Literature DB >> 34383280

2021 CAEP Acute Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter Best Practices Checklist.

Ian G Stiell1,2,3, Kerstin de Wit4,5, Frank X Scheuermeyer6, Alain Vadeboncoeur7,8, Paul Angaran9, Debra Eagles10,11, Ian D Graham11, Clare L Atzema12,13, Patrick M Archambault14, Troy Tebbenham15, Andrew D McRae16, Warren J Cheung10,11, Ratika Parkash17, Marc W Deyell18, Geneviève Baril19, Rick Mann20, Rupinder Sahsi21,22, Suneel Upadhye23, Erica Brown11, Jennifer Brinkhurst11, Christian Chabot24, Allan Skanes25.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34383280      PMCID: PMC8423652          DOI: 10.1007/s43678-021-00167-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CJEM        ISSN: 1481-8035            Impact factor:   2.410


× No keyword cloud information.

A. Assessment and risk stratification

1. Is AF/AFL with rapid ventricular response a primary arrhythmia or secondary to medical causes?

Rapid rate secondary to medical causes (usually in patients with pre-existing/permanent AF) e.g., sepsis, bleeding, PE, heart failure, ACS, etc.: Investigate and treat underlying causes aggressively Cardioversion may be harmful Avoid aggressive rate control Primary arrhythmia, e.g., sudden onset of AF/AFL

2. Is the patient unstable?

Instability due to acute primary AF/AFL is uncommon, except for AF with rapid ventricular pre-excitation (WPW): Hypotension: SBP < 90 mmHg, or signs of shock (e.g., altered mental status) Cardiac ischemia: ongoing severe chest pain or marked ST depression (> 2 mm) on ECG despite therapy Pulmonary edema: significant dyspnea, crackles, and hypoxia Treat unstable patient: Urgent electrical CV if onset < 48 h or WPW Consider trial of rate control if onset > 48 h

3. Is it safe to cardiovert this patient with primary AF/AFL?

When it is safe, rhythm control is usually preferable to rate control: patient quality of life, shorter length of stay, fewer hospital resources It is safe to cardiovert if: The patient has been adequately anticoagulated for a minimum of 3 weeks, OR The patient is not adequately anticoagulated for > 3 weeks, has no history of stroke or TIA, AND does not have valvular heart disease, AND: Onset < 12 h ago, OR Onset 12—48 h ago and there are <2 of these CHADS-65 criteria (age ≥ 65, diabetes, hypertension, heart failure), OR Negative for thrombus on transesophageal echocardiography Consider delaying cardioversion if recent history of frequent palpitations Rate control acceptable, per patient and physician preference e.g. older patients who are minimally symptomatic with a mildly elevated HR

B. Rate and rhythm control

4. Rate control for patients for whom cardioversion is unsafe

Calcium channel- and beta-blockers considered first line: If patient already taking oral calcium channel- or beta- blocker, choose same drug group first If difficulty achieving adequate rate control, consider using the other first-line agent, IV digoxin, or cardiology consultation Calcium channel blocker: Avoid if acute heart failure or known LV dysfunction (POCUS may be helpful) Diltiazem 0.25 mg/kg IV over 10 min; repeat q15-20 min at 0.35 mg/kg up to 3 doses Start 30–60 mg PO within 30 min of effective IV rate control Discharge on 30-60 mg QID or Extended Release 120–240 mg once daily Beta blocker: Metoprolol 2.5–5 mg IV over 2 min, repeat q15–20 min up to 3 doses Start 25–50 mg PO within 30 min of effective IV rate control Discharge on 25–50 mg BID Digoxin is second line, as slow onset: 0.25–0.5 mg loading dose, then 0.25 mg IV q4–6 h to a max of 1.5 mg over 24 h; caution in renal failure Consider first line if hypotension or acute HF Heart rate target: < 100 bpm at rest, < 110 walking

5. Rhythm control

Either pharmacological or electrical cardioversion acceptable, per patient and physician preference: Consider previous episodes; if one doesn’t work, try the other Pre-treatment with rate control agents not recommended – ineffective and delays treatment Pharmacological cardioversion: Procainamide IV—15 mg/kg in 500 ml NS over 60 min, maximum 1500 mg Avoid if SBP < 100 mm Hg or QTc > 500 ms Interrupt infusion if BP drops or QRS lengthens visibly (e.g., > 30%) Check QTc after conversion Amiodarone IV not recommended—slow, low efficacy Less commonly used options include: vernakalant IV, ibutilide IV, propafenone PO and flecainide PO Electrical cardioversion Setup—minimum 2 staff (RN/RRT; RN/RN), 2nd physician ideal Procedural sedation per local practice—e.g., Fentanyl, Propofol Pad/paddle position—either antero-lateral or antero-posterior acceptable: Avoid sternum, breast tissue If failure, apply pressure with paddles, try the other position Start with 150–200 J synchronized—avoid starting with low energy level Many patients can be discharged as soon as 30 min after conversion if treated with IV procainamide or ECV

