| Literature DB >> 34344407 |
He Zhao1,2, Jun-Song Yang1, Wei Bao3, Jian Chen4, Ji-Jun Liu1, Peng Liu1, Yan He5, Qing-Da Li1, Bing Qian1,2, Yuan-Ting Zhao6, Ding-Jun Hao7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vertebral augmentation (VA) techniques are used to treat acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). However, the incidence of recurrent vertebral fractures after VA is controversial. Various factors have been discussed in the literature, but no convincing study on the quality of paraspinal muscles has been reported. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the changes in paraspinal muscles and discuss the relationship between paraspinal muscle degeneration and vertebral refractures after percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP).Entities:
Keywords: Imaging modality; Osteoporosis; Paraspinal muscle atrophy; Treatment; Vertebral compression fracture; Vertebral fracture
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34344407 PMCID: PMC8330073 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02623-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Fig. 1Flow diagram of participant screening, exclusion, and grouping
Fig. 2A 66-year-old woman with a OVCF at L4. A Preoperative axial T2-weighted image of L4 was measured. B Routine scan after 11 months reported no refracture occurrence. A areas, M mean grayscale
Fig. 3A 76-year-old woman with a OVCF at L1. A Preoperative axial T2-weighted image of L1. B Same image at L1 when T11 fractured after 7 months. The areas of paraspinal muscle decreased significantly. A areas, M mean grayscale
Comparison of demographic characteristics
| Groups | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Refractured ( | No-refractured ( | |||
| Gender ( | 0.012 | 0.912 | ||
| Males | 11 (33.3) | 19 (32.2) | ||
| Females | 22 (66.7) | 40 (67.8) | ||
| Age (years) | 74.27 ± 8.10 | 75.29 ± 8.51 | 0.558 | 0.578 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.65 ± 2.11 | 22.55 ± 2.14 | − 0.318 | 0.751 |
| Preoperative BMD (T) | − 3.83 ± 0.63 | − 3.65 ± 0.66 | 1.245 | 0.216 |
| Follow-up duration (days) | 215.12 ± 79.47 | 265.24 ± 91.90 | / | |
Categorical data was described as n (%); quantitative data were described as mean ± SD
The main measurements of paraspinal muscles
| Groups | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Refractured ( | No-refractured ( | |||
| Preoperative | 1557.51 (1277.39, 1856.21) | 1566.77 (1305.55, 1930.76) | − 0.094 | 0.925 |
| Final follow-up | 1432.54 (1105.15, 1718.53) | 1512.38 (1278.10, 1970.32) | − 1.176 | 0.239 |
| Percentage change (%) | − 10.1 (− 11.8, − 7.5) | − 1.3 (− 3.0, 0.2) | − 7.442 | < 0.001 |
| Preoperative | 471.07 (404.33, 532.65) | 466.52 (385.81, 579.83) | − 0.550 | 0.583 |
| Final follow-up | 529.31 (438.12, 597.54) | 476.34 (402.25, 587.29) | − 1.221 | 0.222 |
| Percentage change (%) | 10.6 (5.3, 16.7) | 1.4 (− 2.3, 4.1) | − 5.675 | < 0.001 |
| Preoperative | 3.38 ± 0.89 | 3.30 ± 0.88 | 0.412 | 0.681 |
| Final follow-up | 2.71 ± 0.72 | 3.23 ± 0.85 | − 2.933 | 0.004 |
| Percentage change (%) | − 19.2 (− 23.0, − 15.0) | − 2.5 (− 6.3, 0.5) | − 7.738 | < 0.001 |
Normally distributed data were described as mean ± SD, while non-normally distributed data were reported by median (Q1, Q3)
Fig. 4A The change of ROI-CSA and ROI-SI in two MRI scan measurements. B The consequences of correlation analyses conducted by Spearman test