| Literature DB >> 34367532 |
Lingling Han1, Yue Chen1, Weidong Cheng1, He Bai1, Jian Wang1, Miaozhi Yu1.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to optimize the CT images of anal fistula patients using a convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm to investigate the anal function recovery.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34367532 PMCID: PMC8337139 DOI: 10.1155/2021/1730158
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1The specific process of CT examination.
Figure 2The processed pelvic CT image.
Wexner anal incontinence score sheet.
| Grade | Characteristics |
|---|---|
| Grade | The anus function is normal, and the solid, liquid, and gas are well controlled |
| Grade | The solid and liquid is well controlled but the gas is out of control |
| Grade | Good control of solids, but there is a little liquid, infiltrating clothing |
| Grade | Unable to control the liquid, it will often stain the clothes |
| Grade | Both solids and liquids are out of control |
Note. Grades A, B, and C indicate good anal function, while grades D and E indicate poor anal function.
The basic information of patients.
| Group | Gender | Age (year) | Disease course (month) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male ( | Female ( | |||
| Control group ( | 17 | 10 | 36.8 ± 4.1 | 8.3 ± 3.7 |
| Experimental group ( | 18 | 12 | 38.2 ± 5.0 | 7.6 ± 4.2 |
Comparison of examination results and postoperative results.
| Anal fistula situation | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental group and postoperative results | Control group and postoperative results | ||||
| Grouping ( | Experimental group | Postoperative results | Control group | Postoperative results | |
| 2/2 or more internal openings | 23 | 27 | 14 | 20 | |
| 2/2 or more external openings | 24 | 24 | 21 | 21 | |
|
| |||||
| Fistula trend | “ | 12 | 14 | 7 | 10 |
| “ | 11 | 15 | 5 | 8 | |
| Other irregular sinuses | 11 | 5 | 11 | 5 | |
|
| |||||
| Whether there are branches beside the fistula | 2 | 7 | 0 | 7 | |
|
| |||||
| Whether it is associated with perianal muscles | 14 | 17 | 12 | 19 | |
|
| |||||
| Diameter of fistula ≥ 2 mm | 24 | 29 | 13 | 21 | |
Figure 3Comparison of CT images of the two groups of patients. (a) Control group. (b) Experimental group.
Consistency between the examination results and the postoperative results (n%).
| Anal fistula situation | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grouping | Experimental group ( | Control group ( | |||
| 2/2 or more internal openings | 85.1 | 70.0 | |||
|
| |||||
| Fistula trend | “ | 85.7 | 79.5 | 70.0 | 66.3 |
| “ | 73.3 | 62.5 | |||
| Whether there are branches beside the fistula | 28.6 | 0 | |||
| Whether it is associated with perianal muscles | 82.4 | 61.2 | |||
| Diameter of fistula ≥ 3 mm | 82.8 | 62.0 | |||
Figure 4Comparison of the consistency with the results observed during the surgery. (a) 2/2 or more internal openings; (b) Fistula trend; (c) Whether there are branches beside the fistula; (d) Whether it is associated with perianal muscles; (e) Diameter of fistula ≥ 3 mm.
Postoperative anal function recovery and recurrence rate.
| Grouping | Wexner anal incontinence score | Anorectal manometry | Recurrence rate ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperative | Postoperative | ARP (mmHg) | AMCP (mmHg) | ||
| Experimental group | 0.10 ± 0.24 | 1.06 ± 1.34 | 43.43 ± 9.41 | 122.71 ± 12.56 | 20 |
| Control group | 0.14 ± 0.29 | 0.34 ± 0.61 | 47.98 ± 10.21 | 137.63 ± 16.99 | 54 |
Figure 5CT images and postoperative results. (a) CT image of the experimental group; (b) postoperative performance of the experimental group; (c) CT image of the control group; (d) postoperative performance of the control group.