| Literature DB >> 34336997 |
Joel-Ching-Jue Wong1, Siew-Ling Hii1, Chen-Chung Koh1.
Abstract
There has been a high amount of attention given to prebiotics due to their significant physiological function and health benefits. Prebiotics contain nondigestible compounds that allow specific changes, both in the growth and in the activity of bacteria in the host gastrointestinal tract, that provide benefits upon the host by promoting a healthy digestive system and preventing disease. This study aims at investigating the potential prebiotic activity of bioactive compounds extracted from the seeds of an underutilized indigenous plant Artocarpus integer (A. integer). The optimum microwave-assisted extraction conditions were a microwave power of 1500 W, extraction time of 180 s, and solvent-to-sample ratio of 1000 : 1. The maximum amount of the total carbohydrate content extracted from A. integer was 787 mg/L. The percentage hydrolysis levels of A. integer extract in gastric juice at pH 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 6.14%, 7.12%, 8.98%, and 10.23%, respectively. For enzymatic digestion, the percentage of hydrolysis was 0.16% at pH 7. A. integer extract was found to support the growth of probiotics such as L. acidophilus and L. casei. After 72 hours of incubation, L. acidophilus achieved 6.96 log10 CFU, whereas L. casei reached 8.33 log10 CFU. The study makes an important contribution to the development of the use of Sarawakian underutilized plants and to the identification of new sources of prebiotic materials to be used in food.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34336997 PMCID: PMC8318755 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9940078
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Food Sci ISSN: 2314-5765
Independent variables and their levels used in two-level FFD.
| Independent variable | Notation | Unit | Low (−1) | High (+1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microwave power |
| Watt | 150 | 1500 |
| Extraction time |
| Seconds | 30 | 180 |
| Solvent-sample ratio |
| — | 100 | 1000 |
Design matrix of two-level FFD with total carbohydrate (Y) as response.
| Runs | Experimental factorsa | Total carbohydrate (mg/L)b | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 1 | −1 (150) | −1 (30) | −1(100) | 22 |
| 2 | −1 (80) | +1 (180) | −1 (100) | 37 |
| 3 | −1 (150) | −1 (30) | +1 (1000) | 177 |
| 4 | −1 (150) | +1 (180) | +1 (1000) | 167 |
| 5 | −1 (150) | +1 (180) | +1 (1000) | 227 |
| 6 | 0 (825) | 0 (105) | 0 (550) | 415 |
| 7 | 0 (825) | 0 (105) | 0 (550) | 447 |
| 8 | 0 (825) | 0 (105) | 0 (550) | 364 |
| 9 | +1 (1500) | +1 (180) | +1 (1000) | 905 |
| 10 | +1 (1500) | +1 (180) | +1 (1000) | 872 |
| 11 | +1 (1500) | −1 (30) | −1 (100) | 34 |
| 12 | −1 (150) | −1 (30) | +1 (1000) | 219 |
| 13 | 0 (825) | 0 (105) | 0 (550) | 339 |
| 14 | +1 (1500) | +1 (180) | −1 (100) | 94 |
| 15 | +1 (1500) | −1 (30) | −1 (100) | 28 |
| 16 | −1 (150) | −1 (30) | −1 (100) | 36 |
| 17 | +1 (1500) | +1 (180) | −1 (100) | 80 |
| 18 | +1 (1500) | −1 (30) | +1 (1000) | 194 |
| 19 | −1 (150) | +1 (180) | −1 (100) | 97 |
| 20 | +1 (1500) | −1 (30) | +1 (1000) | 170 |
| 21 | 0 (825) | 0 (105) | 0 (550) | 345 |
| 22 | 0 (825) | 0 (105) | 0 (550) | 393 |
aFactors: A: microwave power (watts); B: extraction time (seconds); C: ratio of solvent to sample. Uncoded values are presented in brackets. bExperimental results of the response under investigation.
Design matrix of augmented CCD.
| Runs | Experimental factorsa | Total carbohydrate (mg/L)b | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 23 | −1 (150) | 0 (105) | 0 (550) | 64 |
| 24 | 0 (825) | 0 (105) | −1 (100) | 41 |
| 25 | 0 (825) | −1 (30) | 0 (550) | 67 |
| 26 | +1 (1500) | 0 (105) | 0 (550) | 230 |
| 27 | 0 (825) | +1 (180) | 0 (550) | 199 |
| 28 | 0 (825) | 0 (105) | +1 (1000) | 299 |
aFactors: A: microwave power (watts); B: extraction time (seconds); C: solvent-sample ratio. Uncoded units are presented in brackets. bExperimental results of the response under investigation.
