| Literature DB >> 32637830 |
Shahid Hussain1, Shahzad Ali Shahid Chatha1, Abdullah Ijaz Hussain1, Riaz Hussain2, Muhammad Yasir Mehboob2, Tahsin Gulzar1, Asim Mansha1, Nabeel Shahzad1, Khurshid Ayub3.
Abstract
class="Gene">Gas sensing materiEntities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32637830 PMCID: PMC7331065 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c01686
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1B12P12 DFT-based relaxed structure with the aid of the B3LYP method along with the 6-31G(d,p) level of DFT.
Figure 2Optimized geometries of CO2–B12P12 and D1–D4 systems.
Figure 3Optimized geometries of CO2-adsorbed Zn–B12P12 (E1–E4) systems.
Distance of Zn Metal from the B12P12 Nanocage (Å), Distance between the Closest Atom of CO2 and Zn Metal (Å), Natural Bonding Orbital Charge (QNBO) on Metal and Gas (eV), Dipole Moment (Debye), and Adsorption Energy of All Systems (kJ/mol)
| systems | μD (D) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B12P12 | 0.00 | |||||
| B12P12–CO2 | –0.624 | 0.33 | –4.88 | |||
| Zn–BP ( | 2.15 | 1.937 | 2.25 | –57.12 | ||
| Zn–BP–CO2 ( | 2.30 | –0.692 | 5.36 | –75.12 | ||
| Zn–BP ( | 2.15 | 0.524 | 3.24 | –22.94 | ||
| Zn–BP–CO2 ( | 4.25 | –0.677 | 3.07 | –25.89 | ||
| Zn–BP ( | 2.96 | 0.076 | 0.94 | –21.03 | ||
| Zn–BP–CO2 ( | 3.24 | –0.685 | 3.00 | –42.43 | ||
| Zn–BP ( | 3.00 | –0.422 | 0.61 | –14.07 | ||
| Zn–BP–CO2 ( | 4.25 | –0.681 | 3.30 | –28.73 |
Distance between the nearest CO2 atom from the Zn metal.
Adsorption energies of different systems.
Figure 4MEP of all systems (for understanding the colors in these figures, the reader must read the web version of this article). The isosurface value is 0.02e/Å3.
Energies of HOMO, LUMO, and Fermi Level (EFL) along with the HOMO–LUMO Energy Gap (Eg) in eV of All Systems
| system | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B12P12 | –6.83 | –4.98 | –3.13 | 3.70 |
| B12P12–CO2 | –6.81 | –4.96 | –3.11 | 3.69 |
| Zn–BP ( | –5.92 | –4.45 | –2.97 | 2.95 |
| Zn–BP–CO2 ( | –5.64 | –4.21 | –2.77 | 2.88 |
| Zn–BP ( | –6.25 | –4.71 | –3.16 | 3.09 |
| Zn–BP–CO2 ( | –6.27 | –4.73 | –3.19 | 3.08 |
| Zn–BP ( | –5.63 | –4.41 | –3.19 | 2.43 |
| Zn–BP–CO2 ( | –6.16 | –4.59 | –3.02 | 3.41 |
| Zn–BP ( | –5.57 | –4.37 | –3.17 | 2.40 |
| Zn–BP–CO2 ( | –5.61 | –4.40 | –3.19 | 2.42 |
Figure 5Side views of HOMO and LUMO of different systems. The isosurface value is 0.02e/Å3.
Figure 6DOS for all systems at the B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level of DFT.
IP, EA, X (Electronegativity), μ (Chemical Potential), η (Global Hardness), S (Global Softness), and ω (Global Electrophilicity) of All Systems
| system | IP (eV) | EA (eV) | μ (eV) | Ω (eV) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BP | 6.830 | 3.130 | 4.980 | –4.980 | 1.850 | 0.270 | 6.703 |
| BP–CO2 | 6.810 | 3.110 | 4.960 | –4.960 | 1.850 | 0.270 | 6.649 |
| Zn–BP ( | 5.920 | 2.970 | 4.445 | –4.445 | 1.475 | 0.339 | 6.698 |
| Zn–BP–CO2 ( | 5.640 | 2.770 | 4.205 | –4.205 | 1.435 | 0.348 | 6.161 |
| Zn–BP ( | 6.250 | 3.160 | 4.705 | –4.705 | 1.545 | 0.324 | 7.164 |
| Zn–BP–CO2 ( | 6.270 | 3.190 | 4.730 | –4.730 | 1.540 | 0.325 | 7.264 |
| Zn–BP ( | 5.630 | 3.190 | 4.410 | –4.410 | 1.220 | 0.410 | 7.971 |
| Zn–BP–CO2 ( | 6.160 | 3.020 | 4.590 | –4.590 | 1.570 | 0.318 | 6.710 |
| Zn–BP ( | 5.570 | 3.170 | 4.370 | –4.370 | 1.200 | 0.417 | 7.957 |
| Zn–BP–CO2 ( | 5.610 | 3.190 | 4.400 | –4.400 | 1.210 | 0.413 | 8.000 |