Literature DB >> 16249835

Flying blind: using a digital dashboard to navigate a complex PACS environment.

Matthew B Morgan1, Barton F Branstetter, Jonathan Mates, Paul J Chang.   

Abstract

Radiology workflows have become more distributed and complicated, and fewer tangible cues are available to the radiologist to help optimize task prioritization and selection. Additionally, faster scanners, more detailed exams, and increased demand for imaging services have precipitated a potential image overload for today's radiologists who are pressured to provide efficient, quality service in less time. Radiologists are faced with the task of operating within complex systems but are lacking tools to efficiently and effectively monitor these systems in real time. Dashboard technology can help address this deficiency in radiology and facilitate informed, optimized decisions about workflow. Possible areas of application include workflow consolidation, workload distribution, and urgency evaluation. Dashboards should be optimized, context-sensitive, customizable, and workflow-integrated. Further research is needed to identify the most important dashboard metrics, determine their optimal display, and validate their utility.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16249835      PMCID: PMC3043949          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-005-8732-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  14 in total

1.  Radiology quality and performance metrics on the Web: a management information and communications tool.

Authors:  S E Seltzer; P Kelly; G M Deibel; P Ros
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Automated examination notification of emergency department images in a picture archiving and communication system.

Authors:  K P Andriole; D E Avrin; E Weber; D M Luth; T M Bazzill
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Reports say diversion on the rise: use technology to overhaul patient flow.

Authors: 
Journal:  ED Manag       Date:  2002-03

4.  Impact of pager notification on report verification times.

Authors:  Kader Karli Oguz; David M Yousem; Tom Deluca; Edward H Herskovits; Norman J Beauchamp
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  CQI progress reports: the dashboard approach provides a better way to keep board informed about quality.

Authors:  B S Bader
Journal:  Healthc Exec       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct

6.  A computerized reminder system to increase the use of preventive care for hospitalized patients.

Authors:  P R Dexter; S Perkins; J M Overhage; K Maharry; R B Kohler; C J McDonald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-09-27       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Addressing the coming radiology crisis-the Society for Computer Applications in Radiology transforming the radiological interpretation process (TRIP) initiative.

Authors:  Katherine P Andriole; Richard L Morin; Ronald L Arenson; John A Carrino; Bradley J Erickson; Steven C Horii; David W Piraino; Bruce I Reiner; J Anthony Seibert; Eliot Siegel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-11-25       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Reminders to physicians from an introspective computer medical record. A two-year randomized trial.

Authors:  C J McDonald; S L Hui; D M Smith; W M Tierney; S J Cohen; M Weinberger; G P McCabe
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Protocol-based computer reminders, the quality of care and the non-perfectability of man.

Authors:  C J McDonald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1976-12-09       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Development and validation of a new index to measure emergency department crowding.

Authors:  Steven L Bernstein; Vinu Verghese; Winifred Leung; Anne T Lunney; Ivelisse Perez
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.451

View more
  9 in total

1.  The radiology digital dashboard: effects on report turnaround time.

Authors:  Matthew B Morgan; Barton F Branstetter; David M Lionetti; Jeremy S Richardson; Paul J Chang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-03-03       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Building blocks for a clinical imaging informatics environment.

Authors:  Marc D Kohli; Max Warnock; Mark Daly; Christopher Toland; Chris Meenan; Paul G Nagy
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Developing an Interactive Data Visualization Tool to Assess the Impact of Decision Support on Clinical Operations.

Authors:  Timothy C Huber; Arun Krishnaraj; Dayna Monaghan; Cree M Gaskin
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  From Information Management to Information Visualization: Development of Radiology Dashboards.

Authors:  Mahtab Karami; Reza Safdari
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  A Deep Learning-based Model for Detecting Abnormalities on Brain MR Images for Triaging: Preliminary Results from a Multisite Experience.

Authors:  Romane Gauriau; Bernardo C Bizzo; Felipe C Kitamura; Osvaldo Landi Junior; Suely F Ferraciolli; Fabiola B C Macruz; Tiago A Sanchez; Marcio R T Garcia; Leonardo M Vedolin; Romeu C Domingues; Emerson L Gasparetto; Katherine P Andriole
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2021-04-21

6.  Optimizing the pathology workstation "cockpit": Challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2010-10-01

Review 7.  A design protocol to develop radiology dashboards.

Authors:  Mahtab Karami
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2014-10-29

8.  A Qualitative Analysis of the Needs and Experiences of Hospital-based Clinicians when Accessing Medical Imaging.

Authors:  Séan Cronin; Bridget Kane; Gavin Doherty
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  A mixed methods evaluation of the maternal-newborn dashboard in Ontario: dashboard attributes, contextual factors, and facilitators and barriers to use: a study protocol.

Authors:  Sandra Dunn; Ann E Sprague; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Ian D Graham; Monica Taljaard; Deshayne Fell; Wendy E Peterson; Elizabeth Darling; JoAnn Harrold; Graeme N Smith; Jessica Reszel; Andrea Lanes; Carolyn Truskoski; Jodi Wilding; Deborah Weiss; Mark Walker
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 7.327

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.