Jan Freark de Boer1, Marleen Schonewille2, Arne Dikkers2, Martijn Koehorst2, Rick Havinga2, Folkert Kuipers2, Uwe J F Tietge2, Albert K Groen2. 1. From the Departments of Pediatrics (J.F.d.B., M.S., A.D., M.K., R.H., F.K., U.J.F.T., A.K.G.) and Laboratory Medicine (F.K., A.K.G.), University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands. j.f.de.boer@umcg.nl. 2. From the Departments of Pediatrics (J.F.d.B., M.S., A.D., M.K., R.H., F.K., U.J.F.T., A.K.G.) and Laboratory Medicine (F.K., A.K.G.), University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Reverse cholesterol transport comprises efflux of cholesterol from macrophages and its subsequent removal from the body with the feces and thereby protects against formation of atherosclerotic plaques. Because of lack of suitable animal models that allow for evaluation of the respective contributions of biliary cholesterol secretion and transintestinal cholesterol excretion (TICE) to macrophage reverse cholesterol transport under physiological conditions, the relative importance of both pathways in this process has remained controversial. APPROACH AND RESULTS: To separate cholesterol traffic via the biliary route from TICE, bile flow was mutually diverted between rats, continuously, for 3 days. Groups of 2 weight-matched rats were designated as a pair, and both rats were equipped with cannulas in the bile duct and duodenum. Bile from rat 1 was diverted to the duodenum of rat 2, whereas bile from rat 2 was rerouted to the duodenum of rat 1. Next, rat 1 was injected with [3H]cholesterol-loaded macrophages. [3H]Cholesterol secreted via the biliary route was consequently diverted to rat 2 and could thus be quantified from the feces of that rat. On the other hand, [3H]cholesterol tracer in the feces of rat 1 reflected macrophage-derived cholesterol excreted via TICE. Using this setup, we found that 63% of the label secreted with the fecal neutral sterols had travelled via the biliary route, whereas 37% was excreted via TICE. CONCLUSIONS: TICE and biliary cholesterol secretion contribute to macrophage reverse cholesterol transport in rats. The majority of macrophage-derived cholesterol is however excreted via the hepatobiliary route.
OBJECTIVE: Reverse cholesterol transport comprises efflux of cholesterol from macrophages and its subsequent removal from the body with the feces and thereby protects against formation of atherosclerotic plaques. Because of lack of suitable animal models that allow for evaluation of the respective contributions of biliary cholesterol secretion and transintestinal cholesterol excretion (TICE) to macrophage reverse cholesterol transport under physiological conditions, the relative importance of both pathways in this process has remained controversial. APPROACH AND RESULTS: To separate cholesterol traffic via the biliary route from TICE, bile flow was mutually diverted between rats, continuously, for 3 days. Groups of 2 weight-matched rats were designated as a pair, and both rats were equipped with cannulas in the bile duct and duodenum. Bile from rat 1 was diverted to the duodenum of rat 2, whereas bile from rat 2 was rerouted to the duodenum of rat 1. Next, rat 1 was injected with [3H]cholesterol-loaded macrophages. [3H]Cholesterol secreted via the biliary route was consequently diverted to rat 2 and could thus be quantified from the feces of that rat. On the other hand, [3H]cholesterol tracer in the feces of rat 1 reflected macrophage-derived cholesterol excreted via TICE. Using this setup, we found that 63% of the label secreted with the fecal neutral sterols had travelled via the biliary route, whereas 37% was excreted via TICE. CONCLUSIONS: TICE and biliary cholesterol secretion contribute to macrophage reverse cholesterol transport in rats. The majority of macrophage-derived cholesterol is however excreted via the hepatobiliary route.
Authors: Jianing Li; Sonja S Pijut; Yuhuan Wang; Ailing Ji; Rupinder Kaur; Ryan E Temel; Deneys R van der Westhuyzen; Gregory A Graf Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2019-08-29 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Ryunosuke Ohkawa; Hann Low; Nigora Mukhamedova; Ying Fu; Shao-Jui Lai; Mai Sasaoka; Ayuko Hara; Azusa Yamazaki; Takahiro Kameda; Yuna Horiuchi; Peter J Meikle; Gerard Pernes; Graeme Lancaster; Michael Ditiatkovski; Paul Nestel; Boris Vaisman; Denis Sviridov; Andrew Murphy; Alan T Remaley; Dmitri Sviridov; Minoru Tozuka Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2020-09-09 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: Hong S Lu; Ann Marie Schmidt; Robert A Hegele; Nigel Mackman; Daniel J Rader; Christian Weber; Alan Daugherty Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Annabelle Rodriguez; Bernardo L Trigatti; Chieko Mineo; Darcy Knaack; John T Wilkins; Daisy Sahoo; Bela F Asztalos; Samia Mora; Marina Cuchel; Henry J Pownall; Corina Rosales; Pascal Bernatchez; Amanda Ribeiro Martins da Silva; Godfrey S Getz; Jacob L Barber; Gregory C Shearer; Angela M Zivkovic; Uwe J F Tietge; Frank M Sacks; Margery A Connelly; Michael N Oda; W Sean Davidson; Mary G Sorci-Thomas; Tomas Vaisar; Giacomo Ruotolo; Kasey C Vickers; Catherine Martel Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2019-10-10 Impact factor: 8.311