Andreas M Hötker1, Raffaele Da Mutten2, Anja Tiessen2, Ender Konukoglu3, Olivio F Donati2. 1. Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. Andreas.Hoetker@usz.ch. 2. Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. 3. Computer Vision Laboratory, Department of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, ETH Zurich, Sternwartstrasse 7, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate an artificial intelligence algorithm to decide on the necessity of dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences (DCE) in prostate MRI. METHODS: This study was approved by the institutional review board and requirement for study-specific informed consent was waived. A convolutional neural network (CNN) was developed on 300 prostate MRI examinations. Consensus of two expert readers on the necessity of DCE acted as reference standard. The CNN was validated in a separate cohort of 100 prostate MRI examinations from the same vendor and 31 examinations from a different vendor. Sensitivity/specificity were calculated using ROC curve analysis and results were compared to decisions made by a radiology technician. RESULTS: The CNN reached a sensitivity of 94.4% and specificity of 68.8% (AUC: 0.88) for the necessity of DCE, correctly assigning 44%/34% of patients to a biparametric/multiparametric protocol. In 2% of all patients, the CNN incorrectly decided on omitting DCE. With a technician reaching a sensitivity of 63.9% and specificity of 89.1%, the use of the CNN would allow for an increase in sensitivity of 30.5%. The CNN achieved an AUC of 0.73 in a set of examinations from a different vendor. CONCLUSIONS: The CNN would have correctly assigned 78% of patients to a biparametric or multiparametric protocol, with only 2% of all patients requiring re-examination to add DCE sequences. Integrating this CNN in clinical routine could render the requirement for on-table monitoring obsolete by performing contrast-enhanced MRI only when needed.
OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate an artificial intelligence algorithm to decide on the necessity of dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences (DCE) in prostate MRI. METHODS: This study was approved by the institutional review board and requirement for study-specific informed consent was waived. A convolutional neural network (CNN) was developed on 300 prostate MRI examinations. Consensus of two expert readers on the necessity of DCE acted as reference standard. The CNN was validated in a separate cohort of 100 prostate MRI examinations from the same vendor and 31 examinations from a different vendor. Sensitivity/specificity were calculated using ROC curve analysis and results were compared to decisions made by a radiology technician. RESULTS: The CNN reached a sensitivity of 94.4% and specificity of 68.8% (AUC: 0.88) for the necessity of DCE, correctly assigning 44%/34% of patients to a biparametric/multiparametric protocol. In 2% of all patients, the CNN incorrectly decided on omitting DCE. With a technician reaching a sensitivity of 63.9% and specificity of 89.1%, the use of the CNN would allow for an increase in sensitivity of 30.5%. The CNN achieved an AUC of 0.73 in a set of examinations from a different vendor. CONCLUSIONS: The CNN would have correctly assigned 78% of patients to a biparametric or multiparametric protocol, with only 2% of all patients requiring re-examination to add DCE sequences. Integrating this CNN in clinical routine could render the requirement for on-table monitoring obsolete by performing contrast-enhanced MRI only when needed.
