Literature DB >> 22617583

Universal psychosocial screening and adverse pregnancy outcomes in an academic obstetric clinic.

Ann L Coker1, Lisandra S Garcia, Corrine M Williams, Tim N Crawford, Emily R Clear, Judith McFarlane, James E Ferguson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that women screened for psychosocial factors, including partner abuse, as recommended by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists would have higher neonatal birth weight, longer gestational age at delivery, higher Apgar scores, and fewer maternal complications.
METHODS: We evaluated a universal psychosocial screening intervention using a retrospective cohort (n=881 prenatal care patients). Pregnancy outcomes among patients screened beginning in 2008 (n=464) were compared with outcomes among women receiving care before universal screening was implemented (n=417). Data were obtained from medical records between 2007 and 2009. Multivariable logistic regression and analysis of covariance were used to estimate the association between screening and pregnancy outcomes among singleton births adjusting for confounders (prior preterm births, insurance, and mode of delivery).
RESULTS: Screened women were less likely than women not universally screened to have low birth weight neonates (4.5% of screened, 10.3% of unscreened; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23-0.73), preterm births (9.9% of screened, 14.9% of unscreened; adjusted OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41-0.96), and any maternal complication (30.0% of screened, 41.2% of unscreened; adjusted OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50-0.88). Newborn Apgar scores were higher (P=.01) among screened relative to unscreened mothers.
CONCLUSION: Our results provide evidence that universal screening was associated with improved pregnancy outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22617583     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318253d76c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  5 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for preventing or reducing domestic violence against pregnant women.

Authors:  Shayesteh Jahanfar; Louise M Howard; Nancy Medley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-11-12

2.  Correlates of Abuse Around the Time of Pregnancy: Results from a National Survey of Canadian Women.

Authors:  Dawn Kingston; Maureen Heaman; Marcelo Urquia; Patricia O'Campo; Patricia Janssen; Kellie Thiessen; Janet Smylie
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-04

3.  Magnitude of birth asphyxia and its associated factors among live birth in north Central Ethiopia 2021: an institutional-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Nigusie Selomon Tibebu; Tigabu Desie Emiru; Chalie Marew Tiruneh; Bisrat Dessie Getu; Moges Wubneh Abate; Adane Birhanu Nigat; Berihun Bantie; Getasew Legas; Belete Gelaw Walle; Mulualem Gete Feleke; Endalk Birrie
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.567

Review 4.  Immunological Role of the Maternal Uterine Microbiome in Pregnancy: Pregnancies Pathologies and Alterated Microbiota.

Authors:  Jonah Bardos; Desiree Fiorentino; Ryan E Longman; Michael Paidas
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 7.561

5.  Born in Brussels screening tool: the development of a screening tool measuring antenatal psychosocial vulnerability.

Authors:  Kelly Amuli; Kim Decabooter; Florence Talrich; Anne Renders; Katrien Beeckman
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.