Literature DB >> 16897911

Sensitive research with adolescents: just how upsetting are self-report surveys anyway?

Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling1, Catalina Arata, Natalie O'Brien, David Bowers, Jeffrey Klibert.   

Abstract

Distress related to answering personal survey questions about drug use, suicidal behavior, and physical and sexual abuse were examined in multiple convenience samples of adolescents. Samples varied in consent procedures utilized (active vs. passive parental consent), data collection setting (school vs. juvenile justice), developmental level (middle school vs. high school). Participation rates differed across consent procedures (e.g., 93% with passive vs. 62% with active parental consent). Results indicated that small percentages of adolescents in every sample reported frequently feeling upset while completing the survey (range 2.5% to 7.6%). Age, race, gender, and data collection strategy did not emerge as significant predictors of feeling upset. Instead, as hypothesized, adolescents reporting a history of suicidal ideation or attempt, illicit drug use, or experiences of physical or sexual victimization endorsed more frequent feelings of upset while completing the survey than peers without these experiences. Taken together, however, these sensitive event experiences explained only 6.6% of the variance in adolescents' upset ratings. The scientific and ethical implications of these findings are discussed with regard to adolescent participation in survey research about sensitive topics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16897911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Violence Vict        ISSN: 0886-6708


  18 in total

Review 1.  Adolescents' and adults' experiences of being surveyed about violence and abuse: a systematic review of harms, benefits, and regrets.

Authors:  Tracy McClinton Appollis; Crick Lund; Petrus J de Vries; Catherine Mathews
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Protocol design for large-scale cross-sectional studies of sexual abuse and associated factors in individual sports: feasibility study in Swedish athletics.

Authors:  Toomas Timpka; Staffan Janson; Jenny Jacobsson; Joakim Ekberg; Örjan Dahlström; Jan Kowalski; Victor Bargoria; Margo Mountjoy; Carl G Svedin
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Interview and recollection-based research with child disaster survivors: Participation-related changes in emotion and perceptions of participation.

Authors:  Erin P Hambrick; Bridget M O'Connor; Eric M Vernberg
Journal:  Psychol Trauma       Date:  2015-09-21

4.  Does assessing suicidality frequently and repeatedly cause harm? A randomized control study.

Authors:  Mary Kate Law; R Michael Furr; Elizabeth Mayfield Arnold; Malek Mneimne; Caroline Jaquett; William Fleeson
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2015-04-20

Review 5.  Youth self-report of child maltreatment in representative surveys: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jessica Laurin; Caroline Wallace; Jasminka Draca; Sarah Aterman; Lil Tonmyr
Journal:  Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The risk-benefit ratio of studying psychiatric symptoms via daily diary methods.

Authors:  Caitlin Wolford-Clevenger; Mickeah J Hugley; James McNulty; Lawrence Christian Elledge; Karen Cropsey; Gregory L Stuart
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  "I Won't Out Myself Just to Do a Survey": Sexual and Gender Minority Adolescents' Perspectives on the Risks and Benefits of Sex Research.

Authors:  Kathryn Macapagal; Ryan Coventry; Miriam R Arbeit; Celia B Fisher; Brian Mustanski
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2016-07-28

8.  Risks and Benefits of Adolescent Girls' Participation in Online Sexting Survey Research.

Authors:  Xiangyu Tao; Elise Bragard; Celia B Fisher
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-08-10

Review 9.  Development of a policy-relevant child maltreatment research strategy.

Authors:  Harriet L MacMillan; Ellen Jamieson; C Nadine Wathen; Michael H Boyle; Christine A Walsh; John Omura; Jason M Walker; Gregory Lodenquai
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.911

10.  The impact of active consent procedures on nonresponse and nonresponse error in youth survey data: evidence from a new experiment.

Authors:  Matthew W Courser; Stephen R Shamblen; Paul J Lavrakas; David Collins; Paul Ditterline
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  2009-06-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.