Literature DB >> 16649896

Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy.

Stephen M Haley1, Maria A Fragala-Pinkham.   

Abstract

Over the past decade, the methods and science used to describe changes in outcomes of physical therapy services have become more refined. Recently, emphasis has been placed not only on changes beyond expected measurement error, but also on the identification of changes that make a real difference in the lives of patients and families. This article will highlight a case example of how to determine and interpret "clinically significant change" from both of these perspectives. The authors also examine how to use item maps within an item response theory model to enhance the interpretation of change at a content level. Recommendations are provided for physical therapists who are interpreting changes in the context of clinical practice, case reports, and intervention research. These recommendations include a greater application of indexes that help interpret the meaning of clinically significant change to multiple clinical, research, consumer, and payer communities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16649896

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  165 in total

1.  Reliability of the dial test using a handheld inclinometer.

Authors:  David A Krause; Bruce A Levy; Jay P Shah; Michael J Stuart; John H Hollman; Diane L Dahm
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Functional gait assessment and balance evaluation system test: reliability, validity, sensitivity, and specificity for identifying individuals with Parkinson disease who fall.

Authors:  Abigail L Leddy; Beth E Crowner; Gammon M Earhart
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2010-11-11

3.  A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Exercise for Parkinsonian Individuals With Freezing of Gait.

Authors:  Carla Silva-Batista; Andrea Cristina de Lima-Pardini; Mariana Penteado Nucci; Daniel Boari Coelho; Alana Batista; Maria Elisa Pimentel Piemonte; Egberto Reis Barbosa; Luis Augusto Teixeira; Daniel M Corcos; Edson Amaro; Fay B Horak; Carlos Ugrinowitsch
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 10.338

4.  Minimal detectable change of the actual amount of use test and the motor activity log: the EXCITE Trial.

Authors:  Shuya Chen; Steven L Wolf; Qin Zhang; Paul A Thompson; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  A method to provide a more efficient and reliable measure of self-report physical work capacity for patients with spinal pain.

Authors:  Leonard Matheson; John Mayer; Vert Mooney; Andrew Sarkin; Theodore Dreisinger; Joe Verna; Scott Leggett
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-11-20

6.  A systematic review of outcome tools used to measure lower leg conditions.

Authors:  Susan Shultz; Amanda Olszewski; Olivia Ramsey; Michelle Schmitz; Verrelle Wyatt; Chad Cook
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-12

7.  Reliability and responsiveness of gait speed, five times sit to stand, and hand grip strength for patients in cardiac rehabilitation.

Authors:  Michael L Puthoff; Dan Saskowski
Journal:  Cardiopulm Phys Ther J       Date:  2013-03

8.  Reliability and validity of functional performance tests in dancers with hip dysfunction.

Authors:  Benjamin R Kivlan; Christopher R Carcia; F Richard Clemente; Amy L Phelps; Robroy L Martin
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-08

9.  Test-Retest Reliability of Dynamic Balance Performance-Based Measures Among Adults With a Unilateral Lower-Limb Amputation.

Authors:  Jefferson R Cardoso; Emma H Beisheim; John R Horne; J Megan Sions
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 2.298

10.  The Effect of Voice Ambulatory Biofeedback on the Daily Performance and Retention of a Modified Vocal Motor Behavior in Participants With Normal Voices.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.