6. Rapid ventricular pre-excitation (WPW)

Urgent electrical CV usually required Procainamide IV if stable AV nodal blocking agents contraindicated: digoxin, calcium channel-, beta-blockers, adenosine, amiodarone

C. Stroke prevention

7. Who requires anticoagulation?

Antithrombotic therapy prescribed at discharge is for long-term stroke prevention For OAC contraindications see the ‘McMaster Checklist’ If CHADS-65 positive (any of age ≥ 65, diabetes, hypertension, heart failure, stroke/TIA) initiate OAC prior to discharge; consider shared decision making to include patients’ preferences with regards to risks and benefits: DOACs preferred over warfarin Use warfarin (DOACs contraindicated) if mechanical valve, moderate-severe mitral stenosis, severe renal impairment (CrCl < 30 ml/min) If stable CAD, discontinue ASA If CAD with other anti-platelets or recent PCI < 12 months, consult cardiology If CHADS-65 negative, OAC might be considered for a 4-week period after careful consideration of risks and benefits and a shared decision-making process with the patient; ensure patient is aware anticoagulation will be discontinued after 4 weeks CHADS-65 negative and stable coronary, aortic, or peripheral vascular disease, ensure patient is on ASA 81 mg daily Patients already taking anti-platelet agents require follow-up with cardiology If TEE-guided CV, must initiate DOAC immediately × 4 weeks If warfarin, need LMW heparin bridging Patients who convert spontaneously before ED treatment should generally be prescribed OAC according to the CHADS-65 criteria

8. DOACs and warfarin

See Thrombosis Canada App for details; avoid in pregnancy, breastfeeding Consult nephrology or thrombosis if CrCl < 30 ml/min Provincial formularies may require Limited Use codes, e.g. failure of warfarin or INR monitoring not possible: Dabigatran—150 mg BID; use 110 mg BID if age > 80 years, or > 75 years with bleeding risk Rivaroxaban—20 mg daily; use 15 mg daily if CrCl 30–49 ml/min Apixaban—5 mg BID; use 2.5 mg BID if two of: (1) serum creatinine > 133 umol/L, (2) age > 80 years, or (3) body weight < 60 kg Edoxaban—60 mg daily; use 30 mg daily if CrCl 30–50 ml/min or weight < 60 kg; important drug interactions Warfarin Initiate warfarin: 5 mg daily; (1–2 mg daily if frail, low weight, Asian descent): Heparin bridging not required unless TEE-guided CV Arrange for INR blood test and review after 3 or 4 doses of warfarin. Subsequent warfarin doses should be communicated to patient on the day of the INR test

D. Disposition and follow-up

9. Admission to hospital

Patients rarely require hospital admission for uncomplicated acute AF/AFL unless they: Are highly symptomatic despite adequate treatment Have ACS with significant chest pain, troponin rise, and ECG changes No need to routinely measure troponin, small demand rise expected Have acute heart failure not improved with ED treatment

10. Follow-up issues

Recommend physician follow-up < 7 days if new warfarin or rate control meds Recommend cardiology / internal medicine follow-up in 4–6 weeks if not already followed or if new medications prescribed Provide handout (available from Thrombosis Canada) describing new medication, atrial fibrillation, and follow-up; early renal function monitoring if new DOAC Do not initiate anti-arrhythmic agents like amiodarone or propafenone in the ED If sinus rhythm achieved, generally no need to initiate beta- or calcium channel-blockers

