| Literature DB >> 35990792 |
Tido Tiwa Stanislas1,2,3, Ketty Bilba1, Rachel Passos de Oliveira Santos2, Cristel Onésippe-Potiron1, Holmer Savastano Junior2, Marie-Ange Arsène1.
Abstract
The controversy surrounding the transmission of COVID-19 in 2020 has revealed the need to better understand the airborne transmission route of respiratory viruses to establish appropriate strategies to limit their transmission. The effectiveness in protecting against COVID-19 has led to a high demand for face masks. This includes the single-use of non-degradable masks and Filtering Facepiece Respirators by a large proportion of the public, leading to environmental concerns related to waste management. Thus, nanocellulose-based membranes are a promising environmental solution for aerosol filtration due to their biodegradability, renewability, biocompatibility, high specific surface area, non-toxicity, ease of functionalization and worldwide availability. Although the technology for producing high-performance aerosol filter membranes from cellulose-based materials is still in its initial stage, several promising results show the prospects of the use of this kind of materials. This review focuses on the overview of nanocellulose-based filter media, including its processing, desirable characteristics and recent developments regarding filtration, functionalization, biodegradability, and mechanical behavior. The porosity control, surface wettability and surface functional groups resulting from the silylation treatment to improve the filtration capacity of the nanocellulose-based membrane is discussed. Future research trends in this area are planned to develop the air filter media by reinforcing the filter membrane structure of CNF with CNCs. In addition, the integration of sol-gel technology into the production of an air filter can tailor the pore size of the membrane for a viable physical screening solution in future studies.Entities:
Keywords: Aerosol filter membranes; Biodegradability; Filtration performance; Functionalization; Nanocellulose-based membrane; Silylation treatment
Year: 2022 PMID: 35990792 PMCID: PMC9383689 DOI: 10.1007/s10570-022-04792-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cellulose (Lond) ISSN: 0969-0239 Impact factor: 6.123
Fig. 1Phases involved in airborne transmission of respiratory viruses (Wang et al. 2021)
Fig. 2Face mask to reduce airborne transmission of respiratory viruses.
Modified from Prather et al. (2020)
Fig. 3Schematic view of the meltblowing a, electrospinning b and spunbonding c processes (Tuñón-Molina et al. 2021)
Fig. 4Illustration of structure of a surgical face mask (Wibisono et al. 2020) and b N95 respirator (Richardson, 2022) to prevent contagious virus contained in aerosol micro droplets
Materials and type of commercial disposable masks and respirators
| Masks type | Surgical | Respirator | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| type I | type II | type IIR | N95 | KN95 | FFP2 | FFP3 | |
| Standards | EN14686 | NIOSH 42CFR84 | GB2626-2006 | EN149:2001 | EN149:2001 | ||
| Materials/structure | PP non-woven and meltblown fabric | Meltblown fabric, hot air cotton and non-woven fabric | Non-woven meltblown and spunbond fabric; a layer of PP cotton is sometimes included | ||||
| Wearing duration | 4 h | 8 h | |||||
| References | Melayil and Mitra, ( | Forouzandeh et al. ( | (Liao et al. | ||||
Fig. 5Filtration mechanism of conventional nonwoven a microfiber and b nanofibre filter.
Modified from Choi et al. (2021)
Comparison of the standards and classification of different international respirators and filter masks
| Classification | Mask standards (country) | Aerosol filter efficiency | Inhalation resistance (Pa) | Exhalation resistance (Pa) | Flow rate (L/min) | Test agent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N95 | NIOSH-42CFR84 (USA) | 95% | ≤ 343 | ≤ 245 | 85 | NaCl |
| KN95 | GB2626-2006 (China) | 95% | ≤ 350 | ≤ 250 | 85 | NaCl |
| P2 | AS/NZS1716:2012 (Australia and New Zealand) | 94% | ≤ 70 | 30 | NaCl | |
| ≤ 120 | 85 | |||||
| ≤ 240 | 95 | |||||
| FFP2 | EN149-2001 (Europe) | 94% | ≤ 70 | 30 | NaCl + Paraffin oil | |
| ≤ 240 | 95 | |||||
| ≤ 300 | 180 | |||||
| ≤ 500 | ||||||
| Korea 1er Class | Korea KMOEL-2017–64 (Korea) | 94% | ≤ 70 | 30 | NaCl + Paraffin oil | |
| ≤ 240 | 95 | |||||
| ≤ 300 | 180 | |||||
| DS | Japan JMHLW-Notification 214, 2018 (Japan) | 95% | ≤ 70 | 40 | NaCl | |
| ≤ 70 | 85 |
Fig. 6Environmental impact of masks from a non-biodegradable material sources and b biodegradable material sources.
