Literature DB >> 34392364

The Initial Step Towards Establishing a Quantitative, Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Framework for Response Assessment of Spinal Metastases After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

Pejman Jabehdar Maralani1, Chia-Lin Tseng2, Hamidreza Baharjoo1, Erin Wong1, Anish Kapadia1, Archya Dasgupta2, Peter Howard1, Aimee K M Chan1, Eshetu G Atenafu3, Hua Lu1, Pascal Tyrrell1,4,5, Sunit Das6, Seyedmehdi Payabvash7, Jay Detsky2, Zain Husain2, Sten Myrehaug2, Hany Soliman2, Hanbo Chen2, Chris Heyn1, Sean Symons1, Arjun Sahgal2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are no established threshold values regarding the degree of growth on imaging when assessing response of spinal metastases treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).
OBJECTIVE: To determine a magnetic resonance imaging-based minimum detectable difference (MDD) in gross tumor volume (GTV) and its association with 1-yr radiation site-specific (RSS) progression-free survival (PFS).
METHODS: GTVs at baseline and first 2 post-SBRT scans (Post1 and Post2, respectively) for 142 spinal segments were contoured, and percentage volume change between scans calculated. One-year RSS PFS was acquired from medical records. The MDD was determined. The MDD was compared against optimal thresholds of GTV changes associated with 1-yr RSS PFS using Youden's J index, and receiver operating characteristic curves between timepoints compared to determine which timeframe had the best association.
RESULTS: A total of 17 of the 142 segments demonstrated progression. The MDD was 10.9%. Baseline-Post2 demonstrated the best performance (area under the curve [AUC] 0.90). Only Baseline-Post2 had an optimal threshold > MDD at 14.7%. Due to large distribution of GTVs, volumes were split into tertiles. Small tumors (GTV < 2 cc) had optimal thresholds of 42.0%, 71.3%, and 37.2% at Baseline-Post1 (AUC 0.81), Baseline-Post2 (AUC 0.89), and Post1-Post2 (AUC 0.77), respectively. Medium tumors (2 ≤ GTV ≤ 8.3 cc) all demonstrated optimal thresholds < MDD, with AUCs ranging from 0.65 to 0.84. Large tumors (GTV > 8.3 cc) had 2 timepoints where optimal thresholds > MDD: Baseline-Post2 (13.3%; AUC 0.97) and Post1-Post2 (11.8%; AUC 0.66). Baseline-Post2 had the best association with RSS PFS for all tertiles.
CONCLUSION: Given a MDD of 10.9%, for small GTVs, larger (>37%) changes were required before local failure could be determined, compared to 11% to 13% for medium/large tumors. © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; Disease progression; Metastasis; Outcome; Spine; Stereotactic body radiotherapy

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34392364      PMCID: PMC8645191          DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyab310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   5.315


  15 in total

1.  International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium consensus guidelines for target volume definition in spinal stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Brett W Cox; Daniel E Spratt; Michael Lovelock; Mark H Bilsky; Eric Lis; Samuel Ryu; Jason Sheehan; Peter C Gerszten; Eric Chang; Iris Gibbs; Scott Soltys; Arjun Sahgal; Joe Deasy; John Flickinger; Mubina Quader; Stefan Mindea; Yoshiya Yamada
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Reliability analysis of the epidural spinal cord compression scale.

Authors:  Mark H Bilsky; Ilya Laufer; Daryl R Fourney; Michael Groff; Meic H Schmidt; Peter Paul Varga; Frank D Vrionis; Yoshiya Yamada; Peter C Gerszten; Timothy R Kuklo
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2010-09

3.  Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy.

Authors:  Stephen M Haley; Maria A Fragala-Pinkham
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2006-05

4.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Authors:  Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 6.071

5.  Population description and clinical response assessment for spinal metastases: part 2 of the SPIne response assessment in Neuro-Oncology (SPINO) group report.

Authors:  Ilya Laufer; Simon S Lo; Eric L Chang; Jason Sheehan; Matthias Guckenberger; Moon-Jun Sohn; Samuel Ryu; Matthew Foote; Alexander Muacevic; Scott G Soltys; Samuel Chao; Sten Myrehaug; Peter C Gerszten; Eric Lis; Pejman Maralani; Mark Bilsky; Charles Fisher; Laurence Rhines; Jorrit-Jan Verlaan; David Schiff; Michael G Fehlings; Lijun Ma; Susan Chang; Wendy R Parulekar; Michael A Vogelbaum; Arjun Sahgal
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  Tumor pseudoprogression of spinal metastasis after radiosurgery: a novel concept and case reports.

Authors:  Douglas R Taylor; Jason A Weaver
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2015-02-06

7.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional external beam radiotherapy in patients with painful spinal metastases: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial.

Authors:  Arjun Sahgal; Sten D Myrehaug; Shankar Siva; Giuseppina L Masucci; Pejman J Maralani; Michael Brundage; James Butler; Edward Chow; Michael G Fehlings; Mathew Foote; Zsolt Gabos; Jeffrey Greenspoon; Marc Kerba; Young Lee; Mitchell Liu; Stanley K Liu; Isabelle Thibault; Rebecca K Wong; Maaike Hum; Keyue Ding; Wendy R Parulekar
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Imaging-Based Outcomes for 24 Gy in 2 Daily Fractions for Patients with de Novo Spinal Metastases Treated With Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT).

Authors:  Chia-Lin Tseng; Hany Soliman; Sten Myrehaug; Young K Lee; Mark Ruschin; Eshetu G Atenafu; Mikki Campbell; Pejman Maralani; Victor Yang; Albert Yee; Arjun Sahgal
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Incidence and Time of Onset of Osseous Pseudoprogression in Patients With Metastatic Spine Disease From Renal Cell or Prostate Carcinoma After Treatment With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Pejman Jabehdar Maralani; Kathleen Winger; Sean Symons; Matylda Machnowska; Chinthaka Heyn; Ali Helmi; Aimee Chan; Chia-Lin Tseng; Arjun Sahgal
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  1 in total

1.  Response assessment after stereotactic body radiation therapy for spine and non-spine bone metastases: results from a single institutional study.

Authors:  Dora Correia; Barbara Moullet; Jennifer Cullmann; Rafael Heiss; Ekin Ermiş; Daniel M Aebersold; Hossein Hemmatazad
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 3.481

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.