Ian G Stiell1,2,3, Kerstin de Wit4,5, Frank X Scheuermeyer6, Alain Vadeboncoeur7,8, Paul Angaran9, Debra Eagles10,11, Ian D Graham11, Clare L Atzema12,13, Patrick M Archambault14, Troy Tebbenham15, Andrew D McRae16, Warren J Cheung10,11, Ratika Parkash17, Marc W Deyell18, Geneviève Baril19, Rick Mann20, Rupinder Sahsi21,22, Suneel Upadhye23, Erica Brown11, Jennifer Brinkhurst11, Christian Chabot24, Allan Skanes25. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. istiell@ohri.ca. 2. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada. istiell@ohri.ca. 3. Clinical Epidemiology Unit, The Ottawa Hospital, F657, 1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4E9, Canada. istiell@ohri.ca. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada. 5. Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 6. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 7. Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada. 8. Department of Emergency Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, QC, Canada. 9. Division of Cardiology, Terrence Donnelly Heart Centre, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 10. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 11. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 12. Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 13. Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada. 14. Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada. 15. Peterborough Regional Health Centre, Peterborough, ON, Canada. 16. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. 17. Division of Cardiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada. 18. Heart Rhythm Services, Division of Cardiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 19. Hôpital de Granby, Granby, QC, Canada. 20. Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga Hospital, Mississauga, ON, Canada. 21. Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 22. St. Mary's General Hospital, Kitchener, ON, Canada. 23. Division of Emergency Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 24. , Quebec City, QC, Canada. 25. Division of Cardiology, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
1. Is AF/AFL with rapid ventricular response a primary arrhythmia or secondary to medical causes?
Rapid rate secondary to medical causes (usually in patients with pre-existing/permanent AF) e.g., sepsis, bleeding, PE, heart failure, ACS, etc.:Investigate and treat underlying causes aggressivelyCardioversion may be harmfulAvoid aggressive rate controlPrimary arrhythmia, e.g., sudden onset of AF/AFL
2. Is the patient unstable?
Instability due to acute primary AF/AFL is uncommon, except for AF with rapid ventricular pre-excitation (WPW):Hypotension: SBP < 90 mmHg, or signs of shock (e.g., altered mental status)Cardiac ischemia: ongoing severe chest pain or marked ST depression (> 2 mm) on ECG despite therapyPulmonary edema: significant dyspnea, crackles, and hypoxiaTreat unstable patient:Urgent electrical CV if onset < 48 h or WPWConsider trial of rate control if onset > 48 h
3. Is it safe to cardiovert this patient with primary AF/AFL?
When it is safe, rhythm control is usually preferable to rate control: patient quality of life, shorter length of stay, fewer hospital resourcesIt is safe to cardiovert if:The patient has been adequately anticoagulated for a minimum of 3 weeks, ORThe patient is not adequately anticoagulated for > 3 weeks, has no history of stroke or TIA, AND does not have valvular heart disease, AND:Onset < 12 h ago, OROnset 12—48 h ago and there are <2 of these CHADS-65 criteria (age ≥ 65, diabetes, hypertension, heart failure), ORNegative for thrombus on transesophageal echocardiographyConsider delaying cardioversion if recent history of frequent palpitationsRate control acceptable, per patient and physician preferencee.g. older patients who are minimally symptomatic with a mildly elevated HR
