| Literature DB >> 34322678 |
Pintu Pandit1, Subhankar Maity2, Kunal Singha1, Muhammet Uzun3,4, Mehdihasan Shekh5, Shakeel Ahmed6,7.
Abstract
On the eve of the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a tremendous increase in the production of facemasks across the world. The primary raw materials for the manufacturing of the facemasks are non-biodegradable synthetic polymers derived from petrochemicals. Disposal of these synthetic facemasks increases waste-load in the environment causing severe ecological issues for flora and fauna. The synthesis processes of the polymers from the petrochemical by-products were also not eco-friendly, which releases huge greenhouse and harmful gases. Therefore, many research organizations and entrepreneurs realize the need for biodegradable facemasks to render similar performance as the existing non-biodegradable masks. The conventional textile fabrics made of natural fibers like cotton, flax, hemp, etc., can also be used to prepare facemasks with multiple layers in use for general protection. Such natural textile masks can be made anti-microbial by applying various herbal anti-microbial extracts like turmeric, neem, basil, aloe vera, etc. As porosity is the exclusive feature of the masks for arresting tiny viruses, the filter of the masks should have a pore size in the nanometre scale, and that can be achieved in nanomembrane manufactured by electrospinning technology. This article reviews the various scopes of electrospinning technology for the preparation of nanomembrane biomasks. Besides protecting us from the virus, the biomasks can be useful for skin healing, skincare, auto-fragrance, and organized cooling which are also discussed in this review article.Entities:
Keywords: Biodegradable; Bioextracts; Biomask; Biopolymers; Facemask; Respirator
Year: 2021 PMID: 34322678 PMCID: PMC8297964 DOI: 10.1016/j.clet.2021.100218
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clean Eng Technol
Fig. 1Classification of masks.
Surgical masks standards according to the different countries.
| Country/standards | Particle Filtration Efficiency | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| China: YY0469 | BFE: 3.0 μm (>95%) & PFE: 0.1 μm (>30%) | ||
| USA: ASTM | Level-1 | Level-2 | Level-3 |
| Europe: EN 14683 | Type-1 | Type-2 | Type-3 |
| 3.0 μm (>95%) | 3.0 μm (>98%) | 3.0 μm (>98%) | |
Different types of the Disposable air purifying respirators.
| Disposable APRs | Disposable APRs Rating Letter class | Disposable APRs Rating Number class | Properties & Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| N-series i.e., N95, N99, N100 | N for Not resistant to Oil | 95 means filter the 95% of the 0.3 μm particulates. | Primarily useful in oil-free environments, including aerosols or solid particulates of dust, iron ores, wood, pollen, coal, metal, fluor, and non-oil-based liquids. These masks are widely useful in epidemics caused by viruses, especially N95. Service Life: Until damage or hard to breathe. |
| R-Series i.e., R95 | R for Resistant to Oil | Useful in both solid and liquid particulates having oils. Service Life: 7–8 h. Due to its low life, it is hardly used. | |
| P- series i.e., P95 and P100 | P for Oil Proof | Similar to R-Series respirators. However, P-series respirators have a long service life of approximately 40 h to 30 days. Similar to N-Series respirators, P-series respirators are also useable until damage or breathing resistance. Thus, P-series are mostly valuable than R-series respirators in oil-containing solid or liquid aerosols/particulates. |
Features of RAPRs.
| HFRAPRs | FFRAPRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Face Fitting | Covers the nose, mouth and under the chin | Whole face covers (i.e., eyes, nose, chin, mouth) |
| Advantages | Relatively lightweight Filters the different types of air contaminants | Due to full covering of the face FFRAPRs are most useful in harsh environments Protect the eyes and face from irritating chemicals or vapours. |
| Disadvantages | Depends on types and capacity of cartridge/filters Protection is low compared to FFRAPRs, especially for eye protection. Not appropriate in oxygen-deficient environments. Not Useful in high concentrated contaminants atmosphere. | Heavier then HFARPs Less comfortable Due to the limited efficiency of the filters/cartridges, it is not useful in all types of atmospheres. Even it is difficult to breathing Not useful in oxygen-deficient environments. Needs some extra gadgets or oxygen supplies. |
| Types of Cartridges | HEPA cartridge Organic vapour cartridge Acid gas/mist cartridge Mercury cartridge | Similar type of cartridge is useable as in HFAPRs |
| Applications | Organic vapours Asbestos, radionuclides, silica contaminated environments Mineral acid gases Low level of metallic mercury vapours | Generally, FFAPRs are useful in such environments where eyes and face protection are required |
Properties of Dust masks.
| FFP1 | FFP2 | FFp3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Filtering Capacity | Minimum 80% | Minimum 94% | Minimum 99% |
| Leakage | <22% | <8% | <2% |
| Colour of Mask | No specific colour codes. Depends on companies. | ||
| Elastic colour | Yellow | Blue or white | Red |
| Particle Filtration | Small solid particles (>5 μm) | Powdered Particles (2–5 μm) | Very fine particles (<2 μm) |
| Exhalation Valve | No | Yes | Yes |
| Medical Use | Lung dieses (i.e., Silicosis, anthracosis, asbestosis, sideroses. | Influenza viruses, Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARs), Bacteria of pneumonic plague and tuberculosis | Bacteria, viruses |
| Applications | Mining Industries, Cement industries | Glass industries, Foundry, construction, pharmaceutical and agriculture | Ceramic industries |
Fig. 2Percentage of particles blocked fit test (Robertson, 2020).
Fig. 3High-speed visualization of airflow (Matthew E. Staymates, 2020).
Fig. 4Block mechanism of respiratory droplets (Matthew E. Staymates, 2020).
Fig. 5Particle capture mechanism by facemask (Tebyetekerwa et al., 2020).
Fig. 6Advantages of herbal resources for the conventional face mask.
Fig. 7Scanning electron microscope images of electrospun nanofiber mats collected on different geometries and styles (Tebyetekerwa et al., 2020).