| Literature DB >> 34345197 |
Shivani Dhingra1, Navbir Pasricha1, Eti Sthapak1, Rajan Bhatnagar1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The unprecedented academic environment brought by the COVID-19 pandemic led to the evolution of online teaching as an ineluctable tool for education and training. To ensure that the undergraduate teaching curriculum does not become another victim of the virus, online teaching was started in most medical schools. The undergraduate students enrolled in our institution hail mostly from rural areas and small townships with limited internet connectivity and accessibility due to poor socioeconomic status. This study highlights the students' perception of and motivation towards online classes in respect to internet connectivity and accessibility during COVID-19 pandemic. Since online teaching is essentially a student-centered learning approach, the motivational level of students plays an important role in making teaching protocols effective.Entities:
Keywords: curriculum; feedback; learning; medical education
Year: 2021 PMID: 34345197 PMCID: PMC8325759 DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S312812
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Med Educ Pract ISSN: 1179-7258
Results of Motivation-Based Variables in Percentage Based on a Score from 1 to 5
| Variables | Score | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| Level of motivation and excitement to attend the online lectures | 14.3% | 28.6% | 16.1% | ||
| Lecture presentation for online lectures | 4.8% | 21% | 23.7% | ||
| Objectives for a lecture were achieved at the end of the session | 29.5% | 17.2% | |||
| Online classes increased knowledge and effectiveness for the topics taught | 11.4% | 31.4% | 13.3% | ||
| Understanding of the topics during online lectures | 10.5% | 38.1% | 5.7% | ||
| Experience of enough time being given to clear your doubts during/after the online classes | 14.3% | 26.7% | 24.7% | ||
| Faculty’s interaction with students during the online classes | 4.8% | 14.3% | 32.3% | ||
| Study material of the online classes made available and easily accessible | 11.4% | 20% | 25.7% | ||
| Online teaching method should be considered as a part of regular classroom teaching | 21% | 22.8% | 17.1% | ||
| Satisfaction with the online teaching sessions completed within the stipulated time | 4.8% | 22% | 33.2% | ||
| Agreeing that online classes are equally effective and provide same benefits as that of classroom teaching | 18.1% | 29.5% | 12.4% | ||
| Comfort regarding your personal study space in attending your online classes from your home | 21.9% | 21% | 16.2% | ||
| Lockdown and household responsibilities well managed with your time for studies | 21% | 16.2% | 19% | ||
Notes: 1 for Poor, 2 for Bad, 3 for Neither Poor nor Good, 4 for Good, and 5 for Excellent. Bold:Lowest Value; Bold and Italics: Highest Value.
Results of Internet-Based Variables in Percentage Based on a Score from 1 to 5
| Variables | Score | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| Rate internet connectivity in your region from where you attend your online classes | 37.1% | 17.1% | 4.8% | ||
| Experience of attending online lectures keeping in mind the internet disconnections faced | 25.7% | 24.8% | 5.6% | ||
| Discouragement for attending online classes due to slow computer and poor internet connectivity | 25.7% | 28.6% | 8.6% | ||
| Frequency of experiencing audio-visual lags during online lectures approximately in a week | 12.4% | 12.4% | 13.3% | ||
| Classes missed approximately in a week due to poor internet connectivity | 14.3% | 18.1% | 24.8% | ||
| Experience of submitting the assignments in the given amount of time in respect of internet issues faced | 10.5% | 19% | 23.8% | ||
Notes: 1 for Poor, 2 for Bad, 3 for Neither Poor nor Good, 4 for Good, and 5 for Excellent. Bold: Lowest Value; Bold and Italics: Highest Value.
Results for Calculation of Cronbach’s Alpha for Motivation-Based and Internet Connectivity-Based Variables
| Motivation-Based Number of Variables = 13 | Internet Connectivity-Based Number of Variables = 6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cronbach’s Alpha | Cronbach’s Alpha | |
| M.B.B.S 1st year | 0.884 | 0.838 |
| M.B.B.S 2nd year | 0.926 | 0.886 |
| M.B.B.S 3rd year | 0.917 | 0.811 |
| Total | 0.907 | 0.851 |
Results Showing Internal Consistency Reliability with Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient and p-value
| Motivation vs Internet Connectivity | p-value | |
|---|---|---|
| Pearson Correlation Coefficient (r) | ||
| M.B.B.S 1st year | 0.366 | |
| M.B.B.S 2nd year | 0.426 | |
| M.B.B.S 3rd year | 0.536 | |
| Total | 0.419 |
Note: Bold: Highly Significant p-value.