B. Rate and rhythm control
4. Rate control for patients for whom cardioversion is unsafe
Calcium channel- and beta-blockers considered first line:If patient already taking oral calcium channel- or beta- blocker, choose same drug group firstIf difficulty achieving adequate rate control, consider using the other first-line agent, IV digoxin, or cardiology consultationCalcium channel blocker:Avoid if acute heart failure or known LV dysfunction (POCUS may be helpful)Diltiazem 0.25 mg/kg IV over 10 min; repeat q15-20 min at 0.35 mg/kg up to 3 dosesStart 30–60 mg PO within 30 min of effective IV rate controlDischarge on 30-60 mg QID or Extended Release 120–240 mg once dailyBeta blocker:Metoprolol 2.5–5 mg IV over 2 min, repeat q15–20 min up to 3 dosesStart 25–50 mg PO within 30 min of effective IV rate controlDischarge on 25–50 mg BIDDigoxin is second line, as slow onset:0.25–0.5 mg loading dose, then 0.25 mg IV q4–6 h to a max of 1.5 mg over 24 h; caution in renal failureConsider first line if hypotension or acute HFHeart rate target: < 100 bpm at rest, < 110 walking
5. Rhythm control
Either pharmacological or electrical cardioversion acceptable, per patient and physician preference:Consider previous episodes; if one doesn’t work, try the otherPre-treatment with rate control agents not recommended – ineffective and delays treatmentPharmacological cardioversion:Procainamide IV—15 mg/kg in 500 ml NS over 60 min, maximum 1500 mgAvoid if SBP < 100 mm Hg or QTc > 500 msInterrupt infusion if BP drops or QRS lengthens visibly (e.g., > 30%)Check QTc after conversionAmiodarone IV not recommended—slow, low efficacyLess commonly used options include: vernakalant IV, ibutilide IV, propafenone PO and flecainide POElectrical cardioversionSetup—minimum 2 staff (RN/RRT; RN/RN), 2nd physician idealProcedural sedation per local practice—e.g., Fentanyl, PropofolPad/paddle position—either antero-lateral or antero-posterior acceptable:Avoid sternum, breast tissueIf failure, apply pressure with paddles, try the other positionStart with 150–200 J synchronized—avoid starting with low energy levelMany patients can be discharged as soon as 30 min after conversion if treated with IV procainamide or ECV
6. Rapid ventricular pre-excitation (WPW)
Urgent electrical CV usually requiredProcainamide IV if stableAV nodal blocking agents contraindicated: digoxin, calcium channel-, beta-blockers, adenosine, amiodarone
C. Stroke prevention
7. Who requires anticoagulation?
Antithrombotic therapy prescribed at discharge is for long-term stroke preventionFor OAC contraindications see the ‘McMaster Checklist’If CHADS-65 positive (any of age ≥ 65, diabetes, hypertension, heart failure, stroke/TIA) initiate OAC prior to discharge; consider shared decision making to include patients’ preferences with regards to risks and benefits:DOACs preferred over warfarinUse warfarin (DOACs contraindicated) if mechanical valve, moderate-severe mitral stenosis, severe renal impairment (CrCl < 30 ml/min)If stable CAD, discontinue ASAIf CAD with other anti-platelets or recent PCI < 12 months, consult cardiologyIf CHADS-65 negative, OAC might be considered for a 4-week period after careful consideration of risks and benefits and a shared decision-making process with the patient; ensure patient is aware anticoagulation will be discontinued after 4 weeksCHADS-65 negative and stable coronary, aortic, or peripheral vascular disease, ensure patient is on ASA 81 mg dailyPatients already taking anti-platelet agents require follow-up with cardiologyIf TEE-guided CV, must initiate DOAC immediately × 4 weeksIf warfarin, need LMW heparin bridgingPatients who convert spontaneously before ED treatment should generally be prescribed OAC according to the CHADS-65 criteria
8. DOACs and warfarin
