Literature DB >> 34374874

Risks and Benefits of Adolescent Girls' Participation in Online Sexting Survey Research.

Xiangyu Tao1, Elise Bragard2, Celia B Fisher2,3.   

Abstract

The increasingly ubiquitous use of sexting among adolescent girls underscores the importance of empirical data on their sexting behaviors, motivations, and outcomes. To date, the majority of sexting studies have been conducted online; however, little is known about the extent to which responding to such socially sensitive questions may cause participant discomfort or distress. Research on this question is critical since in the absence of empirical data, institutional review boards (IRBs) may permit or place restrictions on online sexting studies based on an under- or overestimation of adolescent participation risk. The current online study asked 210 girls (aged 14-18 years, 55% non-Hispanic White, with sexting experience in the past 12 months) who previously registered to take online surveys on (1) their anticipated comfort in responding to a sexting survey include items on sexting motivations, positive and negative sexting consequences, and related sexual behaviors; (2) their perceptions of sexting research benefits/harms; and (3) comfort discussing similar topics in everyday life and with health professionals. Overall, participants were comfortable responding to sexting survey questions, rated sexting research as high benefits and low risks, and felt about the same as or more comfortable completing a sexting survey than discussing similar topics with peers, parents, or healthcare professionals. Findings suggest that anonymous online sexting studies can be classified as minimal risk research for adolescent girls and provide empirical support for IRB decisions to waive guardian permission for participation in such studies.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent girls; Ethics; Minimal risk; Sexting; Sexual behavior

Year:  2021        PMID: 34374874     DOI: 10.1007/s10508-021-02003-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  23 in total

1.  "When It Deviates It Becomes Harassment, Doesn't It?" A Qualitative Study on the Definition of Sexting According to Adolescents and Young Adults, Parents, and Teachers.

Authors:  Yara Barrense-Dias; Joan-Carles Surís; Christina Akre
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2019-04-08

2.  Sensitive research with adolescents: just how upsetting are self-report surveys anyway?

Authors:  Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling; Catalina Arata; Natalie O'Brien; David Bowers; Jeffrey Klibert
Journal:  Violence Vict       Date:  2006-08

3.  Association between sexting and sexual coercion among female adolescents.

Authors:  HyeJeong Choi; Joris Van Ouytsel; Jeff R Temple
Journal:  J Adolesc       Date:  2016-10-27

4.  Facilitators and Barriers to Participation in PrEP HIV Prevention Trials Involving Transgender Male and Female Adolescents and Emerging Adults.

Authors:  Celia B Fisher; Adam L Fried; Margaret Desmond; Kathryn Macapagal; Brian Mustanski
Journal:  AIDS Educ Prev       Date:  2017-06

5.  Self-Consent for HIV Prevention Research Involving Sexual and Gender Minority Youth: Reducing Barriers Through Evidence-Based Ethics.

Authors:  Celia B Fisher; Miriam R Arbeit; Melissa S Dumont; Kathryn Macapagal; Brian Mustanski
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  "I Won't Out Myself Just to Do a Survey": Sexual and Gender Minority Adolescents' Perspectives on the Risks and Benefits of Sex Research.

Authors:  Kathryn Macapagal; Ryan Coventry; Miriam R Arbeit; Celia B Fisher; Brian Mustanski
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2016-07-28

7.  Prevalence of Multiple Forms of Sexting Behavior Among Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sheri Madigan; Anh Ly; Christina L Rash; Joris Van Ouytsel; Jeff R Temple
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 16.193

8.  Sexual Health Research With Young Black Men Who Have Sex With Men: Experiences of Benefits and Harms.

Authors:  Renata Arrington-Sanders; Anthony Morgan; Jessica Oidtman; Ann Dao; Margaret Moon; J Dennis Fortenberry; Mary A Ott
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2016-04-04

9.  Adolescent and Parent Willingness to Participate in Microbicide Safety Studies.

Authors:  Marina Catallozzi; Ariel M de Roche; Mei-Chen Hu; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Jane Chang; Lisa S Ipp; Jenny K R Francis; Susan L Rosenthal
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2016-07-02       Impact factor: 1.814

10.  "Free Testing and PrEP without Outing Myself to Parents:" Motivation to participate in oral and injectable PrEP clinical trials among adolescent men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Celia B Fisher; Adam L Fried; Leah Ibrahim Puri; Kathryn Macapagal; Brian Mustanski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.