| Literature DB >> 34331615 |
Takehiro Uno1, Kouichi Misaki2, Kazuya Futami3, Iku Nambu1, Akifumi Yoshikawa1, Tomoya Kamide1, Naoyuki Uchiyama1, Mitsutoshi Nakada1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although bleb formation increases the risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms, previous computational fluid dynamic (CFD) studies have been unable to identify robust causative hemodynamic factors, due to the morphological differences of prebleb aneurysm models and a small number of aneurysms with de novo bleb formation. This study investigated the influences of differences in the aneurysm-models and identify causative hemodynamic factors for de novo bleb formation.Entities:
Keywords: Computational fluid dynamics; De novo bleb formation; Hemodynamic factors; Intracranial aneurysms; Pressure; Wall shear stress
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34331615 PMCID: PMC8860802 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-021-05482-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurol Sci ISSN: 1590-1874 Impact factor: 3.307
Fig. 1Three vessel models created for an aneurysm in Case 1. a The actual prebleb model created from image data obtained by three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography (3D CTA) before de novo bleb formation. b Postbleb model based on 3D CTA image data after de novo bleb formation. d The virtual prebleb model created by manually removing bleb (c) from postbleb model (b)
Fig. 2Points evenly distributed with a 0.5-mm distance using an ANSYS CFX function of the point cloud on the whole aneurysm surface, which exhibits the contour maps of normalized pressure in the actual prebleb models of Cases 1 (a) and 2 (b). Hemodynamic parameters were measured at the center of a boll mark which was the symbol of the distributed points. The dotted circle indicates the area of de novo bleb formation. Statistical analysis was performed to compare hemodynamics at points on areas with and without de novo bleb formation
Fig. 3A right middle cerebral artery aneurysm in case 1 (upper row) and anterior communicating artery aneurysm in case 2 (lower row). Red arrowheads show bleb lesions in both cases. a–f Blood flow velocity maps at peak systole in the actual prebleb (a and d), virtual prebleb (b and e), and postbleb (c and f) models. In both cases, the bleb occurred around the area (*) where the high flow vectors changed the flow direction accompanied by a decrease in the flow velocity rather than around the inflow impingement zone (**)
Fig. 4Contour maps of normalized pressure (a and f), normalized wall shear stress (WSS) (b and g), time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS) (c and h), and oscillatory shear index (OSI) (d and i) in addition to WSS vectors (e and j) on the aneurysm wall in the actual and virtual prebleb models for an aneurysm in both cases. The results of normalized pressure, normalized WSS, and WSS vectors were used at the peak systole of the second cycle. The dotted line indicates the area of de novo bleb formation, and arrowheads indicate the center of divergent WSS vectors. Computational fluid dynamics analysis revealed that the bleb occurred in the region of high normalized pressure, low normalized WSS, low TAWSS and partially high OSI, and the center of divergent WSS vectors in both the actual and virtual prebleb models
The magnitude of hemodynamic parameters of points in the areas with and without bleb formation
| Case 1 ( | Case 2 ( | Total ( | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bleb formation area | Area without bleb formation ( | Bleb formation area | Area without bleb formation ( | Bleb formation area | Area without bleb formation ( | ||||
| Normalized Pressure | 1.04 ± 0.005 | 1.01 ± 0.05 | < 0.001* | 1.09 ± 0.005 | 1.05 ± 0.03 | < 0.001* | 1.06 ± 0.03 | 1.03 ± 0.04 | < 0.001* |
| Normalized WSS | 0.33 ± 0.17 | 0.76 ± 0.30 | < 0.001* | 0.52 ± 0.32 | 0.93 ± 0.53 | 0.033* | 0.42 ± 0.30 | 0.85 ± 0.44 | < 0.001* |
| TAWSS (Pa) | 7.28 ± 3.09 | 12.61 ± 5.99 | 0.054 | 1.33 ± 0.72 | 2.81 ± 1.64 | 0.071 | 4.30 ± 3.72 | 7.43 ± 6.49 | 0.14 |
| OSI | 0.0046 ± 0.0044 | 0.0030 ± 0.0024 | 0.70 | 0.0145 ± 0.0125 | 0.0113 ± 0.0269 | 0.55 | 0.0095 ± 0.0106 | 0.0073 ± 0.0199 | 0.53 |
| The center of divergent WSS vectors, N (%) | 1 (9.0) | 1 (0.7) | 0.156 | 1 (12.5) | 1 (0.7) | 0.114 | 2 (10.5) | 2 (0.7) | 0.025* |
Values are shown as mean ± SD when appropriate. Mann–Whitney U test was used for statistical analysis of all parameters except for the center of divergent WSS vectors for which Fisher exact test was used. A P value < 0.05 was considered significant. * indicates significant; WSS wall shear stress; TAWSS time-averaged wall shear stress; OSI oscillatory shear index; n the number of points evenly distributed on the aneurysm surface; N the number of the center of divergent WSS vectors
Hemodynamic parameters associated with de novo bleb formation in unruptured intracranial aneurysms
| Unruptured aneurysms (n) | Model for CFD | Pressure | WSS | OSI | WSS vector | Relation with intra-aneurysm flow | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Russell et al. (2013) [ | 9 | Virtual | - | Maximum (78%) | - | - | - |
| Sugiyama et al. (2016) [ | 1 | Actual | High | Heterogenous | - | - | Along low velocity flow after inflow impingement |
| Machi et al. (2017) [ | 3 | Actual | - | Low | High | - | - |
| Present case (2020) | 2 | Actual and Virtual | High | Low | High | Divergent | Along major intra-aneurysmal flow |
aWithin 9 unruptured aneurysms of total 27, the relationship of bleb formation and pressure, OSI, WSS vector, or intra-aneurysmal flow was not examined. n the number of aneurysms; CFD computational fluid dynamics; WSS wall shear stress; OSI oscillatory shear index; -, not examined