See Thrombosis Canada App for details; avoid in pregnancy, breastfeedingConsult nephrology or thrombosis if CrCl < 30 ml/minProvincial formularies may require Limited Use codes, e.g. failure of warfarin or INR monitoring not possible:Dabigatran—150 mg BID; use 110 mg BID if age > 80 years, or > 75 years with bleeding riskRivaroxaban—20 mg daily; use 15 mg daily if CrCl 30–49 ml/minApixaban—5 mg BID; use 2.5 mg BID if two of: (1) serum creatinine > 133 umol/L, (2) age > 80 years, or (3) body weight < 60 kgEdoxaban—60 mg daily; use 30 mg daily if CrCl 30–50 ml/min or weight < 60 kg; important drug interactionsWarfarinInitiate warfarin: 5 mg daily; (1–2 mg daily if frail, low weight, Asian descent):Heparin bridging not required unless TEE-guided CVArrange for INR blood test and review after 3 or 4 doses of warfarin. Subsequent warfarin doses should be communicated to patient on the day of the INR test
D. Disposition and follow-up
9. Admission to hospital
Patients rarely require hospital admission for uncomplicated acute AF/AFL unless they:Are highly symptomatic despite adequate treatmentHave ACS with significant chest pain, troponin rise, and ECG changesNo need to routinely measure troponin, small demand rise expectedHave acute heart failure not improved with ED treatment
10. Follow-up issues
Recommend physician follow-up < 7 days if new warfarin or rate control medsRecommend cardiology / internal medicine follow-up in 4–6 weeks if not already followed or if new medications prescribedProvide handout (available from Thrombosis Canada) describing new medication, atrial fibrillation, and follow-up; early renal function monitoring if new DOACDo not initiate anti-arrhythmic agents like amiodarone or propafenone in the EDIf sinus rhythm achieved, generally no need to initiate beta- or calcium channel-blockers
Overview of 2021 CAEP AF/AFL best practices checklist
Overview of 2021 CAEP AF/AFL best practices checklistEarly in 2021 the same Checklist Advisory Committee reconvened (with one additional academic cardiologist) to discuss updates based upon new evidence [3, 4, 11], the 2018 and 2020 CCS guidelines [12, 13], and several commentaries that had expressed the concern of the Canadian ED community [14, 15]. The Advisory Committee met twice virtually and reached consensus on updates through repeated email exchanges. The panelists then sought further feedback from their own colleagues in emergency medicine and cardiology. Finally, the 2021 Checklist was posted by CAEP for further member feedback prior to final approval. The panel continues to believe that, overall, a strategy of ED cardioversion and discharge home from the ED is preferable from both the patient and the healthcare system perspective, for most patients. Many notable revisions were incorporated, including:The safety of urgent cardioversion for acute AF/AFL depends upon anticoagulation status, prior stroke, valvular heart disease, time since onset, and CHADS criteria. Patients presenting between 12 and 48 h may only be cardioverted if they have 0 or 1 of the CHADS-65 criteria. We found that the CCS reference to CHADS2 Scale problematic as most ED physicians no longer use that scale.Anticoagulation for CHADS-65 positive patients should be initiated in the ED unless there are contradictions as per the “McMaster Checklist” created by Dr. de Wit.We disagree with the CCS suggestion of 4 weeks of anticoagulation for patients who are CHADS-65 negative as this was a weak recommendation per the GRADE system, based upon low quality evidence. We suggest that oral anticoagulation might be considered for a 4-week period after careful consideration of risks and benefits and a shared decision-making process with the patient.Our hope is that the 2021 CAEP Acute Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter Best Practices Checklist will standardize and improve care of AF and AFL in large and small EDs alike. We believe that these patients can be managed rapidly and safely, with early ED discharge and return to normal activities.