Modified from Choi et al. (2021)
Fig. 7Illustration of a the fate and potential environmental impacts of disposable surgical masks during COVID-19 (Babaahmadi et al. 2021; Xu and Ren 2021), b, c SEM micrographs of the surgical mask taken before and after application of the experimental fragmentation and degradation treatment (Babaahmadi et al. 2021; Saliu et al. 2021)
Biodegradable filter media from biopolymer sources
| Biodegradable media | Materials properties | Structure and materials | Membranes properties | Applications |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cellulose | Biodegradability, biocompatibility, lightweight, durability, and transparency | Cellulose acetate (CA) nanofiber (Ahne et al. | Filtration efficiency of 99.8% and quality factor 0.05 Pa−1 | Air filtration |
| 3-ply cotton-PLA-cotton layered (Patil et al. | ∆p = 35.78 Pa/cm2 and bacterial filtration efficiency of 97.9% | Facemask | ||
| Banana stem fibre (Sen et al. | Bioaerosol barrier properties | Facemask | ||
| Poly (lactic acid) (PLA) | Biodegradable, biocompatible, non-toxic, linear aliphatic thermoplastic polyester, and soluble in organic solvents | 3D printed and electrospun polylactic acid (He et al. | Multi-layer filter as an alternative to KN95/N95 and FFP2 filters | Respirator filter |
| Electrospun PLA-chitosan core–shell nanofibers (Afshar et al. | Broadly distributed, smooth, beadless fibres with a diameter of (671 ± 172) nm | Wound dressing, drug delivery and tissue engineering | ||
| Alginate | Biodegradability, biocompatibility, nontoxic nature and with gelling properties | Electrospun alginate membranes containing ZnO nanoparticles (Dodero et al. | Properties similar to human skin (E = 470 MPa and water vapour permeability of 3.8 × 10–12 g/m Pa s) | Surgical |
| Chitosan-alginate-AgNPs membranes (Venkatesan et al. | Up to 1.5-fold increase in bacterial filtration efficiency by adding AgNPs | Patches and wound dressings | ||
| Chitosan | Biocompatible, biodegradable, binding energy, availability, with antibacterial properties and poor thermal and mechanical properties | Electrospun filter membranes from nanoporous PLA/(chitosan nanoparticles) (H. Li et al. | Filtration efficiency (98. 99%), pressure drop (147.60 Pa) at an air flow rate of 14 cm/s and high antibacterial activity | Antimicrobial aerosol filtration membranes |
| Poly(butylene succinate) nanofibres/ microfibres membrane coated with cationically charged chitosan nanowhiskers (Choi et al. | Permanent ionic charges and low pressure drop | Air filtration media | ||
| Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) | Non-toxic, biodegradable and biocompatible | Nano fibrous structure (Al-Hazeem | High and regular fibre density | Air filtration media |
*∆p: Differential pressure, E: Elastic modulus
Fig. 8Illustration of the steps for the preparation of cellulose nanofibres and cellulose nanocrystals from agricultural biomass and wood sources. Modified from (Amorim et al. 2020; Mohammed et al. 2018; Stanislas et al. 2020)
Comparison between cellulose nanofibres (CNF) and cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) properties
| Cellulose nanofibre (CNF) | Cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) | |
|---|---|---|
| Extraction from pulp fibres | Mechanical disintegration of plant cellulose fibres in an aqueous medium, such as homogenization, extrusion, or grinding | Various mineral acids, such as sulfuric, hydrochloric, and phosphoric acids can be used for the hydrolysis of pulp fibres to produce CNCs |
| Diameter | 5–100 nm | 5–70 nm |
| Length | 0.5–5 µm | 0.1–0.4 µm |
| Crystallinity Index | 60–80% (Mohammed et al. | 80–91% (Kusmono et al. |
| Mechanical properties | Young’s modulus of 100 GPa to 140 GPa and tensile strength of 7500 MPa (Tavakolian et al. | Transverse modulus of elasticity of 82.3 GPa and adhesion capacity of 11.73 nN (Correia et al. |
| Application | Filter membrane barrier for liquid (Sehaqui et al. | Coating of the filter membrane (Bai et al. |
Preparation methods and properties of cellulose nanofibre filter membrane
| Cellulose materials | Preparation methods | Properties and Applications | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fibrillated cellulose (bleached kraft pulps fibres) | Softwood and hardwood (Mao et al. | -Wet beating process to improve the fibrillation of the fibre surface, | The filtration capacity of this filter is comparable to that of commercial N95 synthetic filters. Potential application for respiratory filters |
| -partial freeze-drying | |||
| Softwood (Lu et al. | -Dispersion of the fibrillated celluloses in an aqueous solution containing 0–40% tert-butyl alcohol (TBA), | -TBA allow the separation of the microfibrils as well as the construction of a spider web structure | |