ANOVA of two-level FFD.
| Source | Sum of squaresa (×105) |
| Mean squarec (×105) |
|
| Remark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 11.24 | 7 | 1.605 | 177.71 | <0.0001 | Significant |
|
| 1.216 | 1 | 1.216 | 134.64 | <0.0001 | |
|
| 1.598 | 1 | 1.598 | 176.90 | <0.0001 | |
|
| 3.916 | 1 | 3.916 | 433.47 | <0.0001 | |
|
| 1.316 | 1 | 1.316 | 145.67 | <0.0001 | |
|
| 1.068 | 1 | 1.068 | 118.19 | <0.0001 | |
|
| 0.935 | 1 | 0.935 | 103.49 | <0.0001 | |
|
| 1.189 | 1 | 1.189 | 131.57 | <0.0001 | |
| Curvature | 0.998 | 1 | 0.998 | 110.45 | <0.0001 | Significant |
| Pure error | 0.090 | 13 | 0.090 | |||
| Cor total | 12.320 | 21 |
aSum of the differences between the squared value of the average value and the overall mean. bDegree of freedom. cSum of squares divided by df. dRatio of the mean regression sum of squares divided by the mean error sum of squares. eProbability of seeing the observed F value if the null hypothesis is true.
Response surface reduced cubic model for the total carbohydrate content.
| Source | Sum of squares (×105) |
| Mean square (×105) |
|
| Remark |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Block | 0.543 | 1 | 0.543 | |||
| Model | 13.05 | 9 | 1.450 | 112.49 | <0.0001 | Significant |
|
| 1.354 | 1 | 1.354 | 104.99 | <0.0001 | |
|
| 1.665 | 1 | 1.665 | 129.10 | <0.0001 | |
|
| 4.235 | 1 | 4.235 | 328.46 | <0.0001 | |
|
| 1.316 | 1 | 1.316 | 102.05 | <0.0001 | |
|
| 1.068 | 1 | 1.068 | 82.80 | <0.0001 | |
|
| 0.935 | 1 | 0.935 | 72.50 | <0.0001 | |
|
| 0.190 | 1 | 0.190 | 14.74 | 0.0013 | |
|
| 0.267 | 1 | 0.267 | 20.67 | 0.0003 | |
|
| 1.189 | 1 | 1.189 | 92.18 | <0.0001 | |
| Residual | 0.219 | 17 | 0.013 | |||
| Lack of fit | 0.074 | 4 | 0.019 | 1.67 | 0.2170 | Not significant |
| Pure error | 0.149 | 13 | 0.011 | |||
| Cor total | 13.82 | 27 |
Regression analysis of variance for total carbohydrate content.
| Source | Value |
|---|---|
| SDa | 35.91 |
| Mean | 234.39 |
| CV %b | 15.32 |
| PRESSc | 52712.06 |
|
| 0.9835 |
| Adjusted | 0.9747 |
| Predicted | 0.9603 |
| Adequate precision | 38.399 |
aStandard deviation. bPercentage of coefficient of variation. cPredicted residual sum of squares.
Figure 1Response surface plot showing the effect of microwave power and extraction time on the total carbohydrate content.
Figure 2Response surface plot showing the effect of extraction time and solvent-sample ratio on the total carbohydrate content.
Figure 3Response surface plot showing the effect of microwave power and solvent-sample ratio on the total carbohydrate content.
Verification of model.
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
|
| 1500 W |
|
| 180 s |
|
| 1000 : 1 |
| Predicted carbohydrate concentration | 797.08 mg/L |
| Actual carbohydrate concentration | 787.49 mg/L |
| % difference | 1.2% |
Percentage hydrolysis by A. integer and inulin after gastric juice digestion in various pH.
| pH | % hydrolysis | |
|---|---|---|
|
| Inulin | |
| 1 | 6.14 ± 0.71a | 0.00 ± 0.00a |
| 2 | 7.12 ± 0.36ab | 0.72 ± 0.01b |
| 3 | 8.98 ± 0.71bc | 0.90 ± 0.06c |
| 4 | 10.23 ± 0.36c | 1.16 ± 0.02d |
All results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of three replicates. Results in the same column followed by different superscripts are significantly different (Tukey test, p < 0.05).
Percentage hydrolysis of A. integer and inulin after enzymatic digestion and absorption at pH 7.
| % hydrolysis | |
|---|---|
|
| 0.16 ± 0.12a |
| Inulin | 0.09 ± 0.04a |
Growth of L. acidophilus, L. casei, and E. coli in media containing A. integer extract and inulin as the sole carbon source.
| Time (hours) | log10 CFU/mL | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Extract | Inulin | Extract | Inulin | Extract | Inulin | |
| 0 | 2.46 ± 0.20a | 2.31 ± 0.25a | 2.94 ± 0.08a | 2.98 ± 0.08a | 2.79 ± 0.02a | 2.45 ± 0.17a |
| 24 | 6.49 ± 0.25b | 6.02 ± 0.07b | 5.36 ± 0.06b | 5.48 ± 0.20b | 9.09 ± 0.02b | 9.11 ± 0.12bc |
| 48 | 6.66 ± 0.07b | 5.99 ± 0.55b | 7.45 ± 0.22c | 7.69 ± 0.17c | 9.11 ± 0.12b | 9.28 ± 0.15b |
| 72 | 6.96 ± 0.34b | 7.05 ± 0.06c | 8.33 ± 0.17d | 8.53 ± 0.17d | 8.90 ± 0.07c | 8.84 ± 0.22c |
All results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of three replicates. Results in the same column followed by different superscripts are significantly different (Tukey test, p < 0.05).