| Literature DB >> 32280908 |
Shahid Hussain1, Riaz Hussain2, Muhammad Yasir Mehboob2, Shahzad Ali Shahid Chatha1, Abdullah Ijaz Hussain1, Ali Umar2, Muhammad Usman Khan1,2, Mahmood Ahmed3, Muhammad Adnan4, Khurshid Ayub5.
Abstract
NanostructuredEntities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32280908 PMCID: PMC7144133 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c00507
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1Optimized structure of B12N12.
Figure 2Optimized structures of Cu-doped B12N12 nanocages.
Figure 3Different orientations of COCl2 on BN. In the G3 orientation, COCl2 is situated in the center of the ring, so the average distance is calculated.
Figure 4Optimized structures of COCl2-adsorbed Cu–B12N12.
Closest Distance of Cu to B12N12, COCl2 to Pure B12N12, and COCl2 to Cu–BN, QNBO on the Metal and Gas (COCl2), Dipole Moment, and Adsorption Energies of Different Systems
| systems | μD (Debye) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| BN | 0.00 | |||||
| BN–COCl2 ( | 2.62 | 0.05 | 2.09 | –9.43 | ||
| BN–COCl2 ( | 2.85 | 0.02 | 1.36 | –6.90 | ||
| BN–COCl2 ( | 3.26 | 0.004 | 1.54 | –3.70 | ||
| Cu–BN ( | 1.93 | 0.517 | 1.72 | –193.81 | ||
| Cu–BN–COCl2 ( | 1.93 | 4.17 | 0.015 | 0.513 | 1.30 | –1.66 |
| Cu–BN ( | 1.94 | 0.540 | 1.49 | –198.45 | ||
| Cu–BN–COCl2 ( | 1.94 | 2.55 | 0.062 | 0.591 | 3.72 | –16.95 |
Figure 5MEP of different systems (for understanding the color in these figures, the reader must read the web version of this article). The isosurface value is 0.02 e/Å3.
Orbital Parameters: HOMO and LUMO Energies, Fermi Level, HOMO–LUMO Energy Gap for Different Systems
| system | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu | –5.98 | –3.32 | –0.67 | 5.30 |
| BN | –7.71 | –4.29 | –0.87 | 6.84 |
| BN–COCl2 ( | –7.53 | –4.81 | –2.09 | 5.43 |
| BN–COCl2 ( | –7.62 | –4.82 | –2.02 | 5.59 |
| BN–COCl2 ( | –7.58 | –4.72 | –1.87 | 5.72 |
| Cu–BN ( | –4.85 | –3.29 | –1.72 | 3.13 |
| Cu–BN–COCl2 ( | –4.87 | –3.41 | –1.97 | 2.87 |
| Cu–BN ( | –4.89 | –3.36 | –1.83 | 3.05 |
| Cu–BN–COCl2 ( | –4.78 | –3.64 | –2.50 | 2.28 |
Figure 6Side views of the HOMO and LUMO of different systems. The isosurface value is 0.02 e/Å3.
Figure 7Different systems with their TDOS and PDOS graphs. The isosurface value is 0.02 e/Å3.
Ionization Potential (I), Electron Affinity (A), Chemical Hardness (η), Chemical Potential (μ), Softness (), and Electrophilicity (ω) of Different Systems
| systems | η (eV) | μ (eV) | ω (eV) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu | 5.98 | 0.67 | 2.66 | –3.33 | 0.19 | 2.08 |
| BN | 7.71 | 0.87 | 3.42 | –4.29 | 0.15 | 2.70 |
| BN–COCl2 ( | 7.53 | 2.09 | 2.72 | –4.81 | 0.18 | 4.25 |
| BN–COCl2 ( | 7.62 | 2.02 | 2.80 | –4.82 | 0.18 | 4.15 |
| BN–COCl2 ( | 7.58 | 1.87 | 2.86 | –4.73 | 0.18 | 3.91 |
| Cu–BN ( | 4.85 | 1.72 | 1.57 | –3.29 | 0.32 | 3.45 |
| Cu–BN–COCl2 ( | 4.84 | 1.97 | 1.44 | –3.41 | 0.35 | 4.04 |
| Cu–BN ( | 4.89 | 1.83 | 1.53 | –3.36 | 0.33 | 3.76 |
| Cu–BN–COCl2 ( | 4.78 | 2.50 | 1.14 | –3.64 | 0.44 | 5.81 |