| Literature DB >> 34356055 |
Anke Bögeholz1, Clemens Falker-Gieske1, Monika Guélat2, Corinne Gurtner3, Sibylle Hunziker4, Anna Oevermann5, Georg Thaller6, Cord Drögemüller4, Jens Tetens1,7.
Abstract
Bilateral convergent strabismus with exophthalmos (BCSE) is a malformation of the eyes and is recognized as a mild but progressive disorder that affects cattle in the first two years of life. This most likely inherited disorder is rarely described in cattle resembling autosomal dominantly inherited forms of human progressive external ophthalmoplegia (PEO). In German Braunvieh cattle, two linked genome regions were found that could be responsible for the development and/or progression of BCSE. The goal of this study was to phenotypically characterize BCSE in Holstein cattle from Germany and Switzerland as well as to identify associated genome regions by GWAS. The clinicopathological phenotype of 52 BCSE-affected Holstein cattle was in accordance with the phenotype described in German Braunvieh cattle, but in addition, signs of degeneration and cellular infiltration in the eye muscles were found. By using imputed sequence level genotype data, three genome-wide significant GWAS hits were revealed on different chromosomes that were not detected by initial GWAS based on high density SNP array data highlighting the usefulness of this approach for mapping studies. The associated genome regions include the ABCC4 gene as well as markers adjacent to the NCOR2 and DNAJC3 genes all illustrating possible functional candidate genes. Our results challenge a monogenic mode of inheritance and indicate a more complex inheritance of BCSE in Holstein cattle. Furthermore, in comparison to previous results from German Braunvieh cattle, it illustrates an obvious genetic heterogeneity causing BSCE in cattle. Subsequent whole genome sequencing (WGS)-based analyses might elucidate pathogenic variants in the future.Entities:
Keywords: GWAS; bos taurus; development; eye disorder; histopathology; imputation; monogenic inheritance; rare disease
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34356055 PMCID: PMC8303712 DOI: 10.3390/genes12071039
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
Figure 1Examples of BCSE-affected Holstein cattle. (A) Nine-month old female Holstein heifer with moderate BCSE; (B). Eight-month old female Red Holstein heifer with moderate BCSE; (C,D) Two-and-a-half year old Red Holstein cow in first lactation with severe BCSE. The first two cases were subjected to histopathological and neuropathological examination.
Figure 2Histopathological features of BCSE-affected Holstein cattle. Longitudinal (A) and cross (B) sections of muscle fibers of the M. retractor bulb. The cross section (B) shows mild variation in size and cellular infiltrates. Longitudinal (C) and cross (D) sections of muscle fibers of the M. rectus lateralis show a moderate degeneration and atrophy with size variation of fibers. Severe degeneration with internalization of satellite cells and prominent variation in fiber size are seen in the longitudinal (E) and cross (F) sections of muscle fibers of the M. rectus dorsalis. 200× magnification, HE stain.
Figure 3Results of the GWAS for BCSE in Holstein cattle based on imputed sequence level genotypes. (A) Genome-wide Manhattan plot of the GWAS results depicting the negative decadic logarithms of the p-values with respect to genomic position (UMD3.1). The horizontal dashed line represents the genome-wide significance threshold according to Bonferroni correction (pBonf < 0.05). Zoom into the three genome-wide significantly associated genome regions on chromosomes (Chr) 2 (B), 12 (C) and 17 (D). Gene content of the three BCSE-associated genome regions on Chr 2 (E), 12 (F) and 17 (G) according to Ensembl release 94 (UMD3.1, https://oct2018.archive.ensembl.org/Bos_taurus/Info/Index, accessed on 1 October 2020). Where no cattle gene symbols were available, human orthologue information was used or otherwise only the Ensembl ID is given. Note that genes marked with an asterisk and a subsequent letter do represent multiple genes annotated in the cattle genome with the same human orthologue. For further details, see Supplementary Material 2.
Top 20 of the genome-wide significantly associated variants (PBonf ≤ 0.05). Bold lines indicate associations with PBonf ≤ 0.01.
| Chr | rsID | Position [bp] 1 | Alleles 2 | MAF 3 | Odds Ratio | VEP 5 | Gene | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | rs136316260 | 100,672,388 | G/T | 0.17 | 38.75 | 1.49E-09 | intergenic | |
| 2 | rs134704382 | 100,674,312 | G/A | 0.17 | 38.75 | 1.49E-09 | intergenic | |
| 2 | rs135186290 | 100,675,331 | A/G | 0.17 | 38.75 | 1.49E-09 | intergenic | |
| 2 | rs134623922 | 100,675,365 | G/A | 0.17 | 38.75 | 1.49E-09 | intergenic | |
| 2 | rs385880764 | 100,675,837 | -/ATC | 0.17 | 38.75 | 1.49E-09 | intergenic | |
| 2 | rs133964128 | 100,676,979 | A/G | 0.17 | 38.75 | 1.49E-09 | intergenic | |
| 12 | rs377992474 | 74,888,457 | T/A | 0.34 | 9.90 | 8.36E-10 | intron |
|
| 12 | rs468443940 | 74,891,825 | T/G | 0.36 | 8.76 | 1.28E-09 | intron |
|
| 12 | rs381451112 | 74,892,681 | C/G | 0.34 | 10.78 | 1.41E-09 | intron |
|
| 12 | rs383448105 | 74,892,723 | A/G | 0.34 | 10.04 | 6.27E-10 | intron |
|
| 12 | rs378170580 | 74,892,729 | T/G | 0.34 | 10.84 | 1.00E-09 | intron |
|
| 12 | rs384157620 | 74,892,843 | A/G | 0.34 | 9.68 | 1.09E-09 | intron |
|
| 12 | rs110869430 | 74,893,319 | T/G | 0.33 | 9.70 | 7.05E-10 | intron |
|
| 12 | rs109771712 | 74,893,351 | C/G | 0.32 | 9.64 | 9.94E-10 | intron |
|
| 12 | rs876085957 | 74,893,362 | C/T | 0.34 | 9.86 | 1.09E-09 | intron |
|
| 12 | rs110191959 | 74,894,971 | A/G | 0.31 | 12.26 | 1.46E-09 | intron |
|
| 12 | rs384153179 | 74,895,060 | T/C | 0.32 | 11.94 | 1.55E-09 | intron |
|
| 17 | rs451202354 | 51,135,057 | C/T | 0.17 | 153.30 | 6.29E-10 | intergenic | |
| 17 | rs384954012 | 51,259,815 | A/- | 0.17 | 90.24 | 2.17E-10 | intergenic | |
| 17 | rs377905476 | 51,356,292 | G/T | 0.18 | 45.64 | 1.53E-09 | splice region |
|
1 Genome assembly UMD3.1; 2 minor allele given first; 3 minor allele frequency; 4 raw p-value; 5 variant effect prediction (VEP). For further details, see Supplementary Materials 1 and 2.