Literature DB >> 32181727

Surgical Outcomes for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Impact of Preoperative MRI.

Ga Young Yoon1, Woo Jung Choi1, Hak Hee Kim1, Joo Hee Cha1, Hee Jung Shin1, Eun Young Chae1.   

Abstract

Background The role of preoperative MRI for predicting surgical outcomes in patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains uncertain. Purpose To investigate the associations between preoperative MRI and surgical outcomes in DCIS confirmed by using US-guided core-needle biopsy (CNB) and to evaluate clinical-pathologic variables associated with a benefit from MRI. Materials and Methods Women with DCIS confirmed by using US-guided CNB between January 2012 and December 2016 were included in this retrospective study. Propensity score matching using 18 confounding covariates was used to create matched groups with MRI and without MRI, and surgical outcomes were compared. Clinical-pathologic variables were evaluated to determine women who benefited from MRI. Results A total of 541 women (mean age ± standard deviation, 50 years ± 10) were evaluated. Among 430 women who underwent MRI, 67 additional lesions (16%) were depicted, with 25 (37%) of the 67 additional lesions being malignant. Fifty-seven (13%) of the 430 women had a change in surgical plan because of their MRI findings; the change was appropriate for 31 (54%) women. In matched groups, the MRI group was associated with lower odds of positive resection margin (odds ratio [OR], 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.16, 0.93; P = .03) and repeat surgery (OR, 0.33; 95% CI: 0.12, 0.92; P = .03) compared with the non-MRI group. There was no difference in likelihood of initial mastectomy (OR, 1.2; 95% CI: 0.7, 2.0; P = .59) and overall mastectomy (OR, 0.93; 95% CI: 0.5, 1.6; P = .79). In the MRI group, low nuclear grade (90% [28 of 31] vs 69% [275 of 399]; P = .01), progesterone receptor positivity (81% [25 of 31] vs 61% [244 of 399]; P = .03), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negativity (90% [28 of 31] vs 68% [270 of 399]; P = .01) were associated with a benefit from MRI versus no MRI. Conclusion Preoperative MRI depicted additional malignancy and reduced positive surgical margins and repeat surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ confirmed at US-guided biopsy without a higher mastectomy rate. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Pinker in this issue.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32181727     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020191535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  8 in total

1.  Intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics based on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for preoperative prediction of intraductal component in invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Hao Xu; Jieke Liu; Zhe Chen; Chunhua Wang; Yuanyuan Liu; Min Wang; Peng Zhou; Hongbing Luo; Jing Ren
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Overcoming Barriers in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Management: From Overtreatment to Optimal Treatment.

Authors:  Jean L Wright; Habib Rahbar; Samilia Obeng-Gyasi; Ruth Carlos; Judy Tjoe; Antonio C Wolff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 50.717

3.  Radiological Underestimation of Tumor Size as a Relevant Risk Factor for Positive Margin Rate in Breast-Conserving Therapy of Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS).

Authors:  Gesche Schultek; Bernd Gerber; Toralf Reimer; Johannes Stubert; Steffi Hartmann; Annett Martin; Angrit Stachs
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Preoperative MRI Improves Surgical Planning and Outcomes for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ.

Authors:  Katja Pinker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 29.146

5.  Role of early post-operative breast MRI: how helpful is it in deciding the next step for women who may have residual disease?

Authors:  Nuala A Healy; John R Benson; Ruchi Sinnatamby
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2021-07-29

6.  Application of deep learning to identify ductal carcinoma in situ and microinvasion of the breast using ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Meng Zhu; Yong Pi; Zekun Jiang; Yanyan Wu; Hong Bu; Ji Bao; Yujuan Chen; Lijun Zhao; Yulan Peng
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-09

7.  Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: a systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC).

Authors:  Carlos Canelo-Aybar; Alvaro Taype-Rondan; Jessica Hanae Zafra-Tanaka; David Rigau; Axel Graewingholt; Annette Lebeau; Elsa Pérez Gómez; Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Miranda Langendam; Margarita Posso; Elena Parmelli; Zuleika Saz-Parkinson; Pablo Alonso-Coello
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Preoperative Breast MRI for Newly Diagnosed Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Imaging Features and Performance in a Multicenter Setting (ECOG-ACRIN E4112 Trial).

Authors:  Shinn-Huey S Chou; Justin Romanoff; Constance D Lehman; Seema A Khan; Ruth Carlos; Sunil S Badve; Jennifer Xiao; Ralph L Corsetti; Sara H Javid; Derrick W Spell; Linda K Han; Jennifer L Sabol; John R Bumberry; Ilana F Gareen; Bradley S Snyder; Constantine Gatsonis; Lynne I Wagner; Antonio C Wolff; Kathy D Miller; Joseph A Sparano; Christopher E Comstock; Habib Rahbar
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 29.146

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.