Literature DB >> 31502937

Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric MRI versus 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI for Extracapsular Extension and Seminal Vesicle Invasion in Patients with Prostate Cancer.

Urs J Muehlematter1, Irene A Burger1, Anton S Becker1, Khoschy Schawkat1, Andreas M Hötker1, Cäcilia S Reiner1, Julian Müller1, Niels J Rupp1, Jan H Rüschoff1, Daniel Eberli1, Olivio F Donati1.   

Abstract

Background Recent studies have reported the additive value of combined gallium 68 (68Ga)-labeled Glu-urea-Lys (Ahx)-HBED-CC ligand targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) (hereafter called 68Ga-PSMA-11) PET/MRI for the detection and localization of primary prostate cancer compared with multiparametric MRI. Purpose To compare the diagnostic accuracy and interrater agreement of multiparametric MRI and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI for the detection of extracapsular extension (ECE) and seminal vesicle infiltration (SVI) in patients with prostate cancer. Materials and Methods Retrospective analysis of 40 consecutive men who underwent multiparametric MRI and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI within 6 months for suspected prostate cancer followed by radical prostatectomy between April 2016 and July 2018. Four readers blinded to clinical and histopathologic findings rated the probability of ECE and SVI at multiparametric MRI and PET/MRI by using a five-point Likert-type scale. The prostatectomy specimen served as the reference standard. Accuracy was assessed with a multireader multicase analysis and by calculating reader-average areas under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUCs), sensitivity, and specificity for ordinal and dichotomized data in a region-specific and patient-specific approach. Interrater agreement was assessed with the Fleiss multirater κ. Results For multiparametric MRI versus PET/MRI in ECE detection, respectively, AUC, sensitivity, and specificity in the region-specific analysis were 0.67 and 0.75 (P = .07), 28% (21 of 76) and 47% (36 of 76) (P = .09), and 94% (529 of 564) and 90% (509 of 564) (P = .007). For the patient-specific analysis, AUC, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.66 and 0.73 (P = .19), 46% (22 of 48) and 69% (33 of 48) (P = .04), and 75% (84 of 112) and 67% (75 of 112) (P = .19), respectively. For multiparametric MRI versus PET/MRI in SVI detection, respectively, AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of the region-specific analysis were 0.66 and 0.74 (P = .21), 35% (seven of 20) and 50% (10 of 20) (P = .25), and 98% (295 of 300) and 94% (282 of 300) (P < .001). For the patient-specific analysis, AUC, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.65 and 0.79 (P = .25), 35% (seven of 20) and 55% (11 of 20) (P = .20), and 98% (137 of 140) and 94% (131 of 140) (P = .07), respectively. Interrater reliability for multiparametric MRI versus PET/MRI did not differ for ECE (κ, 0.46 vs 0.40; P = .24) and SVI (κ, 0.23 vs 0.33; P = .39). Conclusion Our results suggest that gallium 68 (68Ga)-labeled Glu-urea-Lys (Ahx)-HBED-CC ligand targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) (68Ga-PSMA-11) PET/MRI and multiparametric MRI perform similarly for local staging of prostate cancer in patients with intermediate-to-high-risk prostate cancer. The increased sensitivity of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI for the detection of extracapsular disease comes at the cost of a slightly reduced specificity. © RSNA, 2019.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31502937     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019190687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  25 in total

1.  [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in prostate cancer: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Frédéric Bois; Camille Noirot; Sébastien Dietemann; Ismini C Mainta; Thomas Zilli; Valentina Garibotto; Martin A Walter
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-12-15

Review 2.  [Hybrid imaging in prostate cancer : Status quo and future applications].

Authors:  Michal-Kamil Chodyla; Matthias Eiber; Axel Wetter; Isabel Rauscher
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  18F-Fluciclovine versus PSMA PET Imaging in Primary Tumor Detection during Initial Staging of High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Divya Yadav; Hyunsoo Hwang; Wei Qiao; Rituraj Upadhyay; Brian F Chapin; Chad Tang; Ana Aparicio; Maria A Lopez-Olivo; Stella K Kang; Homer A Macapinlac; Tharakeswara K Bathala; Devaki Shilpa Surasi
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2022-03

Review 4.  Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) fusion imaging in prostate cancer: PET-CT vs PET-MRI.

Authors:  Feng-Yuan Liu; Ting-Wen Sheng; Jing-Ren Tseng; Kai-Jie Yu; Ke-Hong Tsui; Se-Tong Pang; Li-Jen Wang; Gigin Lin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI versus multiparametric MRI in men referred for prostate biopsy: primary tumour localization and interreader agreement.

Authors:  Daniela A Ferraro; Andreas M Hötker; Olivio F Donati; Irene A Burger; Anton S Becker; Iliana Mebert; Riccardo Laudicella; Anka Baltensperger; Niels J Rupp; Jan H Rueschoff; Julian Müller; Ashkan Mortezavi; Marcelo T Sapienza; Daniel Eberli
Journal:  Eur J Hybrid Imaging       Date:  2022-07-18

6.  Head-to-Head Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI with a Histopathology Gold Standard in the Detection, Intraprostatic Localization, and Determination of Local Extension of Primary Prostate Cancer: Results from a Prospective Single-Center Imaging Trial.

Authors:  Ida Sonni; Ely R Felker; Andrew T Lenis; Anthony E Sisk; Shadfar Bahri; Martin Allen-Auerbach; Wesley R Armstrong; Voraparee Suvannarerg; Teeravut Tubtawee; Tristan Grogan; David Elashoff; Matthias Eiber; Steven S Raman; Johannes Czernin; Robert E Reiter; Jeremie Calais
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 11.082

7.  Time point-independent tumor positivity of 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT pre- and post-biopsy in high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sijuan Zou; Shuang Song; Jianyuan Zhou; Bo Yu; Dong Kuang; Zhihua Wang; Xiaohua Zhu
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.258

8.  Local staging of prostate cancer with imaging: can hybrid imaging be the solution?

Authors:  Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-04

9.  Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) for local staging of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sungmin Woo; Soleen Ghafoor; Anton S Becker; Sangwon Han; Andreas G Wibmer; Hedvig Hricak; Irene A Burger; Heiko Schöder; Hebert Alberto Vargas
Journal:  Eur J Hybrid Imaging       Date:  2020-09-09

10.  Improving workflow in prostate MRI: AI-based decision-making on biparametric or multiparametric MRI.

Authors:  Andreas M Hötker; Raffaele Da Mutten; Anja Tiessen; Ender Konukoglu; Olivio F Donati
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-08-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.