Literature DB >> 15165551

Neuronal representations of cognitive state: reward or attention?

John H R Maunsell1.   

Abstract

The effects of spatial or featural attention on the activity of neurons have been studied in many experiments that have used a variety of neurophysiological approaches. Other experiments have examined how expectations about reward are represented in neuronal activity in various brain regions. Although attention and reward are distinct concepts, I argue here that many neurophysiological experiments on attention and reward do not permit a clean dissociation between the two. This problem arises in part because reward contingencies are the only parameter manipulated in any of these experiments. I describe how attention and reward expectations have been confounded, giving rise to uncertainty about how signals related to attention and reward are distributed in the brain.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15165551     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  175 in total

Review 1.  The role of neuromodulators in selective attention.

Authors:  Behrad Noudoost; Tirin Moore
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 2.  A computational framework for the study of confidence in humans and animals.

Authors:  Adam Kepecs; Zachary F Mainen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Mirror neurons encode the subjective value of an observed action.

Authors:  Vittorio Caggiano; Leonardo Fogassi; Giacomo Rizzolatti; Antonino Casile; Martin A Giese; Peter Thier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Neural correlates of correct and errant attentional selection revealed through N2pc and frontal eye field activity.

Authors:  Richard P Heitz; Jeremiah Y Cohen; Geoffrey F Woodman; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Supplementary eye field encodes option and action value for saccades with variable reward.

Authors:  Na-Young So; Veit Stuphorn
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Population response profiles in early visual cortex are biased in favor of more valuable stimuli.

Authors:  John T Serences; Sameer Saproo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Cognitive-motivational interactions: beyond boxes-and-arrows models of the mind-brain.

Authors:  Luiz Pessoa
Journal:  Motiv Sci       Date:  2017-09

Review 8.  The mirror mechanism: recent findings and perspectives.

Authors:  Giacomo Rizzolatti; Leonardo Fogassi
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 9.  Decoding Cognitive Processes from Neural Ensembles.

Authors:  Joni D Wallis
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Linking neural activity to complex decisions.

Authors:  Benjamin Hayden; Tatiana Pasternak
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.