Background and methods

The 2021 CAEP Acute Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter Best Practices Checklist has been updated from the original version published in 2018 [1]. These checklists have been created to assist emergency physicians in Canada and elsewhere manage patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with acute/recent-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) or flutter (AFL). The checklist focuses on symptomatic patients with acute AF or AFL, i.e. those with recent-onset episodes (either first detected, recurrent paroxysmal or recurrent persistent episodes) where the onset is generally less than 48 h but may be as much as seven days. These are the most common acute arrhythmia cases requiring care in the ED. Canadian emergency physicians are known for publishing widely on this topic and for managing these patients quickly and efficiently in the ED [2, 3, 4]. The 2018 Checklist project was funded by a research grant from the Cardiac Arrhythmia Network and the resultant guidelines were formally endorsed by the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP). We chose to adapt, for use by emergency physicians, existing high-quality clinical practice guidelines (CPG) previously developed by the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) [5-7]. These CPGs were developed and revised using a rigorous process that is based on the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system of evaluation [8]. With the assistance of our PhD methodologist (IG), we used the recently developed Canadian CAN-IMPLEMENT© process adapted from the ADAPTE Collaboration [9, 10]. We created an Advisory Committee consisting of ten academic emergency physicians (one also expert in thrombosis medicine), four community emergency physicians, three cardiologists, one PhD methodologist, and two patients. Our focus was four key elements of ED care: assessment and risk stratification, rhythm and rate control, short-term and long-term stroke prevention, and disposition and follow-up. The advisory committee communicated by face-to-face meetings, teleconferences, and email. The checklist was prepared and revised through a process of feedback and discussion on all issues by all panel members. These revisions went through ten iterations until consensus was achieved. We then circulated the draft checklist for comment to approximately 300 emergency medicine and cardiology colleagues. Finally, the CAEP Standards Committee posted the Checklist online for all CAEP members to provide feedback (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Overview of 2021 CAEP AF/AFL best practices checklist

Overview of 2021 CAEP AF/AFL best practices checklist Early in 2021 the same Checklist Advisory Committee reconvened (with one additional academic cardiologist) to discuss updates based upon new evidence [3, 4, 11], the 2018 and 2020 CCS guidelines [12, 13], and several commentaries that had expressed the concern of the Canadian ED community [14, 15]. The Advisory Committee met twice virtually and reached consensus on updates through repeated email exchanges. The panelists then sought further feedback from their own colleagues in emergency medicine and cardiology. Finally, the 2021 Checklist was posted by CAEP for further member feedback prior to final approval. The panel continues to believe that, overall, a strategy of ED cardioversion and discharge home from the ED is preferable from both the patient and the healthcare system perspective, for most patients. Many notable revisions were incorporated, including: The safety of urgent cardioversion for acute AF/AFL depends upon anticoagulation status, prior stroke, valvular heart disease, time since onset, and CHADS criteria. Patients presenting between 12 and 48 h may only be cardioverted if they have 0 or 1 of the CHADS-65 criteria. We found that the CCS reference to CHADS2 Scale problematic as most ED physicians no longer use that scale. Anticoagulation for CHADS-65 positive patients should be initiated in the ED unless there are contradictions as per the “McMaster Checklist” created by Dr. de Wit. We disagree with the CCS suggestion of 4 weeks of anticoagulation for patients who are CHADS-65 negative as this was a weak recommendation per the GRADE system, based upon low quality evidence. We suggest that oral anticoagulation might be considered for a 4-week period after careful consideration of risks and benefits and a shared decision-making process with the patient. Our hope is that the 2021 CAEP Acute Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter Best Practices Checklist will standardize and improve care of AF and AFL in large and small EDs alike. We believe that these patients can be managed rapidly and safely, with early ED discharge and return to normal activities.
  13 in total

1.  A Multicenter Randomized Trial to Evaluate a Chemical-first or Electrical-first Cardioversion Strategy for Patients With Uncomplicated Acute Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Frank X Scheuermeyer; Gary Andolfatto; Jim Christenson; Cristina Villa-Roel; Brian Rowe
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 3.451

2.  2014 focused update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Atul Verma; John A Cairns; L Brent Mitchell; Laurent Macle; Ian G Stiell; David Gladstone; Michael Sean McMurtry; Stuart Connolly; Jafna L Cox; Paul Dorian; Noah Ivers; Kori Leblanc; Stanley Nattel; Jeff S Healey
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 5.223

3.  Early or Delayed Cardioversion in Recent-Onset Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Nikki A H A Pluymaekers; Elton A M P Dudink; Justin G L M Luermans; Joan G Meeder; Timo Lenderink; Jos Widdershoven; Jeroen J J Bucx; Michiel Rienstra; Otto Kamp; Jurren M Van Opstal; Marco Alings; Anton Oomen; Charles J Kirchhof; Vincent F Van Dijk; Hemanth Ramanna; Anho Liem; Lukas R Dekker; Brigitte A B Essers; Jan G P Tijssen; Isabelle C Van Gelder; Harry J G M Crijns
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Electrical versus pharmacological cardioversion for emergency department patients with acute atrial fibrillation (RAFF2): a partial factorial randomised trial.

