Brian Zenger1, Wilson W Good2, Jake A Bergquist2, Lindsay C Rupp2, Maura Perez3, Gregory J Stoddard4, Vikas Sharma5, Rob S MacLeod2. 1. Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, SLC, UT, USA; Nora Eccles Harrison Cardiovascular Research and Training Institute, University of Utah, SLC, UT, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, SLC, UT, USA; School of Medicine, University of Utah, SLC, UT, USA. Electronic address: brian.zenger@hsc.utah.edu. 2. Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, SLC, UT, USA; Nora Eccles Harrison Cardiovascular Research and Training Institute, University of Utah, SLC, UT, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, SLC, UT, USA. 3. Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, SLC, UT, USA. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, SLC, UT, USA. 5. School of Medicine, University of Utah, SLC, UT, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial ischemia has several characteristic ECG findings, including clinically detectable ST-segment deviations. However, the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis based on ST-segment changes are low. Furthermore, ST-segment deviations have been shown to be transient and spontaneously recover without any indication the ischemic event has subsided. OBJECTIVE: Assess the transient recovery of ST-segment deviations on remote recording electrodes during a partial occlusion cardiac stress test and compare them to intramyocardial ST-segment deviations. METHODS: We used a previously validated porcine experimental model of acute myocardial ischemia with controllable ischemic load and simultaneous electrical measurements within the heart wall, on the epicardial surface, and on the torso surface. Simulated cardiac stress tests were induced by occluding a coronary artery while simultaneously pacing rapidly or infusing dobutamine to stimulate cardiac function. Postexperimental imaging created anatomical models for data visualization and quantification. Markers of ischemia were identified as deviations in the potentials measured at 40% of the ST-segment. Intramural cardiac conduction speed was also determined using the inverse gradient method. We assessed changes in intramyocardial ischemic volume proportion, conduction speed, clinical presence of ischemia on remote recording arrays, and regional changes to intramyocardial ischemia. We defined the peak deviation response time as the time interval after onset of ischemia at which maximum ST-segment deviation was achieved, and ST-recovery time was the interval when ST deviation returned to below thresholded of ST elevation. RESULTS: In both epicardial and torso recordings, the peak ST-segment deviation response time was 4.9±1.1 min and the ST-recovery time was approximately 7.9±2.5 min, both well before the termination of the ischemic stress. At peak response time, conduction speed was reduced by 50% and returned to near baseline at ST-recovery. The overall ischemic volume proportion initially increased, on average, to 37% at peak response time; however, it recovered to only 30% at the ST-recovery time. By contrast, the subepicardial region of the myocardial wall showed 40% ischemic volume at peak response time and recovered much more strongly to 25% as epicardial ST-segment deviations returned to baseline. CONCLUSION: Our data show that remote ischemic signal recovery correlates with a recovery of the subepicardial myocardium, whereas subendocardial ischemic development persists.
BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial ischemia has several characteristic ECG findings, including clinically detectable ST-segment deviations. However, the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis based on ST-segment changes are low. Furthermore, ST-segment deviations have been shown to be transient and spontaneously recover without any indication the ischemic event has subsided. OBJECTIVE: Assess the transient recovery of ST-segment deviations on remote recording electrodes during a partial occlusion cardiac stress test and compare them to intramyocardial ST-segment deviations. METHODS: We used a previously validated porcine experimental model of acute myocardial ischemia with controllable ischemic load and simultaneous electrical measurements within the heart wall, on the epicardial surface, and on the torso surface. Simulated cardiac stress tests were induced by occluding a coronary artery while simultaneously pacing rapidly or infusing dobutamine to stimulate cardiac function. Postexperimental imaging created anatomical models for data visualization and quantification. Markers of ischemia were identified as deviations in the potentials measured at 40% of the ST-segment. Intramural cardiac conduction speed was also determined using the inverse gradient method. We assessed changes in intramyocardial ischemic volume proportion, conduction speed, clinical presence of ischemia on remote recording arrays, and regional changes to intramyocardial ischemia. We defined the peak deviation response time as the time interval after onset of ischemia at which maximum ST-segment deviation was achieved, and ST-recovery time was the interval when ST deviation returned to below thresholded of ST elevation. RESULTS: In both epicardial and torso recordings, the peak ST-segment deviation response time was 4.9±1.1 min and the ST-recovery time was approximately 7.9±2.5 min, both well before the termination of the ischemic stress. At peak response time, conduction speed was reduced by 50% and returned to near baseline at ST-recovery. The overall ischemic volume proportion initially increased, on average, to 37% at peak response time; however, it recovered to only 30% at the ST-recovery time. By contrast, the subepicardial region of the myocardial wall showed 40% ischemic volume at peak response time and recovered much more strongly to 25% as epicardial ST-segment deviations returned to baseline. CONCLUSION: Our data show that remote ischemic signal recovery correlates with a recovery of the subepicardial myocardium, whereas subendocardial ischemic development persists.
Authors: Brian Zenger; Wilson W Good; Jake A Bergquist; Brett M Burton; Jess D Tate; Leo Berkenbile; Vikas Sharma; Rob S MacLeod Journal: Physiol Meas Date: 2020-02-05 Impact factor: 2.833
Authors: Wilson W Good; Karli K Gillette; Brian Zenger; Jake A Bergquist; Lindsay C Rupp; Jess Tate; Devan Anderson; Matthias A F Gsell; Gernot Plank; Rob S MacLeod Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2021-10-19 Impact factor: 4.756