Jing Liu1,2,3, Baiba K Gillard3,4, Dedipya Yelamanchili3, Antonio M Gotto3,4, Corina Rosales3,4, Henry J Pownall3,4. 1. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China (J.L.). 2. Now with the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery of The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China (J.L.). 3. Center for Bioenergetics, Houston Methodist Research Institute, TX (J.L., B.K.G., D.Y., A.M.G., C.R., H.J.P.). 4. Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY (B.K.G., A.M.G., C.R., H.J.P.).
Abstract
Objective: Overall and atherosclerosis-associated mortality is elevated in humans with very high HDL (high-density lipoprotein) cholesterol concentrations. Mice with a deficiency of the HDL receptor, Scarb1 (scavenger receptor class B type 1), are a robust model of this phenotype and exhibit several additional pathologies. We hypothesized that the previously reported high plasma concentration of free cholesterol (FC)-rich HDL in Scarb1-/- mice produces a state of high HDL-FC bioavailability that increases whole-body FC and dysfunction in multiple tissue sites. Approach and Results: The higher mol% FC in Scarb1-/- versus WT (wild type) HDL (41.1 versus 16.0 mol%) affords greater FC bioavailability for transfer to multiple sites. Plasma clearance of autologous HDL-FC mass was faster in WT versus Scarb1-/- mice. FC influx from Scarb1-/- HDL to LDL (low-density lipoprotein) and J774 macrophages was greater ([almost equal to]4x) than that from WT HDL, whereas FC efflux capacity was similar. The higher mol% FC of ovaries, erythrocytes, heart, and macrophages of Scarb1-/- versus WT mice is associated with previously reported female infertility, impaired cell maturation, cardiac dysfunction, and atherosclerosis. The FC contents of other tissues were similar in the two genotypes, and these tissues were not associated with any overt pathology. In addition to the differences between WT versus Scarb1-/- mice, there were many sex-dependent differences in tissue-lipid composition and plasma FC clearance rates. Conclusions: Higher HDL-FC bioavailability among Scarb1-/- versus WT mice drives increased FC content of multiple cell sites and is a potential biomarker that is mechanistically linked to multiple pathologies.
Objective: Overall and atherosclerosis-associated mortality is elevated in humans with very high HDL (high-density lipoprotein) cholesterol concentrations. Mice with a deficiency of the HDL receptor, Scarb1 (scavenger receptor class B type 1), are a robust model of this phenotype and exhibit several additional pathologies. We hypothesized that the previously reported high plasma concentration of free cholesterol (FC)-rich HDL in Scarb1-/- mice produces a state of high HDL-FC bioavailability that increases whole-body FC and dysfunction in multiple tissue sites. Approach and Results: The higher mol% FC in Scarb1-/- versus WT (wild type) HDL (41.1 versus 16.0 mol%) affords greater FC bioavailability for transfer to multiple sites. Plasma clearance of autologous HDL-FC mass was faster in WT versus Scarb1-/- mice. FC influx from Scarb1-/- HDL to LDL (low-density lipoprotein) and J774 macrophages was greater ([almost equal to]4x) than that from WT HDL, whereas FC efflux capacity was similar. The higher mol% FC of ovaries, erythrocytes, heart, and macrophages of Scarb1-/- versus WT mice is associated with previously reported female infertility, impaired cell maturation, cardiac dysfunction, and atherosclerosis. The FC contents of other tissues were similar in the two genotypes, and these tissues were not associated with any overt pathology. In addition to the differences between WT versus Scarb1-/- mice, there were many sex-dependent differences in tissue-lipid composition and plasma FC clearance rates. Conclusions: Higher HDL-FC bioavailability among Scarb1-/- versus WT mice drives increased FC content of multiple cell sites and is a potential biomarker that is mechanistically linked to multiple pathologies.
Authors: Baiba K Gillard; Corina Rosales; Biju K Pillai; Hu Yu Lin; Harry S Courtney; Henry J Pownall Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2010-10-25 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Anand Rohatgi; Amit Khera; Jarett D Berry; Edward G Givens; Colby R Ayers; Kyle E Wedin; Ian J Neeland; Ivan S Yuhanna; Daniel R Rader; James A de Lemos; Philip W Shaul Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-11-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Dennis T Ko; David A Alter; Helen Guo; Maria Koh; Geoffrey Lau; Peter C Austin; Gillian L Booth; William Hogg; Cynthia A Jackevicius; Douglas S Lee; Harindra C Wijeysundera; John T Wilkins; Jack V Tu Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2016-11-08 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Seth G Thacker; Xavier Rousset; Safiya Esmail; Abdalrahman Zarzour; Xueting Jin; Heidi L Collins; Maureen Sampson; John Stonik; Stephen Demosky; Daniela A Malide; Lita Freeman; Boris L Vaisman; Howard S Kruth; Steven J Adelman; Alan T Remaley Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2015-05-11 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: D Huszar; M L Varban; F Rinninger; R Feeley; T Arai; V Fairchild-Huntress; M J Donovan; A R Tall Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Jan Freark de Boer; Marleen Schonewille; Arne Dikkers; Martijn Koehorst; Rick Havinga; Folkert Kuipers; Uwe J F Tietge; Albert K Groen Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2017-02-23 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Baiba K Gillard; Perla J Rodriguez; David W Fields; Joe L Raya; William R Lagor; Corina Rosales; Harry S Courtney; Antonio M Gotto; Henry J Pownall Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Date: 2015-12-18
Authors: Benjamin Bowe; Yan Xie; Hong Xian; Sumitra Balasubramanian; Mohamed A Zayed; Ziyad Al-Aly Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 8.237