Literature DB >> 29566209

High Pressure in Virtual Postcoiling Model is a Predictor of Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysm Recurrence After Coiling.

Iku Nambu1, Kouichi Misaki1, Naoyuki Uchiyama1, Masanao Mohri1, Takashi Suzuki2,3, Hiroyuki Takao3, Yuichi Murayama3, Kazuya Futami4, Tomoki Kawamura5, Yasushi Inoguchi5, Teruo Matsuzawa5, Mitsutoshi Nakada1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic factors play a crucial role in the recurrence of intracranial aneurysms after coiling. However, the strongest factor for predicting recurrence remains unclear because each risk factor has been investigated and reported separately.
OBJECTIVE: To clarify the strongest predictor of recurrence with computational fluid dynamics (CFD).
METHODS: Using pretreatment patient-specific 3-dimensional rotational angiography data of 50 internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms (7 recanalized, 43 stable) treated with endovascular coiling, we created a precoiling model and a virtual postcoiling model produced by manually cutting the aneurysm by the flat plane corresponding to the virtual coil surface. We conducted CFD analysis to investigate inflow dynamics in the precoiling model and pressure difference and wall shear stress on the virtual coil surface. The pressure difference was calculated by subtracting average pressure at the proximal ICA from the maximum pressure at the coil surface and dividing by dynamic pressure at the proximal ICA for normalization. We compared hemodynamic parameters in both models between recanalized and stable aneurysms.
RESULTS: Compared with stable aneurysms, recanalized aneurysms showed a significantly larger inflow area and higher inflow rate in the precoiling model (P = .016, .028), and higher pressure difference at the coil surface in the postcoiling model (P < .001). The receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed that the area under the curve value for the pressure difference (0.967) was superior to that of other evaluated parameters.
CONCLUSION: The pressure difference in the virtual postcoiling model may be a strong predictor of recurrence after coiling.
Copyright © 2018 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebral aneurysm; Coil embolization; Computational fluid dynamics; Inflow rate ratio; Pressure difference; Recurrence after coil embolization

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29566209     DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyy073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  3 in total

1.  Hemodynamic Comparison of Treatment Strategies for Intracranial Vertebral Artery Fusiform Aneurysms.

Authors:  Yeqing Jiang; Gang Lu; Liang Ge; Rong Zou; Gaohui Li; Hailin Wan; Xiaochang Leng; Jianping Xiang; Xiaolong Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.086

2.  Recurrence pattern predicts aneurysm rupture after coil embolization.

Authors:  Iku Nambu; Kouichi Misaki; Takehiro Uno; Akifumi Yoshikawa; Naoyuki Uchiyama; Masanao Mohri; Mitsutoshi Nakada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Hemodynamic factor evaluation using computational fluid dynamics analysis for de novo bleb formation in unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Takehiro Uno; Kouichi Misaki; Kazuya Futami; Iku Nambu; Akifumi Yoshikawa; Tomoya Kamide; Naoyuki Uchiyama; Mitsutoshi Nakada
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 3.307

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.