Literature DB >> 34350408

A Deep Learning-based Model for Detecting Abnormalities on Brain MR Images for Triaging: Preliminary Results from a Multisite Experience.

Romane Gauriau1, Bernardo C Bizzo1, Felipe C Kitamura1, Osvaldo Landi Junior1, Suely F Ferraciolli1, Fabiola B C Macruz1, Tiago A Sanchez1, Marcio R T Garcia1, Leonardo M Vedolin1, Romeu C Domingues1, Emerson L Gasparetto1, Katherine P Andriole1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a deep learning model for detecting brain abnormalities on MR images.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, a deep learning approach using T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images was developed to classify brain MRI findings as "likely normal" or "likely abnormal." A convolutional neural network model was trained on a large, heterogeneous dataset collected from two different continents and covering a broad panel of pathologic conditions, including neoplasms, hemorrhages, infarcts, and others. Three datasets were used. Dataset A consisted of 2839 patients, dataset B consisted of 6442 patients, and dataset C consisted of 1489 patients and was only used for testing. Datasets A and B were split into training, validation, and test sets. A total of three models were trained: model A (using only dataset A), model B (using only dataset B), and model A + B (using training datasets from A and B). All three models were tested on subsets from dataset A, dataset B, and dataset C separately. The evaluation was performed by using annotations based on the images, as well as labels based on the radiology reports.
RESULTS: Model A trained on dataset A from one institution and tested on dataset C from another institution reached an F1 score of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.74) and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.75, 0.80) when compared with findings from the radiology reports.
CONCLUSION: The model shows relatively good performance for differentiating between likely normal and likely abnormal brain examination findings by using data from different institutions.Keywords: MR-Imaging, Head/Neck, Computer Applications-General (Informatics), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Deep Learning Algorithms, Machine Learning Algorithms© RSNA, 2021Supplemental material is available for this article. 2021 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer Applications-General (Informatics); Convolutional Neural Network (CNN); Deep Learning Algorithms; Head/Neck; MR-Imaging; Machine Learning Algorithms

Year:  2021        PMID: 34350408      PMCID: PMC8328110          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2021200184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  9 in total

1.  Flying blind: using a digital dashboard to navigate a complex PACS environment.

Authors:  Matthew B Morgan; Barton F Branstetter; Jonathan Mates; Paul J Chang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Harmonization of multi-site diffusion tensor imaging data.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Fortin; Drew Parker; Birkan Tunç; Takanori Watanabe; Mark A Elliott; Kosha Ruparel; David R Roalf; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur; Robert T Schultz; Ragini Verma; Russell T Shinohara
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Using DICOM Metadata for Radiological Image Series Categorization: a Feasibility Study on Large Clinical Brain MRI Datasets.

Authors:  Romane Gauriau; Christopher Bridge; Lina Chen; Felipe Kitamura; Neil A Tenenholtz; John E Kirsch; Katherine P Andriole; Mark H Michalski; Bernardo C Bizzo
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  MRI scanner variability studies using a semi-automated analysis system.

Authors:  R J Hyde; J H Ellis; E A Gardner; Y Zhang; P L Carson
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Addressing the coming radiology crisis-the Society for Computer Applications in Radiology transforming the radiological interpretation process (TRIP) initiative.

Authors:  Katherine P Andriole; Richard L Morin; Ronald L Arenson; John A Carrino; Bradley J Erickson; Steven C Horii; David W Piraino; Bruce I Reiner; J Anthony Seibert; Eliot Siegel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-11-25       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Domain adaptation for Alzheimer's disease diagnostics.

Authors:  Christian Wachinger; Martin Reuter
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Statistical Challenges in "Big Data" Human Neuroimaging.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Smart chest X-ray worklist prioritization using artificial intelligence: a clinical workflow simulation.

Authors:  Ivo Baltruschat; Leonhard Steinmeister; Hannes Nickisch; Axel Saalbach; Michael Grass; Gerhard Adam; Tobias Knopp; Harald Ittrich
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Multimodal and Multiscale Deep Neural Networks for the Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease using structural MR and FDG-PET images.

Authors:  Donghuan Lu; Karteek Popuri; Gavin Weiguang Ding; Rakesh Balachandar; Mirza Faisal Beg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Prediction of Chronological Age in Healthy Elderly Subjects with Machine Learning from MRI Brain Segmentation and Cortical Parcellation.

Authors:  Jaime Gómez-Ramírez; Miguel A Fernández-Blázquez; Javier J González-Rosa
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-04-29

Review 2.  Deep Learning in Large and Multi-Site Structural Brain MR Imaging Datasets.

Authors:  Mariana Bento; Irene Fantini; Justin Park; Leticia Rittner; Richard Frayne
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.081

3.  Deep Learning Model for Intracranial Hemangiopericytoma and Meningioma Classification.

Authors:  Ziyan Chen; Ningrong Ye; Nian Jiang; Qi Yang; Siyi Wanggou; Xuejun Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  The efficacy of deep learning models in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer using MRI: a comparison with radiologists.

Authors:  Aiko Urushibara; Tsukasa Saida; Kensaku Mori; Toshitaka Ishiguro; Kei Inoue; Tomohiko Masumoto; Toyomi Satoh; Takahito Nakajima
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 2.795

Review 5.  Automated Identification of Multiple Findings on Brain MRI for Improving Scan Acquisition and Interpretation Workflows: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kaining Sheng; Cecilie Mørck Offersen; Jon Middleton; Jonathan Frederik Carlsen; Thomas Clement Truelsen; Akshay Pai; Jacob Johansen; Michael Bachmann Nielsen
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.