Literature DB >> 34341832

Genomic prediction and training set optimization in a structured Mediterranean oat population.

Simon Rio1, Luis Gallego-Sánchez2, Gracia Montilla-Bascón2, Francisco J Canales2, Julio Isidro Y Sánchez3, Elena Prats2.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: The strong genetic structure observed in Mediterranean oats affects the predictive ability of genomic prediction as well as the performance of training set optimization methods. In this study, we investigated the efficiency of genomic prediction and training set optimization in a highly structured population of cultivars and landraces of cultivated oat (Avena sativa) from the Mediterranean basin, including white (subsp. sativa) and red (subsp. byzantina) oats, genotyped using genotype-by-sequencing markers and evaluated for agronomic traits in Southern Spain. For most traits, the predictive abilities were moderate to high with little differences between models, except for biomass for which Bayes-B showed a substantial gain compared to other models. The consistency between the structure of the training population and the population to be predicted was key to the predictive ability of genomic predictions. The predictive ability of inter-subspecies predictions was indeed much lower than that of intra-subspecies predictions for all traits. Regarding training set optimization, the linear mixed model optimization criteria (prediction error variance (PEVmean) and coefficient of determination (CDmean)) performed better than the heuristic approach "partitioning around medoids," even under high population structure. The superiority of CDmean and PEVmean could be explained by their ability to adapt the representation of each genetic group according to those represented in the population to be predicted. These results represent an important step towards the implementation of genomic prediction in oat breeding programs and address important issues faced by the genomic prediction community regarding population structure and training set optimization.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Avena sativa; Environmental adaptation; Genetic structure; Genomic prediction; Oat; Training set optimization

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34341832     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-021-03916-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  16 in total

1.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies.

Authors:  Daniel Falush; Matthew Stephens; Jonathan K Pritchard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Modeling Epistasis in Genomic Selection.

Authors:  Yong Jiang; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study.

Authors:  G Evanno; S Regnaut; J Goudet
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Genomic-assisted prediction of genetic value with semiparametric procedures.

Authors:  Daniel Gianola; Rohan L Fernando; Alessandra Stella
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Reproducing kernel hilbert spaces regression methods for genomic assisted prediction of quantitative traits.

Authors:  Daniel Gianola; Johannes B C H M van Kaam
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Reliability of genomic predictions across multiple populations.

Authors:  A P W de Roos; B J Hayes; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Optimal Designs for Genomic Selection in Hybrid Crops.

Authors:  Tingting Guo; Xiaoqing Yu; Xianran Li; Haozhe Zhang; Chengsong Zhu; Sherry Flint-Garcia; Michael D McMullen; James B Holland; Stephen J Szalma; Randall J Wisser; Jianming Yu
Journal:  Mol Plant       Date:  2019-01-06       Impact factor: 13.164

Review 8.  Random forests for genomic data analysis.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Hemant Ishwaran
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 5.736

9.  Design of training populations for selective phenotyping in genomic prediction.

Authors:  Deniz Akdemir; Julio Isidro-Sánchez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Haplotype-based genotyping-by-sequencing in oat genome research.

Authors:  Wubishet A Bekele; Charlene P Wight; Shiaoman Chao; Catherine J Howarth; Nicholas A Tinker
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 9.803

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Breeding oat for resistance to the crown rust pathogen Puccinia coronata f. sp. avenae: achievements and prospects.

Authors:  R F Park; W H P Boshoff; A L Cabral; J Chong; J A Martinelli; M S McMullen; J W Mitchell Fetch; E Paczos-Grzęda; E Prats; J Roake; S Sowa; L Ziems; D Singh
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Development of a Model for Genomic Prediction of Multiple Traits in Common Bean Germplasm, Based on Population Structure.

Authors:  Jing Shao; Yangfan Hao; Lanfen Wang; Yuxin Xie; Hongwei Zhang; Jiangping Bai; Jing Wu; Junjie Fu
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-12

3.  Heritable Variation of Foliar Spectral Reflectance Enhances Genomic Prediction of Hydrogen Cyanide in a Genetically Structured Population of Eucalyptus.

Authors:  Paulina Ballesta; Sunny Ahmar; Gustavo A Lobos; Daniel Mieres-Castro; Felipe Jiménez-Aspee; Freddy Mora-Poblete
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.753

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.