| Literature DB >> 34339338 |
Miaomiao Wang1, José Alejandro Bohórquez1, Yoandry Hinojosa2,3,4,5, Sara Muñoz-González1, Markus Gerber2,3, Liani Coronado5, Carmen Laura Perera5, Matthias Liniger2,3, Nicolas Ruggli2,3, Llilianne Ganges1.
Abstract
The prevalence of low virulence classical swine fever virus (CSFV) strains makes viral eradication difficult in endemic countries. However, the determinants for natural CSFV attenuation and persistence in the field remain unidentified. The aim of the present study was to assess the role of the RNase activity of CSFV Erns in pathogenesis, immune response, persistent infection, and viral transmission in pigs. To this end, a functional cDNA clone pPdR-H30K-36U with an Erns lacking RNase activity was constructed based on the low virulence CSFV field isolate Pinar de Rio (PdR). Eighteen 5-day-old piglets were infected with vPdR-H30K-36U. Nine piglets were introduced as contacts. The vPdR-H30K-36U virus was attenuated in piglets compared to the parental vPdR-36U. Only RNA traces were detected in sera and body secretions and no virus was isolated from tonsils, showing that RNase inactivation may reduce CSFV persistence and transmissibility. The vPdR-H30K-36U mutant strongly activated the interferon-α (IFN-α) production in plasmacytoid dendritic cells, while in vivo, the IFN-α response was variable, from moderate to undetectable depending on the animal. This suggests a role of the CSFV Erns RNase activity in the regulation of innate immune responses. Infection with vPdR-H30K-36U resulted in higher antibody levels against the E2 and Erns glycoproteins and in enhanced neutralizing antibody responses when compared with vPdR-36U. These results pave the way toward a better understanding of viral attenuation mechanisms of CSFV in pigs. In addition, they provide novel insights relevant for the development of DIVA vaccines in combination with diagnostic assays for efficient CSF control.Entities:
Keywords: Classical swine fever virus (CSFV); Erns RNase activity; Pestivirus; humoral response; type I IFN; viral attenuation; viral persistence; viral replication; viral transmission
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34339338 PMCID: PMC8331007 DOI: 10.1080/21505594.2021.1959715
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Virulence ISSN: 2150-5594 Impact factor: 5.882
Figure 1.Kinetics of virus replication in PEDSV.15 cells and porcine MDM. PEDSV.15 cells and porcine MDM were infected in quadruplicate or in triplicate with vPdR-36U (in blue) or vPdR-H30K-36U (in red), respectively. The mean virus titer was determined in SK-6 cells at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 72 h.p.i and error bars show the standard deviation
Figure 2.RNase activity assay with vPdR-36U and vPdR-H. SK-6 cells were infected with vPdR-36U or vPdR-H30K-36U or mock or left uninfected. The cells were lysed after 44 hours and the extracts were incubated with the Dy-781-O1-RNA probe. The probe (black arrowhead) treated with the different cell extracts as indicated was separated by urea/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Positive and negative controls were included in lanes 1 and 2, respectively
Figure 3.IFN-α induction in pDC by co-culture with infected MDM or by direct infection with vPdR-36U or vPdR-H. (a) Mean IFN-α concentration in cell culture supernatants from enriched pDC co-cultured with uninfected MDM (white bars) or MDM infected with the vPdR-36U (orange bars) or vPdR-H30K-36U (gray bars, left panel) or from pDC infected directly with the indicated respective viruses (right panel). (b) The level of infection of the MDM by the respective viruses is shown as percentage of optical density (% OD) of the vPdR-36U signal obtained after immunoperoxidase staining of E2. Means and standard deviations (error bars) were calculated from six parallel cultures
Figure 4.Individual clinical signs evaluated after vPdR-H. Pigs 1 to 18 were inoculated with vPdR-H30K-36U and pigs 19 to 27 served as contact pigs introduced 24 hours post infection. The clinical signs were monitored daily during the complete study. Different shades of gray represent the severity of the clinical signs according to the legend
Figure 5.Detection of CSFV RNA in sera, tonsils and swabs. The CSFV RNA content was determined by RT-qPCR in the sera at weekly intervals (a) the tonsils obtained at necropsy (b) and the rectal and nasal swabs (c) collected on a weekly basis. Ct values higher than 40 (shaded area under the dotted line) were considered as negative
Figure 6.IFN-α levels in sera during the first two weeks post infection. Serum IFN-α levels were determined on the first (yellow symbols) and second (blue symbols) week after infection with vPdR-H30K-36U. The black lines represent mean values
Figure 7.Evaluation of the humoral immune response after vPdR-H. (a) The E2-specific antibody responses after infection with vPdR-H30K-36U and vPdR-36U are shown as percentage of blocking as measured by ELISA. Values between 30 and 40% of blocking were considered doubtful, and values equal or greater than 40% were considered positive. (b) The Erns-specific antibody responses after vPdR-H30K-36U and vPdR-36U infection are shown as S/P ratios as determined by ELISA. S/P ratios between 0.3 and 0.5 were considered doubtful, S/P ratios equal or greater than 0.5 were considered as positive. (c) The neutralizing antibody titers after vPdR-H30K-36U and vPdR-36U infection were determined by the NPLA at weekly intervals. Neutralizing antibody titers from low to high are represented on a scale from light to deep blue. Negative samples are shown in white. A cross shows that the animal was euthanized or dead