Literature DB >> 10411847

Effects of dobutamine on coronary stenosis physiology and morphology: comparison with intracoronary adenosine.

J Bartunek1, W Wijns, G R Heyndrickx, B de Bruyne.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The mechanisms leading to dobutamine-induced ischemia are not fully understood. In the present study, we investigated the effects of high-dose intravenous dobutamine on morphological and physiological indexes of coronary stenoses. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with normal left ventricular function and isolated coronary stenoses were studied. At catheterization, mean aortic pressure (P(a)), mean distal coronary pressure (P(d)), and P(d)/P(a) as an index of myocardial resistance were recorded at rest, after intracoronary adenosine, and during intravenous infusion of dobutamine (10 to 40 micrograms . kg(-1). min(-1)). Reference vessel diameter and minimal luminal diameter, as assessed by coronary angiography, did not change during dobutamine infusion compared with baseline (2.84+/-0.49 versus 2.77+/-0.41 mm and 1.35+/-0.38 versus 1. 27+/-0.31 mm, respectively; both P=NS). During peak dobutamine infusion, P(d) and P(d)/P(a) reached similar levels as during adenosine infusion (60+/-18 versus 59+/-18 mm Hg and 0.68+/-0.18 versus 0.68+/-0.17, respectively; all P=NS). In 9 patients, an additional bolus of intracoronary adenosine given at the peak dose of dobutamine failed to further decrease P(d)/P(a). Furthermore, in patients with dobutamine-induced wall motion abnormalities, the maximal decrease in P(d)/P(a) was similar during dobutamine and adenosine infusions.
CONCLUSIONS: High-dose intravenous infusion of dobutamine does not modify the dimensions of the epicardial coronary stenosis. However, much like the direct coronary vasodilator adenosine, dobutamine fully exhausts myocardial resistance regardless of the presence of mechanical dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10411847     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.100.3.243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  12 in total

1.  Procedure guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  C Anagnostopoulos; M Harbinson; A Kelion; K Kundley; C Y Loong; A Notghi; E Reyes; W Tindale; S R Underwood
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  BSE procedure guidelines for the clinical application of stress echocardiography, recommendations for performance and interpretation of stress echocardiography: a report of the British Society of Echocardiography Policy Committee.

Authors:  H Becher; J Chambers; K Fox; R Jones; G J Leech; N Masani; M Monaghan; R More; P Nihoyannopoulos; H Rimington; R Senior; G Warton
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Preserved coronary flow reserve effectively excludes high-risk coronary artery disease on angiography.

Authors:  Masanao Naya; Venkatesh L Murthy; Viviany R Taqueti; Courtney R Foster; Josh Klein; Mariya Garber; Sharmila Dorbala; Jon Hainer; Ron Blankstein; Frederick Resnic; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Clinical Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow Using PET: Joint Position Paper of the SNMMI Cardiovascular Council and the ASNC.

Authors:  Venkatesh L Murthy; Timothy M Bateman; Rob S Beanlands; Daniel S Berman; Salvador Borges-Neto; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee; Manuel D Cerqueira; Robert A deKemp; E Gordon DePuey; Vasken Dilsizian; Sharmila Dorbala; Edward P Ficaro; Ernest V Garcia; Henry Gewirtz; Gary V Heller; Howard C Lewin; Saurabh Malhotra; April Mann; Terrence D Ruddy; Thomas H Schindler; Ronald G Schwartz; Piotr J Slomka; Prem Soman; Marcelo F Di Carli; Andrew Einstein; Raymond Russell; James R Corbett
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Assessment of coronary flow reserve using single photon emission computed tomography with technetium 99m-labeled tracers.

Authors:  Mario Petretta; Andrea Soricelli; Giovanni Storto; Alberto Cuocolo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Imaging the physiology of the ischemic cascade: are 2 tools better than 1?

Authors:  Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 7.792

7.  Comparison of myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve during dobutamine and adenosine stress: Implications for pharmacologic stress testing in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Rohan Jagathesan; Edward Barnes; Stuart D Rosen; Rodney A Foale; Paolo G Camici
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Transient recovery of epicardial and torso ST-segment ischemic signals during cardiac stress tests: A possible physiological mechanism.

Authors:  Brian Zenger; Wilson W Good; Jake A Bergquist; Lindsay C Rupp; Maura Perez; Gregory J Stoddard; Vikas Sharma; Rob S MacLeod
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 1.438

9.  Pharmacological and simulated exercise cardiac stress tests produce different ischemic signatures in high-resolution experimental mapping studies.

Authors:  Brian Zenger; Wilson W Good; Jake A Bergquist; Lindsay C Rupp; Maura Perez; Gregory J Stoddard; Vikas Sharma; Rob S MacLeod
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 1.380

10.  Exercise Strain Echocardiography in Patients With a Hemodynamically Significant Myocardial Bridge Assessed by Physiological Study.

Authors:  Yukari Kobayashi; Jennifer A Tremmel; Yuhei Kobayashi; Myriam Amsallem; Shigemitsu Tanaka; Ryotaro Yamada; Ian S Rogers; Francois Haddad; Ingela Schnittger
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.