| Literature DB >> 34368531 |
Shahid Hussain1, Shahzad Ali Shahid Chatha1, Abdullah Ijaz Hussain1, Riaz Hussain2, Muhammad Yasir Mehboob2, Asim Mansha3, Nabeel Shahzad3, Khurshid Ayub4.
Abstract
Gas sensors are widely explored due to their remarkable detecclass="Chemical">tion efficiency for class="Chemical">pollutants.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34368531 PMCID: PMC8340102 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c01473
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1Optimized geometry of Mg12O12 at the B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level of theory.
Figure 2Optimized geometries of Zn-decorated Mg12O12 (Y1 and Y2) at the B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level of DFT.
Figure 3Optimized geometries of COCl2-Mg12O12 (X1 and X2) and COCl2-Zn-Mg12O12 (Z1 and Z2) at the B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level of DFT.
Bond Distances, QNBO, and Adsorption Energies of All Studied Systems at the B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) Level of DFT
| system | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mg12O12 | |||||
| COCl2-Mg12O12 ( | 2.85 | 0.053 | –44.92 | ||
| COCl2-Mg12O12 ( | 2.99 | 0.075 | –71.32 | ||
| Zn-Mg12O12 ( | 2.05 | 0.553 | –388.91 | ||
| COCl2-Zn-Mg12O12 ( | 2.19 | 3.63 | 1.031 | –455.22 | |
| Zn-Mg12O12 ( | 2.02 | 0.322 | –403.11 | ||
| COCl2-Zn-Mg12O12 ( | 2.09 | 3.87 | 1.001 | –419.04 |
Distance of metal from the Mg12O12 cluster in Å.
Distance of NO2 from a metal in Å.
Adsorption energy in kJ/mol.
Adsorption Energy Values (kJ/mol) of Some Previously Reported Systems
| systems | reference | |
|---|---|---|
| COCl2-Cu-B12N12 | –16.954 | Hussain et al. (2020)[ |
| COCl2-Cu-B12P12 | –119.031 | Younas et al. (2021)[ |
| COCl2-Al12P12 and COCl2-Al12N12 | –26.244 and −78.732 | Padash et al. (2019)[ |
| COCl2-B12P12 and COCl2-B12N12 | –26.242 and −26.243 | Padash et al. (2019)[ |
| COCl2-Cr-graphene | –93.951 | Mella and Cortés-Arriagada
(2019)[ |
| COCl2-boron nitride nanocones | –69.452 | Vesally et al. (2018)[ |
| COCl2-aluminum nitride nanotubes | –24.520 | Shahabi
and Raissi (2016)[ |
| COCl2-boron nitride nanoflasks | –12.670 | Moladoust et al. (2019)[ |
Figure 4Dipole moment of all studied systems at the B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level of DFT.
Energies of HOMO and LUMO and Fermi Level along with the Band Gap of All Studied Systems at the B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) Basis Set of DFT
| systems | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mg12O12 | –6.56 | –1.69 | –4.13 | 4.87 |
| COCl2-Mg12O12 ( | –6.43 | –2.22 | –2.11 | 4.21 |
| COCl2-Mg12O12 ( | –6.27 | –2.79 | –1.74 | 3.47 |
| Zn-Mg12O12 ( | –4.95 | –1.78 | –1.58 | 3.17 |
| COCl2-Zn-Mg12O12 ( | –4.89 | –1.91 | –1.49 | 2.98 |
| Zn-Mg12O12 ( | –5.37 | –1.68 | –1.85 | 3.69 |
| COCl2-Zn-Mg12O12 ( | –5.33 | –1.76 | –1.78 | 3.56 |
Figure 5Distribution pattern of HOMO and LUMO in all studied systems.
Figure 6Partial density of states plots of all studied systems at the B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level of DFT.
IP (Ionization Potential in eV), EA (Electron Affinity in eV), X (Electronegativity), μ (Chemical Potential in eV), η (Global Hardness in eV), S (Global Softness in eV–1), and ω (Global Electrophilic Index in eV) of Studied Systems
| systems | IP | EA | μ | η | ω | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mg12O12 | 6.560 | 1.690 | 4.125 | –4.125 | 2.435 | 0.205 | 3.494 |
| COCl2-Mg12O12 ( | 6.430 | 2.220 | 4.325 | –4.325 | 2.105 | 0.238 | 4.443 |
| COCl2-Mg12O12 ( | 6.270 | 2.790 | 4.530 | –4.530 | 1.740 | 0.287 | 5.897 |
| Zn-Mg12O12 ( | 4.950 | 1.780 | 3.365 | –3.365 | 1.585 | 0.315 | 3.572 |
| COCl2-Zn-Mg12O12 ( | 4.890 | 1.910 | 3.400 | –3.400 | 1.490 | 0.336 | 3.879 |
| Zn-Mg12O12 ( | 5.370 | 1.680 | 3.525 | –3.525 | 1.845 | 0.271 | 3.367 |
| COCl2-Zn-Mg12O12 ( | 5.330 | 1.760 | 3.545 | –3.545 | 1.785 | 0.280 | 3.520 |