Literature DB >> 34324018

On the variability of motor-evoked potentials: experimental results and mathematical model.

Charles Capaday1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the form of the relation between the mean amplitude and variance of motor-evoked potentials (MEP). To this end, single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied over the motor cortex of seventeen neurologically normal adult human subjects. The coil was positioned at a locus on the scalp that elicited an MEP in the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) at the lowest stimulus intensity. The subjects were instructed to maintain tonic activity in the FDI of 5 or 10% of the maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). The relation between MEP variance and amplitude was found to have an inverted parabolic shape, with maximal variance occurring near the half-maximal MEP amplitude. The coefficient of variation [Formula: see text] of MEPs decreased approximately as a rectangular hyperbolic function of MEP amplitude (i.e. ~ 1/MEP). A probabilistic model is proposed to explain the inverted parabolic relation between MEP variance and MEP amplitude, as well as the sigmoid shape of the MEP input-output relation (i.e. stimulus-response curve). The model is based on a description of α-motoneurons as binary threshold units, with unit thresholds distributed according to a positively skewed probability density function. The units are driven by noisy synaptic input currents having a Gaussian distribution. The model predicts an inverse parabolic relation between MEP variance and amplitude and a sigmoid input-output relation, as experimentally observed. Furthermore, increasing model motoneuron excitability by increasing the background synaptic drive increases MEP variability independently of MEP size, a surprising prediction. The model also explains the approximately rectangular hyperbolic relation between [Formula: see text] and MEP amplitude. The implications of these results for the interpretation of neurophysiological experiments and the statistical analysis of MEPs are discussed.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain stimulation; Input–output curve; MEP variance; Motor-evoked potential (MEP); Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

Year:  2021        PMID: 34324018     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06169-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  19 in total

1.  A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve.

Authors:  A L HODGKIN; A F HUXLEY
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1952-08       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Motor unit recruitment strategies and muscle properties determine the influence of synaptic noise on force steadiness.

Authors:  Jakob L Dideriksen; Francesco Negro; Roger M Enoka; Dario Farina
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Variability of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation depends on muscle activation.

Authors:  Warren G Darling; Steven L Wolf; Andrew J Butler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Neurophysiological methods for studies of the motor system in freely moving human subjects.

Authors:  C Capaday
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1997-06-27       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Input-output properties and gain changes in the human corticospinal pathway.

Authors:  H Devanne; B A Lavoie; C Capaday
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  A method for simulating the reflex output of a motoneuron pool.

Authors:  C Capaday; R B Stein
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Integrated motor cortical control of task-related muscles during pointing in humans.

Authors:  Hervé Devanne; Leonardo G Cohen; Nezha Kouchtir-Devanne; Charles Capaday
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Models of recruitment and rate coding organization in motor-unit pools.

Authors:  A J Fuglevand; D A Winter; A E Patla
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  An investigation of threshold properties among cat spinal alpha-motoneurones.

Authors:  B Gustafsson; M J Pinter
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Studies on the corticospinal control of human walking. I. Responses to focal transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex.

Authors:  C Capaday; B A Lavoie; H Barbeau; C Schneider; M Bonnard
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  1 in total

1.  Short periods of bipolar anodal TDCS induce no instantaneous dose-dependent increase in cerebral blood flow in the targeted human motor cortex.

Authors:  Marie Louise Liu; Anke Ninija Karabanov; Marjolein Piek; Esben Thade Petersen; Axel Thielscher; Hartwig Roman Siebner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.