Literature DB >> 34342501

Preoperative Breast MRI for Newly Diagnosed Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Imaging Features and Performance in a Multicenter Setting (ECOG-ACRIN E4112 Trial).

Shinn-Huey S Chou1, Justin Romanoff1, Constance D Lehman1, Seema A Khan1, Ruth Carlos1, Sunil S Badve1, Jennifer Xiao1, Ralph L Corsetti1, Sara H Javid1, Derrick W Spell1, Linda K Han1, Jennifer L Sabol1, John R Bumberry1, Ilana F Gareen1, Bradley S Snyder1, Constantine Gatsonis1, Lynne I Wagner1, Antonio C Wolff1, Kathy D Miller1, Joseph A Sparano1, Christopher E Comstock1, Habib Rahbar1.   

Abstract

Background There are limited data from clinical trials describing preoperative MRI features and performance in the evaluation of mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Purpose To report qualitative MRI features of DCIS, MRI performance in the identification of additional disease, and associations of imaging features with pathologic, genomic, and surgical outcomes from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) E4112 trial. Materials and Methods Secondary analyses of a multicenter prospective clinical trial from the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group included women with DCIS diagnosed with conventional imaging techniques (mammography and US), confirmed via core-needle biopsy (CNB), and enrolled between March 2015 and April 2016 who were candidates for wide local excision (WLE) based on conventional imaging and clinical examination results. DCIS MRI features and pathologic features from CNB and excision were recorded. Each woman without invasive upgrade of the index DCIS at WLE received a 12-gene DCIS score. MRI performance metrics were calculated. Associations of imaging features with invasive upgrade, dichotomized DCIS score (<39 vs ≥39), and single WLE success were estimated in uni- and multivariable analyses. Results Among 339 women (median age, 60 years; interquartile range, 51-66 years), most DCIS cases showed nonmass enhancement (NME) (195 of 339 [58%]) on MRI scans with larger median size than on mammograms (19 mm vs 12 mm; P < .001). Positive predictive value of MRI-prompted CNBs was 32% (21 of 66) (95% CI: 22, 44), yielding an additional cancer detection rate of 6.2% (21 of 339) (95% CI: 4.1, 9.3). MRI false-positive rate was 14.2% (45 of 318) (95% CI: 10.7, 18.4). No imaging features were associated with invasive upgrade or DCIS score (P = .05 to P = .95). Smaller size and focal NME distribution at MRI were linked to single WLE success (P < .001). Conclusion Preoperative MRI depicted ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnosed with conventional imaging most commonly as nonmass enhancement, with larger median span than mammography, and additional cancer detection rate of 6.2%. MRI features of this subset of DCIS did not enable prediction of pathologic or genomic outcomes. Clinical trial registration no. NCT02352883 © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Kuhl in this issue. An earlier incorrect version of this article appeared online. This article was corrected on August 4, 2021.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34342501      PMCID: PMC8474971          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021204743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   29.146


  34 in total

1.  The impact of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging on surgical treatment and outcomes for ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Kaoru Itakura; Juan Lessing; Theadora Sakata; Amy Heinzerling; Eline Vriens; Dorota Wisner; Michael Alvarado; Laura Esserman; Cheryl Ewing; Nola Hylton; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Breast magnetic resonance imaging technique at 1.5 T and 3 T: requirements for quality imaging and American College of Radiology accreditation.

Authors:  Wendy B DeMartini; Habib Rahbar
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.266

3.  Addressing overtreatment of screen detected DCIS; the LORIS trial.

Authors:  Adele Francis; Jeremy Thomas; Lesley Fallowfield; Matthew Wallis; John M S Bartlett; Cassandra Brookes; Tracy Roberts; Sarah Pirrie; Claire Gaunt; Jennie Young; Lucinda Billingham; David Dodwell; Andrew Hanby; Sarah E Pinder; Andrew Evans; Malcolm Reed; Valerie Jenkins; Lucy Matthews; Maggie Wilcox; Patricia Fairbrother; Sarah Bowden; Daniel Rea
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Breast cancer statistics, 2019.