Authors: Frank X Scheuermeyer; Gary Andolfatto; Jim Christenson; Cristina Villa-Roel; Brian Rowe Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2019-08-19 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Atul Verma; John A Cairns; L Brent Mitchell; Laurent Macle; Ian G Stiell; David Gladstone; Michael Sean McMurtry; Stuart Connolly; Jafna L Cox; Paul Dorian; Noah Ivers; Kori Leblanc; Stanley Nattel; Jeff S Healey Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2014-08-13 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Nikki A H A Pluymaekers; Elton A M P Dudink; Justin G L M Luermans; Joan G Meeder; Timo Lenderink; Jos Widdershoven; Jeroen J J Bucx; Michiel Rienstra; Otto Kamp; Jurren M Van Opstal; Marco Alings; Anton Oomen; Charles J Kirchhof; Vincent F Van Dijk; Hemanth Ramanna; Anho Liem; Lukas R Dekker; Brigitte A B Essers; Jan G P Tijssen; Isabelle C Van Gelder; Harry J G M Crijns Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ian G Stiell; Marco L A Sivilotti; Monica Taljaard; David Birnie; Alain Vadeboncoeur; Corinne M Hohl; Andrew D McRae; Brian H Rowe; Robert J Brison; Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy; Laurent Macle; Bjug Borgundvaag; Judy Morris; Eric Mercier; Catherine M Clement; Jennifer Brinkhurst; Connor Sheehan; Erica Brown; Marie-Joe Nemnom; George A Wells; Jeffrey J Perry Journal: Lancet Date: 2020-02-01 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Laurent Macle; John Cairns; Kori Leblanc; Teresa Tsang; Allan Skanes; Jafna L Cox; Jeff S Healey; Alan Bell; Louise Pilote; Jason G Andrade; L Brent Mitchell; Clare Atzema; David Gladstone; Mike Sharma; Subodh Verma; Stuart Connolly; Paul Dorian; Ratika Parkash; Mario Talajic; Stanley Nattel; Atul Verma Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2016-09-06 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Clare L Atzema; Cynthia A Jackevicius; Alice Chong; Paul Dorian; Noah M Ivers; Ratika Parkash; Peter C Austin Journal: CMAJ Date: 2019-12-09 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Ian G Stiell; M Sean McMurtry; Andrew McRae; Ratika Parkash; Frank Scheuermeyer; Clare L Atzema; Allan Skanes Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2019-06-13 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Jason G Andrade; Martin Aguilar; Clare Atzema; Alan Bell; John A Cairns; Christopher C Cheung; Jafna L Cox; Paul Dorian; David J Gladstone; Jeff S Healey; Paul Khairy; Kori Leblanc; M Sean McMurtry; L Brent Mitchell; Girish M Nair; Stanley Nattel; Ratika Parkash; Louise Pilote; Roopinder K Sandhu; Jean-François Sarrazin; Mukul Sharma; Allan C Skanes; Mario Talajic; Teresa S M Tsang; Atul Verma; Subodh Verma; Richard Whitlock; D George Wyse; Laurent Macle Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2020-10-22 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Ian G Stiell; Kerstin de Wit; Frank X Scheuermeyer; Alain Vadeboncoeur; Paul Angaran; Debra Eagles; Ian D Graham; Clare L Atzema; Patrick M Archambault; Troy Tebbenham; Andrew D McRae; Warren J Cheung; Ratika Parkash; Marc W Deyell; Geneviève Baril; Rick Mann; Rupinder Sahsi; Suneel Upadhye; Erica Brown; Jennifer Brinkhurst; Christian Chabot; Allan Skanes Journal: CJEM Date: 2021-08-12 Impact factor: 2.410
Authors: Bory Kea; E Margaret Warton; Dustin W Ballard; Dustin G Mark; Mary E Reed; Adina S Rauchwerger; Steven R Offerman; Uli K Chettipally; Patricia C Ramos; Daphne D Le; David S Glaser; David R Vinson Journal: J Atr Fibrillation Date: 2021-02-28
Authors: Ian G Stiell; Kerstin de Wit; Frank X Scheuermeyer; Alain Vadeboncoeur; Paul Angaran; Debra Eagles; Ian D Graham; Clare L Atzema; Patrick M Archambault; Troy Tebbenham; Andrew D McRae; Warren J Cheung; Ratika Parkash; Marc W Deyell; Geneviève Baril; Rick Mann; Rupinder Sahsi; Suneel Upadhye; Erica Brown; Jennifer Brinkhurst; Christian Chabot; Allan Skanes Journal: CJEM Date: 2021-08-12 Impact factor: 2.410