| Literature DB >> 32962557 |
Alexander Postel1, Paul Becher1.
Abstract
Classical swine fever (CSF) is one of the most important viral diseases of pigs. In many countries, the use of vaccines is restricted due to limitations of subunit vaccines with regard to efficacy and onset of protection as well as failure of live vaccines to differentiate infected from vaccinated animals (DIVA principle). Chimeric pestiviruses based on CSF virus (CSFV) and the related bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) have been licensed as live marker vaccines in Europe and Asia, but cross-reactive antibodies can cause problems in DIVA application due to close antigenic relationship. To develop marker vaccine candidates with improved DIVA properties, three chimeric viruses were generated by replacing Erns of CSFV Alfort-Tübingen with homologue proteins of only distantly related pestiviruses. The chimeric viruses "Ra", "Pro", and "RaPro" contained Erns sequences of Norway rat and Pronghorn pestiviruses or a combination of both, respectively. In porcine cells, the "Pro" chimera replicated to high titers, while replication of the "Ra" chimera was limited. The "RaPro" chimera showed an intermediate phenotype. All vaccine candidates were attenuated in a vaccination/ challenge trial in pigs, but to different extents. Inoculation induced moderate to high levels of neutralizing antibodies that protected against infection with a genetically heterologous, highly virulent CSFV. Importantly, serum samples of vaccinated animals did not show any cross-reactivity in a CSFV Erns antibody ELISA. In conclusion, the Erns antigen from distantly related pestiviruses can provide a robust serological negative marker for a new generation of improved CSFV marker vaccines based on the chimeric pestivirus concept.Entities:
Keywords: Classical swine fever virus; DIVA concept; antibody ELISA; attenuation; chimeric virus; marker vaccine; pestivirus
Year: 2020 PMID: 32962557 PMCID: PMC7580611 DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1826893
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Microbes Infect ISSN: 2222-1751 Impact factor: 7.163
Figure 1.Construction and characterization of chimeric pestiviruses. (A) Genome structure of the chimeric CSFV vaccine candidates. The reverse genetic system allows to generate synthetic genome-like RNAs of CSFV Alfort-p2477 by sp6-driven RNA synthesis after plasmid linearization with SmaI. The chimeric derivatives of CSFV designated “Ra”, “Pro” and “RaPro” contain the Erns coding sequences of the Norway rat and Pronghorn pestiviruses or a combination of both, respectively. Adaptive mutations identified in the “Ra” and “RaPro” vaccine stocks are indicated as asterisks. (B) Porcine kidney cell cultures three days after infection with the chimeric pestiviruses “Ra”, “RaPro” and “Pro” and visualization by immunoperoxidase staining with the pestivirus specific mab BVD/C16.
Figure 2.In vivo characterization of chimeric vaccine candidates. (A) Experimental design. Groups of five pigs were vaccinated each, only the unvaccinated group (challenge control) consisted of three animals. Time points of sampling are indicated below the time axis. Three severely diseased animals of the attenuation control group were sacrificed 18 dpi (†) and finally sampled. (B) Body temperature (top) and clinical presentation (bottom). Clinical scores were calculated as previously proposed by Mittelholzer [20] with slight modifications as described earlier [16]. (C) Time course of blood cell parameters. Reference ranges for leucocytes (10–22 G/l) and for thrombocytes (201–737 G/l) are highlighted in grey. (D) Genome equivalents (GE) of vaccine candidates in the blood and shedding via saliva and faeces.
Characteristics of CSFV strains and vaccine candidates.
| Group | CSFV controls | Vaccine candidate | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Challenge | Attenuation | “Ra” | “RaPro” | “Pro” | |
| Spread | Continuous | Continuous | Small foci | foci | Continuous |
| Titer [TCID50/ml] | 10 5.8 | 10 6.1 | 10 4.4 | 10 5.3 | 10 6.0 |
| Volume [ml/pig] | 2.0 | 1.0 | 3.2 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Dose [TCID50/pig] | 10 6.7 | 10 4.60* | 10 5.05* | 10 4.75* | 10 4.64* |
| Route [vaccination/challenge] | —/oral | i.m./— | i.m./oral | i.m./oral | i.m./oral |
*Inoculum titration of vaccine virus stock, diluted to contain 105.0 TCID50.
Detection of CSFV genomes in selected tissues.
| Group | Tissue | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tonsil | Spleen | Kidney | Parotis | ||
| “Pro” | + | + | + | + | − |
| + | + | + | − | − | |
| + | + | − | − | − | |
| + | + | − | − | − | |
| − | + | − | − | − | |
| “RaPro” | + | + | − | − | − |
| + | − | − | − | − | |
| − | − | − | − | − | |
| − | − | − | − | − | |
| − | − | − | − | − | |
| “Ra” | + | + | − | − | − |
| + | + | − | − | − | |
| + | + | − | − | − | |
| + | + | − | − | − | |
| + | − | − | − | − | |
| Attenuation | + | + | + | + | + |
| Control | + | + | + | + | + |
| + | + | + | + | + | |
| + | + | + | + | + | |
| + | + | + | + | + | |
| Challenge | + | + | + | + | + |
| Control | + | + | + | + | + |
| + | + | + | + | + | |
Note: Representative positive tissues (+) of vaccinated animals were analysed by nucleotide sequencing to discriminate between vaccine strain (blue) and challenge virus (orange).
Figure 3.Characterization of the humoral immune response and DIVA properties. (A). Mean neutralizing titers [ND50] of three independent titrations and standard deviations. The three rows show the kinetics of neutralizing Ab induced after vaccination with the “Pro”, “RaPro” and “Ra” chimera and subsequent challenge infection. Virus neutralization was performed with the homologous parental CSFV strain Alfort-p2477 (genotype 2.3) and the heterologous highly virulent challenge virus Koslov (genotype 1.1). (B) Seroconversion and DIVA properties of the vaccine candidates. Detection of CSFV specific antibodies was performed by conventional E2 Ab ELISA (upper panel) and DIVA Erns Ab ELISA (lower panel). Shaded boxes indicate doubtful ranges in the respective ELISAs; values above are positive and values below are negative.