Literature DB >> 21764399

The antenatal risk questionnaire (ANRQ): acceptability and use for psychosocial risk assessment in the maternity setting.

Marie-Paule Austin1, Jana Colton, Susan Priest, Nicole Reilly, Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the value of the antenatal risk questionnaire (ANRQ) as a predictor of postnatal depression, to evaluate its acceptability to pregnant women and midwives, and to consider its use as part of a model for integrated psychosocial risk assessment in the antenatal setting.
METHOD: This paper further analysed published data from the pregnancy risk questionnaire in a sample of 1196 women. We extracted 12 items from the original 23 item pregnancy risk questionnaire to assess how the shorter ANRQ would perform, and undertook the analysis in the subset who were administered the composite international diagnostic interview (CIDI) at 2 or 4 months postpartum to assess for major depression (N=276). We also sampled a subset of pregnant participants (N=378) and midwives (N=44) to assess the tool's acceptability to these groups respectively.
FINDINGS: ROC curve analysis for the ANRQ yielded an acceptable area under the curve of 0.69. The most 'clinically' useful cut off on the ANRQ was a score of 23 or more, yielding a sensitivity of 0.62 and specificity of 0.64 with positive predictive value of 0.3. The odds that a woman scoring 23 or more on the ANRQ is also a case was 6.3 times greater than for a woman scoring less than 23. Acceptability of the ANRQ was high among both women and midwives.
CONCLUSION: The ANRQ is a highly acceptable self-report psychosocial assessment tool which aids in the prediction of women who go on to develop postnatal depression. In combination with a symptom based screening measure (e.g., the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale) and routine questions relating to drug and alcohol use and domestic violence, the ANRQ becomes most useful as a key element of a "screening intervention" aimed at the early identification of mental health risk and morbidity across the perinatal period. Evaluation of this model in terms of clinical outcomes remains to be undertaken.
Copyright © 2011 Australian College of Midwives. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21764399     DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2011.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Women Birth        ISSN: 1871-5192            Impact factor:   3.172


  33 in total

1.  Implementing the USPSTF Recommendations on Prevention of Perinatal Depression-Opportunities and Challenges.

Authors:  Jennifer N Felder
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Use of the Antenatal Risk Questionnaire to Assess Psychosocial Risk Factors Associated with Risk for Postpartum Depression: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Sharon L Ruyak; Fares Qeadan
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 2.388

3.  Correlates of Abuse Around the Time of Pregnancy: Results from a National Survey of Canadian Women.

Authors:  Dawn Kingston; Maureen Heaman; Marcelo Urquia; Patricia O'Campo; Patricia Janssen; Kellie Thiessen; Janet Smylie
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-04

Review 4.  Parenting after a history of childhood maltreatment: A scoping review and map of evidence in the perinatal period.

Authors:  Catherine Chamberlain; Graham Gee; Stephen Harfield; Sandra Campbell; Sue Brennan; Yvonne Clark; Fiona Mensah; Kerry Arabena; Helen Herrman; Stephanie Brown
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Towards Preventative Psychiatry: Concurrent and Longitudinal Predictors of Postnatal Maternal-Infant Bonding.

Authors:  Frances L Doyle; Sophie J Dickson; Valsamma Eapen; Paul J Frick; Eva R Kimonis; David J Hawes; Caroline Moul; Jenny L Richmond; Divya Mehta; Mark R Dadds
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2022-05-26

6.  Antenatal depression and adversity in urban South Africa.

Authors:  Thandi van Heyningen; Landon Myer; Michael Onah; Mark Tomlinson; Sally Field; Simone Honikman
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.839

7.  Factors affecting the maternal-foetal relationship.

Authors:  Gerda Čėsnaitė; Gintautas Domža; Diana Ramašauskaitė; Jelena Volochovič; Diana Bužinskienė
Journal:  Acta Med Litu       Date:  2019

8.  Obstetric care providers assessing psychosocial risk factors during pregnancy: validation of a short screening tool - the KINDEX Spanish Version.

Authors:  Andria Spyridou; Maggie Schauer; Martina Ruf-Leuschner
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.033

Review 9.  Psychobiobehavioral Model for Preterm Birth in Pregnant Women in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Authors:  Shahirose S Premji; Ilona S Yim; Aliyah Dosani Mawji; Zeenatkhanu Kanji; Salima Sulaiman; Joseph W Musana; Pauline Samia; Kiran Shaikh; Nicole Letourneau
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Screening for anxiety disorders in third trimester pregnancy: a comparison of four brief measures.

Authors:  Marie-Paule V Austin; Victoria Mule; Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic; Nicole Reilly
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 3.633

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.