Literature DB >> 25658469

Tumor pseudoprogression of spinal metastasis after radiosurgery: a novel concept and case reports.

Douglas R Taylor1, Jason A Weaver.   

Abstract

Radiosurgery for primary and metastatic tumors of the central nervous system is increasing in utility and intensity. Known complications in the brain include radiation necrosis and the well-documented phenomenon of pseudoprogression. Known complications of radiosurgery to spinal column tumors include radiation myelopathy and delayed vertebral compression fractures; however, the concept of pseudoprogression of spinal column tumors has not been previously described. The authors review 2 cases of spinal metastasis treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and attempt to define the concept of spine tumor pseudoprogression. Two patients who had undergone SRS to the spine for metastatic disease presented in early follow-up (3 and 7 weeks) with symptomatic complaints consisting of axial pain, radicular pain, or evidence of cord compression. In both patients, MRI revealed evidence of tumor enlargement. In one patient, the lesion had grown by 9 mm and 7.7 mm in the axial and sagittal planes, respectively. In the other patient, the tumor growth resulted in a 5-mm decrease in spinal canal diameter with epidural compression and right foraminal encroachment. Because of the absence of progressive neurological deficit, myelopathy, mechanical symptomatology of instability, or vertebral compression fracture, the first patient was treated expectantly with a corticosteroid taper and had improvement of symptoms at 1 month and near-total radiographic resolution of the tumor. In the second patient, worsening symptoms suggested a need for surgical intervention to address presumed radiosurgical failure and tumor progression. During surgery, only necrotic tumor cells were observed, without viable tumor. Follow-up imaging over 1 year showed ongoing local control. To their knowledge, the authors report the first description of pseudoprogression involving spinal column metastasis in the literature and aim to alert the treating physician to this clinical situation. Unlike brain tumor pseudoprogression, spine tumor pseudoprogression is a relatively early posttreatment phenomenon, measured in days to 2 months. The authors believe that the acute inflammatory response associated with tumor necrosis and disruption of the tumor capillary integrity caused by radiotherapy is an important component in the development of pseudoprogression. Future studies will be fundamental in assigning clinical significance, defining the incidence and predictors, and affecting future management of this phenomenon.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SRS = stereotactic radiosurgery; magnetic resonance imaging; oncology; pseudoprogression; spine; stereotactic radiosurgery; tumor

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25658469     DOI: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE14444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  6 in total

1.  The Initial Step Towards Establishing a Quantitative, Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Framework for Response Assessment of Spinal Metastases After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Pejman Jabehdar Maralani; Chia-Lin Tseng; Hamidreza Baharjoo; Erin Wong; Anish Kapadia; Archya Dasgupta; Peter Howard; Aimee K M Chan; Eshetu G Atenafu; Hua Lu; Pascal Tyrrell; Sunit Das; Seyedmehdi Payabvash; Jay Detsky; Zain Husain; Sten Myrehaug; Hany Soliman; Hanbo Chen; Chris Heyn; Sean Symons; Arjun Sahgal
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Osseous Pseudoprogression in Vertebral Bodies Treated with Stereotactic Radiosurgery: A Secondary Analysis of Prospective Phase I/II Clinical Trials.

Authors:  B Amini; C B Beaman; J E Madewell; P K Allen; L D Rhines; C E Tatsui; N M Tannir; J Li; P D Brown; A J Ghia
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Spine Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Indications, Outcomes, and Points of Caution.

Authors:  Chia-Lin Tseng; Wietse Eppinga; Raphaele Charest-Morin; Hany Soliman; Sten Myrehaug; Pejman Jabehdar Maralani; Mikki Campbell; Young K Lee; Charles Fisher; Michael G Fehlings; Eric L Chang; Simon S Lo; Arjun Sahgal
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-04-06

4.  Response assessment after stereotactic body radiation therapy for spine and non-spine bone metastases: results from a single institutional study.

Authors:  Dora Correia; Barbara Moullet; Jennifer Cullmann; Rafael Heiss; Ekin Ermiş; Daniel M Aebersold; Hossein Hemmatazad
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 5.  Application of Artificial Intelligence Methods for Imaging of Spinal Metastasis.

Authors:  Wilson Ong; Lei Zhu; Wenqiao Zhang; Tricia Kuah; Desmond Shi Wei Lim; Xi Zhen Low; Yee Liang Thian; Ee Chin Teo; Jiong Hao Tan; Naresh Kumar; Balamurugan A Vellayappan; Beng Chin Ooi; Swee Tian Quek; Andrew Makmur; James Thomas Patrick Decourcy Hallinan
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 6.  The Challenges of Renal Cell Carcinoma Metastatic to the Spine: A Systematic Review of Survival and Treatment.

Authors:  C Rory Goodwin; A Karim Ahmed; Christine Boone; Nancy Abu-Bonsrah; Risheng Xu; Niccole Germscheid; Daryl R Fourney; Michelle Clarke; Ilya Laufer; Charles G Fisher; Chetan Bettegowda; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-11-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.