Literature DB >> 34362316

Born in Brussels screening tool: the development of a screening tool measuring antenatal psychosocial vulnerability.

Kelly Amuli1,2, Kim Decabooter3, Florence Talrich4,3, Anne Renders3, Katrien Beeckman4,3,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antenatal psychosocial vulnerability is a main concern in today's perinatal health care setting. Undetected psychosocially vulnerable pregnant women and their unborn child are at risk for unfavourable health outcomes such as poor birth outcomes or mental state. In order to detect potential risks and prevent worse outcomes, timely and accurate detection of antenatal psychosocial vulnerability is necessary. Therefore, this paper aims to develop a screening tool 'the Born in Brussels Screening Tool (ST)' aimed at detecting antenatal psychosocial vulnerability.
METHODS: The Born in Brussels ST was developed based on a literature search of existing screening tools measuring antenatal psychosocial vulnerability. Indicators and items (i.e. questions) were evaluated and selected. The assigned points for the answer options were determined based on a survey sent out to caregivers experienced in antenatal (psychosocial) vulnerability. Further refinement of the tool's content and the assigned points was based on expert panels' advice.
RESULTS: The Born in Brussels ST consists of 22 items that focus on 13 indicators: communication, place of birth, residence status, education, occupational status, partner's occupation, financial situation, housing situation, social support, depression, anxiety, substance use and domestic violence. Based on the 168 caregivers who participated in the survey, assigned points account between 0,5 and 4. Threshold scores of each indicator were associated with adapted care paths.
CONCLUSION: Generalied and accurate detection of antenatal psychosocial vulnerability is needed. The brief and practical oriented Born in Brussels ST is a first step that can lead to an adequate and adapted care pathway for vulnerable pregnant women.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antenatal; Pregnancy; Psychosocial; Questionnaire; Screening; Vulnerability

Year:  2021        PMID: 34362316     DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11463-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Public Health        ISSN: 1471-2458            Impact factor:   3.295


  9 in total

Review 1.  Response burden and questionnaire length: is shorter better? A review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sindre Rolstad; John Adler; Anna Rydén
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 5.725

2.  Late start of antenatal care among ethnic minorities in a large cohort of pregnant women.

Authors:  M E Alderliesten; T G M Vrijkotte; M F van der Wal; G J Bonsel
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 6.531

3.  The antenatal risk questionnaire (ANRQ): acceptability and use for psychosocial risk assessment in the maternity setting.

Authors:  Marie-Paule Austin; Jana Colton; Susan Priest; Nicole Reilly; Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic
Journal:  Women Birth       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.172

4.  Universal psychosocial screening and adverse pregnancy outcomes in an academic obstetric clinic.

Authors:  Ann L Coker; Lisandra S Garcia; Corrine M Williams; Tim N Crawford; Emily R Clear; Judith McFarlane; James E Ferguson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Medical and Psychosocial Risk Profiles for Low Birthweight and Preterm Birth.

Authors:  Sara H Shaw; Janette E Herbers; J J Cutuli
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2019-07-26

6.  Barriers to antenatal psychosocial assessment and depression screening in private hospital settings.

Authors:  Tanya Connell; Bryanne Barnett; Donna Waters
Journal:  Women Birth       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 7.  Physical and mental health outcomes of prenatal maternal stress in human and animal studies: a review of recent evidence.

Authors:  Hind Beydoun; Audrey F Saftlas
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.980

8.  Systematic prenatal screening for psychosocial risks.

Authors:  Patricia A Harrison; Abbey C Sidebottom
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2008-02

Review 9.  Identifying the women at risk of antenatal anxiety and depression: A systematic review.

Authors:  Alessandra Biaggi; Susan Conroy; Susan Pawlby; Carmine M Pariante
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 4.839

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.