Authors:  Carol E DeSantis; Jiemin Ma; Mia M Gaudet; Lisa A Newman; Kimberly D Miller; Ann Goding Sauer; Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca L Siegel
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  The Impact of Preoperative Breast MRI on Surgical Management of Women with Newly Diagnosed Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Diana L Lam; Jacob Smith; Savannah C Partridge; Adrienne Kim; Sara H Javid; Daniel S Hippe; Constance D Lehman; Janie M Lee; Habib Rahbar
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Women With Local Ductal Carcinoma in Situ to Optimize Surgical Outcomes: Results From the Randomized Phase III Trial IRCIS.

Authors:  Corinne Balleyguier; Ariane Dunant; Luc Ceugnart; Marguerite Kandel; Marie-Pierre Chauvet; Pascal Chérel; Chafika Mazouni; Philippe Henrot; Philippe Rauch; Jocelyne Chopier; Sonia Zilberman; Isabelle Doutriaux-Dumoulin; Isabelle Jaffre; Aurélie Jalaguier; Gilles Houvenaeghel; Nicole Guérin; Françoise Callonnec; Claire Chapellier; Ines Raoust; Marie-Christine Mathieu; Françoise Rimareix; Julia Bonastre; Jean-Rémi Garbay
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Surgical Outcomes for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Impact of Preoperative MRI.

Authors:  Ga Young Yoon; Woo Jung Choi; Hak Hee Kim; Joo Hee Cha; Hee Jung Shin; Eun Young Chae
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  The COMET (Comparison of Operative versus Monitoring and Endocrine Therapy) trial: a phase III randomised controlled clinical trial for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

Authors:  E Shelley Hwang; Terry Hyslop; Thomas Lynch; Elizabeth Frank; Donna Pinto; Desiree Basila; Deborah Collyar; Antonia Bennett; Celia Kaplan; Shoshana Rosenberg; Alastair Thompson; Anna Weiss; Ann Partridge
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Radiomics signature on 3T dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for estrogen receptor-positive invasive breast cancers: Preliminary results for correlation with Oncotype DX recurrence scores.

Authors:  Kyung Jin Nam; Hyunjin Park; Eun Sook Ko; Yaeji Lim; Hwan-Ho Cho; Jeong Eon Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  A multigene expression assay to predict local recurrence risk for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  Lawrence J Solin; Robert Gray; Frederick L Baehner; Steven M Butler; Lorie L Hughes; Carl Yoshizawa; Diana B Cherbavaz; Steven Shak; David L Page; George W Sledge; Nancy E Davidson; James N Ingle; Edith A Perez; William C Wood; Joseph A Sparano; Sunil Badve
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Lars J Grimm; Habib Rahbar; Monica Abdelmalak; Allison H Hall; Marc D Ryser
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Breast MRI during pregnancy and lactation: clinical challenges and technical advances.

Authors:  Noam Nissan; Ethan Bauer; Efi Efraim Moss Massasa; Miri Sklair-Levy
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-04-09

3.  Association Between Surgery Preference and Receipt in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ After Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Ancillary Study of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E4112).

Authors:  Soudabeh Fazeli; Bradley S Snyder; Ilana F Gareen; Constance D Lehman; Seema A Khan; Justin Romanoff; Constantine A Gatsonis; Ralph L Corsetti; Habib Rahbar; Derrick W Spell; Kenneth B Blankstein; Linda K Han; Jennifer L Sabol; John R Bumberry; Kathy D Miller; Joseph A Sparano; Christopher E Comstock; Lynne I Wagner; Ruth C Carlos
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-05-02

4.  Application of deep learning to identify ductal carcinoma in situ and microinvasion of the breast using ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Meng Zhu; Yong Pi; Zekun Jiang; Yanyan Wu; Hong Bu; Ji Bao; Yujuan Chen; Lijun Zhao; Yulan Peng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.