Literature DB >> 30883054

Early or Delayed Cardioversion in Recent-Onset Atrial Fibrillation.

Nikki A H A Pluymaekers1, Elton A M P Dudink1, Justin G L M Luermans1, Joan G Meeder1, Timo Lenderink1, Jos Widdershoven1, Jeroen J J Bucx1, Michiel Rienstra1, Otto Kamp1, Jurren M Van Opstal1, Marco Alings1, Anton Oomen1, Charles J Kirchhof1, Vincent F Van Dijk1, Hemanth Ramanna1, Anho Liem1, Lukas R Dekker1, Brigitte A B Essers1, Jan G P Tijssen1, Isabelle C Van Gelder1, Harry J G M Crijns1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation commonly undergo immediate restoration of sinus rhythm by pharmacologic or electrical cardioversion. However, whether immediate restoration of sinus rhythm is necessary is not known, since atrial fibrillation often terminates spontaneously.
METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned patients with hemodynamically stable, recent-onset (<36 hours), symptomatic atrial fibrillation in the emergency department to be treated with a wait-and-see approach (delayed-cardioversion group) or early cardioversion. The wait-and-see approach involved initial treatment with rate-control medication only and delayed cardioversion if the atrial fibrillation did not resolve within 48 hours. The primary end point was the presence of sinus rhythm at 4 weeks. Noninferiority would be shown if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for the between-group difference in the primary end point in percentage points was more than -10.
RESULTS: The presence of sinus rhythm at 4 weeks occurred in 193 of 212 patients (91%) in the delayed-cardioversion group and in 202 of 215 (94%) in the early-cardioversion group (between-group difference, -2.9 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -8.2 to 2.2; P = 0.005 for noninferiority). In the delayed-cardioversion group, conversion to sinus rhythm within 48 hours occurred spontaneously in 150 of 218 patients (69%) and after delayed cardioversion in 61 patients (28%). In the early-cardioversion group, conversion to sinus rhythm occurred spontaneously before the initiation of cardioversion in 36 of 219 patients (16%) and after cardioversion in 171 patients (78%). Among the patients who completed remote monitoring during 4 weeks of follow-up, a recurrence of atrial fibrillation occurred in 49 of 164 patients (30%) in the delayed-cardioversion group and in 50 of 171 (29%) in the early-cardioversion group. Within 4 weeks after randomization, cardiovascular complications occurred in 10 patients and 8 patients, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients presenting to the emergency department with recent-onset, symptomatic atrial fibrillation, a wait-and-see approach was noninferior to early cardioversion in achieving a return to sinus rhythm at 4 weeks. (Funded by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development and others; RACE 7 ACWAS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02248753.).
Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30883054     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1900353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  26 in total

1.  Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Atrial Fibrillation Treatment and Outcomes among Dialysis Patients in the United States.

Authors:  Salina P Waddy; Allen J Solomon; Adan Z Becerra; Julia B Ward; Kevin E Chan; Chyng-Wen Fwu; Jenna M Norton; Paul W Eggers; Kevin C Abbott; Paul L Kimmel
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 2.  Highlights from the 2019 American College of Cardiology Scientific Sessions in New Orleans, LA.

Authors:  Dylan L Steen
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Is delayed cardioversion the better approach in recent-onset atrial fibrillation? No.

Authors:  Alessandro Capucci; Paolo Compagnucci
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 4.  How to Optimize Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  K E Juhani Airaksinen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-12       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Is delayed cardioversion the better approach in recent-onset atrial fibrillation? Yes.

Authors:  Giovanni Luca Botto; Giovanni Tortora
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 3.397

6.  Delaying cardioversion for recent-onset AF.

Authors:  Karina Huynh
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 32.419

7.  Thromboembolic events following cardioversion of acute atrial fibrillation and flutter: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Brenton M Wong; Jeffrey J Perry; Wei Cheng; Bo Zheng; Kevin Guo; Monica Taljaard; Allan C Skanes; Ian G Stiell
Journal:  CJEM       Date:  2021-03-14       Impact factor: 2.410

8.  Pharmacologic Cardioversion in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Dimitris Tsiachris; Ioannis Doundoulakis; Eirini Pagkalidou; Athanasios Kordalis; Spyridon Deftereos; Konstantinos A Gatzoulis; Konstantinos Tsioufis; Christodoulos Stefanadis
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 9.  Rate control strategies for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Muath Alobaida; Abdullah Alrumayh
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 4.709

10.  Does Duration of Symptoms Reliably Predict Detection of Left Atrial Thrombus in Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Ali Sakhnini; Shemy Carasso; Zyad Abu Znait; Shalabi Amjad; Lisa Grossman; Ibrahim Marai
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2021-08-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.