Authors:  Ian G Stiell; Marco L A Sivilotti; Monica Taljaard; David Birnie; Alain Vadeboncoeur; Corinne M Hohl; Andrew D McRae; Brian H Rowe; Robert J Brison; Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy; Laurent Macle; Bjug Borgundvaag; Judy Morris; Eric Mercier; Catherine M Clement; Jennifer Brinkhurst; Connor Sheehan; Erica Brown; Marie-Joe Nemnom; George A Wells; Jeffrey J Perry
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  2016 Focused Update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Laurent Macle; John Cairns; Kori Leblanc; Teresa Tsang; Allan Skanes; Jafna L Cox; Jeff S Healey; Alan Bell; Louise Pilote; Jason G Andrade; L Brent Mitchell; Clare Atzema; David Gladstone; Mike Sharma; Subodh Verma; Stuart Connolly; Paul Dorian; Ratika Parkash; Mario Talajic; Stanley Nattel; Atul Verma
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 5.223

6.  Prescribing of oral anticoagulants in the emergency department and subsequent long-term use by older adults with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Clare L Atzema; Cynthia A Jackevicius; Alice Chong; Paul Dorian; Noah M Ivers; Ratika Parkash; Peter C Austin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Canadian Cardiovascular Society atrial fibrillation guidelines 2010: management of recent-onset atrial fibrillation and flutter in the emergency department.

Authors:  Ian G Stiell; Laurent Macle
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.223

8.  Safe Cardioversion for Patients With Acute-Onset Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter: Practical Concerns and Considerations.

Authors:  Ian G Stiell; M Sean McMurtry; Andrew McRae; Ratika Parkash; Frank Scheuermeyer; Clare L Atzema; Allan Skanes
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 5.223

9.  The 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Comprehensive Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Jason G Andrade; Martin Aguilar; Clare Atzema; Alan Bell; John A Cairns; Christopher C Cheung; Jafna L Cox; Paul Dorian; David J Gladstone; Jeff S Healey; Paul Khairy; Kori Leblanc; M Sean McMurtry; L Brent Mitchell; Girish M Nair; Stanley Nattel; Ratika Parkash; Louise Pilote; Roopinder K Sandhu; Jean-François Sarrazin; Mukul Sharma; Allan C Skanes; Mario Talajic; Teresa S M Tsang; Atul Verma; Subodh Verma; Richard Whitlock; D George Wyse; Laurent Macle
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 10.  2021 CAEP Acute Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter Best Practices Checklist.

Authors:  Ian G Stiell; Kerstin de Wit; Frank X Scheuermeyer; Alain Vadeboncoeur; Paul Angaran; Debra Eagles; Ian D Graham; Clare L Atzema; Patrick M Archambault; Troy Tebbenham; Andrew D McRae; Warren J Cheung; Ratika Parkash; Marc W Deyell; Geneviève Baril; Rick Mann; Rupinder Sahsi; Suneel Upadhye; Erica Brown; Jennifer Brinkhurst; Christian Chabot; Allan Skanes
Journal:  CJEM       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 2.410

View more
  5 in total

1.  Which Recommendations Are You Using? A Survey of Emergency Physician Management of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Ryan C Daniel; Clare L Atzema; Dennis D Cho; Philip J Davis; Lorne L Costello
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2022-01-23

2.  Predictors of Acute Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter Hospitalization across 7 U.S. Emergency Departments: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Bory Kea; E Margaret Warton; Dustin W Ballard; Dustin G Mark; Mary E Reed; Adina S Rauchwerger; Steven R Offerman; Uli K Chettipally; Patricia C Ramos; Daphne D Le; David S Glaser; David R Vinson
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2021-02-28

3.  Effect of Early Pharmacologic Cardioversion vs. Non-early Cardioversion in the Patients With Recent-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Within 4-Week Follow-Up Period: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yan Tang; Yujie Wang; Xuejing Sun; Yunmin Shi; Suzhen Liu; Weihong Jiang; Hong Yuan; Yao Lu; Jingjing Cai; Junru Wu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-11

4.  Anaphylactic Shock as a Rare Side Effect of Intravenous Amiodarone.

Authors:  Aisha Batool; Khadija Batool; Hafsa Habib; Shahzad Chaudhry
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-11

Review 5.  2021 CAEP Acute Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter Best Practices Checklist.

Authors:  Ian G Stiell; Kerstin de Wit; Frank X Scheuermeyer; Alain Vadeboncoeur; Paul Angaran; Debra Eagles; Ian D Graham; Clare L Atzema; Patrick M Archambault; Troy Tebbenham; Andrew D McRae; Warren J Cheung; Ratika Parkash; Marc W Deyell; Geneviève Baril; Rick Mann; Rupinder Sahsi; Suneel Upadhye; Erica Brown; Jennifer Brinkhurst; Christian Chabot; Allan Skanes
Journal:  CJEM       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 2.410

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.