelson; William E McFadden; Alberto L Vazquez; Takashi D Y Kozai
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 18.808

Review 5.  A Critical Review of Microelectrode Arrays and Strategies for Improving Neural Interfaces.

Authors:  Morgan Ferguson; Dhavan Sharma; David Ross; Feng Zhao
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 9.933

6.  Electrodeposited platinum-iridium coating improves in vivo recording performance of chronically implanted microelectrode arrays.

Authors:  Isaac R Cassar; Chunxiu Yu; Jaydeep Sambangi; Curtis D Lee; John J Whalen; Artin Petrossians; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Unique electrophysiological and impedance signatures between encapsulation types: An analysis of biological Utah array failure and benefit of a biomimetic coating in a rat model.

Authors:  Patrick A Cody; James R Eles; Carl F Lagenaur; Takashi D Y Kozai; X Tracy Cui
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  The robo-pigeon based on the multiple brain regions synchronization implanted microelectrodes.

Authors:  Rui-Tuo Huai; Jun-Qing Yang; Hui Wang
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2016-07-03       Impact factor: 3.269

Review 9.  Potential for thermal damage to the blood-brain barrier during craniotomy: implications for intracortical recording microelectrodes.

Authors:  Andrew J Shoffstall; Jen E Paiz; David M Miller; Griffin M Rial; Mitchell T Willis; Dhariyat M Menendez; Stephen R Hostler; Jeffrey R Capadona
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  A 512-Channel Multi-Layer Polymer-Based Neural Probe Array.

Authors:  Kee Scholten; Christopher E Larson; Huijing Xu; Dong Song; Ellis Meng
Journal:  J Microelectromech Syst       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 2.417

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.