| Literature DB >> 32280908 |
Shahid Hussain1, Riaz Hussain2, Muhammad Yasir Mehboob2, Shahzad Ali Shahid Chatha1, Abdullah Ijaz Hussain1, Ali Umar2, Muhammad Usman Khan1,2, Mahmood Ahmed3, Muhammad Adnan4, Khurshid Ayub5.
Abstract
Nanostructured gas sensors find diverse applications in environmental and agricultural monitoring. Herein, adsorption of phosgene (COCl2) on pure and copper-decorated B12N12 (Cu-BN) is analyzed through density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Adsorption of copper on B12N12 results in two optimized geometries, named Cu@b66 and Cu@b64, with adsorption energies of -193.81 and -198.45 kJ/mol, respectively. The adsorption/interaction energies of COCl2 on pure BN nanocages are -9.30, -6.90, and -3.70 kJ/mol in G1, G2, and G3 geometries, respectively, whereas the interaction energies of COCl2 on copper-decorated BN are -1.66 and -16.95 kJ/mol for B1 and B2, respectively. To examine the changes in the properties of pure and Cu-BN nanocages, geometric parameters, dipole moment, Q NBO, frontier molecular orbitals, and partial density of states (PDOS) are analyzed to comprehensively illustrate the interaction mechanism. The results of these parameters reveal that COCl2 binds more strongly onto copper-doped BN nanocages. Moreover, a higher charge separation is observed in COCl2-Cu-BN geometries as compared to copper-decorated BN geometries. Therefore, these nanocages may be considered as potential candidates for application in phosgene sensors.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32280908 PMCID: PMC7144133 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c00507
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1Optimized structure of B12N12.
Figure 2Optimized structures of Cu-doped B12N12 nanocages.
Figure 3Different orientations of COCl2 on BN. In the G3 orientation, COCl2 is situated in the center of the ring, so the average distance is calculated.
Figure 4Optimized structures of COCl2-adsorbed Cu–B12N12.
Closest Distance of Cu to B12N12, COCl2 to Pure B12N12, and COCl2 to Cu–BN, QNBO on the Metal and Gas (COCl2), Dipole Moment, and Adsorption Energies of Different Systems
| systems | μD (Debye) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| BN | 0.00 | |||||
| BN–COCl2 ( | 2.62 | 0.05 | 2.09 | –9.43 | ||
| BN–COCl2 ( | 2.85 | 0.02 | 1.36 | –6.90 | ||
| BN–COCl2 ( | 3.26 | 0.004 | 1.54 | –3.70 | ||
| Cu–BN ( | 1.93 | 0.517 | 1.72 | –193.81 | ||
| Cu–BN–COCl2 ( | 1.93 | 4.17 | 0.015 | 0.513 | 1.30 | –1.66 |
| Cu–BN ( | 1.94 | 0.540 | 1.49 | –198.45 | ||
| Cu–BN–COCl2 ( | 1.94 | 2.55 | 0.062 | 0.591 | 3.72 | –16.95 |
Figure 5MEP of different systems (for understanding the color in these figures, the reader must read the web version of this article). The isosurface value is 0.02 e/Å3.
Orbital Parameters: HOMO and LUMO Energies, Fermi Level, HOMO–LUMO Energy Gap for Different Systems
| system | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu | –5.98 | –3.32 | –0.67 | 5.30 |
| BN | –7.71 | –4.29 | –0.87 | 6.84 |
| BN–COCl2 ( | –7.53 | –4.81 | –2.09 | 5.43 |
| BN–COCl2 ( | –7.62 | –4.82 | –2.02 | 5.59 |
| BN–COCl2 ( | –7.58 | –4.72 | –1.87 | 5.72 |
| Cu–BN ( | –4.85 | –3.29 | –1.72 | 3.13 |
| Cu–BN–COCl2 ( | –4.87 | –3.41 | –1.97 | 2.87 |
| Cu–BN ( | –4.89 | –3.36 | –1.83 | 3.05 |
| Cu–BN–COCl2 ( | –4.78 | –3.64 | –2.50 | 2.28 |
Figure 6Side views of the HOMO and LUMO of different systems. The isosurface value is 0.02 e/Å3.
Figure 7Different systems with their TDOS and PDOS graphs. The isosurface value is 0.02 e/Å3.
Ionization Potential (I), Electron Affinity (A), Chemical Hardness (η), Chemical Potential (μ), Softness (), and Electrophilicity (ω) of Different Systems
| systems | η (eV) | μ (eV) | ω (eV) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu | 5.98 | 0.67 | 2.66 | –3.33 | 0.19 | 2.08 |
| BN | 7.71 | 0.87 | 3.42 | –4.29 | 0.15 | 2.70 |
| BN–COCl2 ( | 7.53 | 2.09 | 2.72 | –4.81 | 0.18 | 4.25 |
| BN–COCl2 ( | 7.62 | 2.02 | 2.80 | –4.82 | 0.18 | 4.15 |
| BN–COCl2 ( | 7.58 | 1.87 | 2.86 | –4.73 | 0.18 | 3.91 |
| Cu–BN ( | 4.85 | 1.72 | 1.57 | –3.29 | 0.32 | 3.45 |
| Cu–BN–COCl2 ( | 4.84 | 1.97 | 1.44 | –3.41 | 0.35 | 4.04 |
| Cu–BN ( | 4.89 | 1.83 | 1.53 | –3.36 | 0.33 | 3.76 |
| Cu–BN–COCl2 ( | 4.78 | 2.50 | 1.14 | –3.64 | 0.44 | 5.81 |