Omonyêlé L Adjognon1, Marlena H Shin1, Melissa J A Steffen2,3,4, Jennifer Moye1,5,6, Samantha Solimeo2,3,4,7, Jennifer L Sullivan1,8. 1. Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. VA Office of Patient Care Services, Primary Care Analytics Team, Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa, USA. 3. VA Office of Rural Health, Veterans Rural Health Resource Center, Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa, USA. 4. Center for Access and Delivery Research & Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa, USA. 5. New England Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 6. Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 7. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA. 8. School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify factors affecting implementation of Geriatric Patient-Aligned Care Teams (GeriPACTs), a patient-centered medical home model for older adults with complex care needs including multiple chronic conditions (MCC), designed to provide them with comprehensive, managed, and coordinated primary care. DATA SOURCES: Qualitative data were collected from key informants at eight Veterans Health Administration Medical Centers geographically spread across the United States. STUDY DESIGN: Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), we collected prospective primary data through semi-structured interviews with GeriPACT team members (e.g., physicians, nurses, social workers, pharmacists), leaders (e.g., executive leaders, middle managers), and other staff referring to the program. DATA COLLECTION: We conducted in-person, semi-structured interviews with 134 key informants. Interviews were recorded with permission and professionally transcribed. Transcripts were coded in Nvivo 11. We used directed content analysis to identify key factors affecting GeriPACT implementation across sites. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Five key factors affected GeriPACT implementation-five CFIR constructs within two CFIR domains. Within the intervention characteristics domain, two constructs emerged, namely, (1) the structure of the GeriPACT model and (2) design, quality, and packaging. Within the inner setting domain, we identified three constructs, namely, (1) available resources (e.g., staffing and space, and infrastructure and information technology), (2) leadership support and engagement, and (3) networks and communications including teamwork, communication, and coordination. CONCLUSIONS: Older veterans with MCC have complex primary care needs requiring high levels of care management and coordination. Knowing what key factors affect GeriPACT implementation is critical. Study findings also contribute to the growing implementation science literature on applying CFIR to evaluate factors that affect program implementation, especially to aging research. Further studies on MCC-focused specialty primary care will help facilitate patient-centered care provision for older adults' complex health needs while also leveraging synergistic work across factors affecting implementation. Published 2021. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
OBJECTIVE: To identify factors affecting implementation of Geriatric Patient-Aligned Care Teams (GeriPACTs), a patient-centered medical home model for older adults with complex care needs including multiple chronic conditions (MCC), designed to provide them with comprehensive, managed, and coordinated primary care. DATA SOURCES: Qualitative data were collected from key informants at eight Veterans Health Administration Medical Centers geographically spread across the United States. STUDY DESIGN: Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), we collected prospective primary data through semi-structured interviews with GeriPACT team members (e.g., physicians, nurses, social workers, pharmacists), leaders (e.g., executive leaders, middle managers), and other staff referring to the program. DATA COLLECTION: We conducted in-person, semi-structured interviews with 134 key informants. Interviews were recorded with permission and professionally transcribed. Transcripts were coded in Nvivo 11. We used directed content analysis to identify key factors affecting GeriPACT implementation across sites. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Five key factors affected GeriPACT implementation-five CFIR constructs within two CFIR domains. Within the intervention characteristics domain, two constructs emerged, namely, (1) the structure of the GeriPACT model and (2) design, quality, and packaging. Within the inner setting domain, we identified three constructs, namely, (1) available resources (e.g., staffing and space, and infrastructure and information technology), (2) leadership support and engagement, and (3) networks and communications including teamwork, communication, and coordination. CONCLUSIONS: Older veterans with MCC have complex primary care needs requiring high levels of care management and coordination. Knowing what key factors affect GeriPACT implementation is critical. Study findings also contribute to the growing implementation science literature on applying CFIR to evaluate factors that affect program implementation, especially to aging research. Further studies on MCC-focused specialty primary care will help facilitate patient-centered care provision for older adults' complex health needs while also leveraging synergistic work across factors affecting implementation. Published 2021. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Authors: Laura J Damschroder; David C Aron; Rosalind E Keith; Susan R Kirsh; Jeffery A Alexander; Julie C Lowery Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2009-08-07 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Jennifer L Sullivan; Rina Eisenstein; Thomas Price; Samantha Solimeo; Kenneth Shay Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2018 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Jennifer L Sullivan; Omonyêlé L Adjognon; Ryann L Engle; Marlena H Shin; Melissa K Afable; Whitney Rudin; Bert White; Kenneth Shay; Carol VanDeusen Lukas Journal: Health Care Manage Rev Date: 2018 Jul/Sep
Authors: Omonyêlé L Adjognon; Marlena H Shin; Melissa J A Steffen; Jennifer Moye; Samantha Solimeo; Jennifer L Sullivan Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2021-08-27 Impact factor: 3.734
Authors: Suzanne M Dyer; Jenni Suen; Helena Williams; Maria C Inacio; Gillian Harvey; David Roder; Steve Wesselingh; Andrew Kellie; Maria Crotty; Gillian E Caughey Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 4.070
Authors: Omonyêlé L Adjognon; Marlena H Shin; Melissa J A Steffen; Jennifer Moye; Samantha Solimeo; Jennifer L Sullivan Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2021-08-27 Impact factor: 3.734