Authors: Borna K Barth; Pieter J L De Visschere; Alexander Cornelius; Carlos Nicolau; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Daniel Eberli; Olivio F Donati Journal: Radiology Date: 2017-03-27 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Urs J Muehlematter; Irene A Burger; Anton S Becker; Khoschy Schawkat; Andreas M Hötker; Cäcilia S Reiner; Julian Müller; Niels J Rupp; Jan H Rüschoff; Daniel Eberli; Olivio F Donati Journal: Radiology Date: 2019-09-10 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: J Alfred Witjes; Marek Babjuk; Joaquim Bellmunt; H Maxim Bruins; Theo M De Reijke; Maria De Santis; Silke Gillessen; Nicholas James; Steven Maclennan; Juan Palou; Tom Powles; Maria J Ribal; Shahrokh F Shariat; Theo Van Der Kwast; Evanguelos Xylinas; Neeraj Agarwal; Tom Arends; Aristotle Bamias; Alison Birtle; Peter C Black; Bernard H Bochner; Michel Bolla; Joost L Boormans; Alberto Bossi; Alberto Briganti; Iris Brummelhuis; Max Burger; Daniel Castellano; Richard Cathomas; Arturo Chiti; Ananya Choudhury; Eva Compérat; Simon Crabb; Stephane Culine; Berardino De Bari; Willem De Blok; Pieter J L De Visschere; Karel Decaestecker; Konstantinos Dimitropoulos; Jose L Dominguez-Escrig; Stefano Fanti; Valerie Fonteyne; Mark Frydenberg; Jurgen J Futterer; Georgios Gakis; Bogdan Geavlete; Paolo Gontero; Bernhard Grubmüller; Shaista Hafeez; Donna E Hansel; Arndt Hartmann; Dickon Hayne; Ann M Henry; Virginia Hernandez; Harry Herr; Ken Herrmann; Peter Hoskin; Jorge Huguet; Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa; Rob Jones; Ashish M Kamat; Vincent Khoo; Anne E Kiltie; Susanne Krege; Sylvain Ladoire; Pedro C Lara; Annemarie Leliveld; Estefania Linares-Espinós; Vibeke Løgager; Anja Lorch; Yohann Loriot; Richard Meijer; M Carmen Mir; Marco Moschini; Hugh Mostafid; Arndt-Christian Müller; Christoph R Müller; James N'Dow; Andrea Necchi; Yann Neuzillet; Jorg R Oddens; Jan Oldenburg; Susanne Osanto; Wim J G Oyen; Luís Pacheco-Figueiredo; Helle Pappot; Manish I Patel; Bradley R Pieters; Karin Plass; Mesut Remzi; Margitta Retz; Jonathan Richenberg; Michael Rink; Florian Roghmann; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Morgan Rouprêt; Olivier Rouvière; Carl Salembier; Antti Salminen; Paul Sargos; Shomik Sengupta; Amir Sherif; Robert J Smeenk; Anita Smits; Arnulf Stenzl; George N Thalmann; Bertrand Tombal; Baris Turkbey; Susanne Vahr Lauridsen; Riccardo Valdagni; Antoine G Van Der Heijden; Hein Van Poppel; Mihai D Vartolomei; Erik Veskimäe; Antoni Vilaseca; Franklin A Vives Rivera; Thomas Wiegel; Peter Wiklund; Andrew Williams; Richard Zigeuner; Alan Horwich Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2019-11-19 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Sherif Mehralivand; Joanna H Shih; Stephanie Harmon; Clayton Smith; Jonathan Bloom; Marcin Czarniecki; Samuel Gold; Graham Hale; Kareem Rayn; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey Journal: Radiology Date: 2019-01-22 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Juha Knaapila; Ivan Jambor; Otto Ettala; Pekka Taimen; Janne Verho; Ileana Montoya Perez; Aida Kiviniemi; Tapio Pahikkala; Harri Merisaari; Tarja Lamminen; Jani Saunavaara; Hannu J Aronen; Kari T Syvänen; Peter J Boström Journal: Eur Urol Focus Date: 2020-05-14
Authors: Vasilis Stavrinides; Tom Syer; Yipeng Hu; Francesco Giganti; Alex Freeman; Solon Karapanagiotis; Simon R J Bott; Louise C Brown; Nicholas Burns-Cox; Timothy J Dudderidge; Ahmed El-Shater Bosaily; Elena Frangou; Maneesh Ghei; Alastair Henderson; Richard G Hindley; Richard S Kaplan; Robert Oldroyd; Chris Parker; Raj Persad; Derek J Rosario; Iqbal S Shergill; Lina M Carmona Echeverria; Joseph M Norris; Mathias Winkler; Dean Barratt; Alex Kirkham; Shonit Punwani; Hayley C Whitaker; Hashim U Ahmed; Mark Emberton Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2020-10-10 Impact factor: 20.096