| -freeze-drying process | -Capture efficiency of up to 99.07–99.78% for particles > 300 nm in diameter. Potential application for facemask | ||
| softwood kraft pulp board (Ma et al. | -The fibrillated celluloses were dispersed in different solvents (purified water; water with isopropanol, ethanol or 10% v/v TBA), | The use of an organic solvent as a freezing medium significantly reduces the pore channel, leading to a capture efficiency of 99.66% and 99.70% for 0.3 µm and 0.5 µm particles, respectively, at a flow rate of 32 L. Min−1. Potential application for respirator to capture fine particles | |
| -lyophilisation | |||
| Nanocellulose | CNF prepared from eucalyptus bleached kraft pulp (Sim et al. | -Preparation of CNFs by different mechanical grinding steps, | The freeze-drying method resulted in a CNF filter media with high porosity (up to 95%) and low density compared to air drying methods. Potential application for filtration media, or battery separator |
| -subjecting the suspensions to different drying conditions (freeze-drying, exchange solvent drying and drying at room temperature) | |||
| Cellulose pulp + PET + CNF (Sim and Youn | -Inclusion of a suspension of CNF (10–50%) in the pulp-polypropylene mixture by a wet-forming method, | -The inclusion of CNF improves the tensile strength and reduces the permeability of the membrane | |
| -drying process (freeze-drying and cylinder drying) | -A composite pulp/CNF membrane prepared by freeze drying achieves a particle capture efficiency of 99.944%. Potential application for air filter media | ||
| Cellulose NFC aerogel (Toivonen et al. | -Vacuum filtration of CNF suspension (0.1% consistency), | -Mesoporous (pore diameter 10–30 nm), | |
| -Solvent exchange, | -Highly transparent (transmittance > 90%) CNF aerogel membranes, | ||
| -Drying at room temperature | -Tensile strength of 97 MPa, | ||
| -Modulus of elasticity of 6 GPa | |||
| Potential application for transparent and flexible devices, and gas filtration | |||
| CNF from eucalyptus pulp (Alexandrescu et al. | -Pour the CNF suspension (0.1–0.3%) into Petri dishes (base weight 10 g.m−2), | At the filtration face velocity of 5.3 cm.s−1, the filter membrane containing 0.1% CNF showed a higher quality factor. Potential application for filtration of airborne nanoparticles | |
| -freeze-drying: stirring the solution during the freezing process | |||
| Commercial CNFs (Liu et al. | -A solution of MTMS at pH = 4 is added dropwise to the CNF suspension (water/TBA as solvent) | -Air filter water contact angle of 154.2°, | |
| -The solution is then dried with a freeze dryer, | -Porosity (up to 99.21%), | ||
| -heated for silylation | -Specific surface area (26.54 m2/g), | ||
| -Pressure drop = 42 Pa, | |||
| -Capture efficiency of 99.31% and 99.75% for PM1.0 and PM2.5 particles, respectively). Potential application for breathing masks, indoor air purification, and chimney exhaust | |||
| CNF prepared from softwood bleached pulp (Xiong et al. | -Spray various suspensions of CNFs (varying concentrations, sizes and masses) onto the corrugated paper sheet | The air filter prepared a rapid freezing rate (− 196 °C) from lower concentrations and sizes (0.05 wt%) of CNF was able to self-assemble with well dispersed fibril networks | |
| -Monitor the formation of the self-assembly by a freeze-drying process | -Improvement in PM0.3 capture efficiency from 6 to 95%, while maintaining a relatively low pressure drop (174.2 Pa). Potential application for facemask, industrial protection, and indoor air purification | ||
| CNC and CNF coating on filter paper (Wang et al. | -Aqueous suspensions of CNF and CNC were prepared separately and filtered through filter paper (FP) as a substrate to produce a composite NC/FP membrane | The membrane filter prepared from 0.1% CNF and dried under vacuum at 60 °C showed satisfactory filtration performance (up to the level of an ultrafiltration membrane) with a capture efficiency of 97.14% and a flux of 46.279 L.m2.h−1. Potential application for advanced separation membranes for water purification | |
| -Various drying conditions (solvent, pressure, temperature) were applied | |||
| CNC and CNF coated on polyethersulfone (PES) membrane (Bai et al. | -Soaking the PES membrane in a solution of 75% ethanol and deionized water for 30 min and 24 h respectively | The results show that the CNF and CNC coating improves the anti-fouling properties of the PES membrane and with greater efficiency when using a CNC coating which reduces irreversible and reversible fouling. Potential application for membranes surface coating | |
| -Ultrasonic dispersion of the CNF and CNC solution for 30 min before being loaded onto a PES membrane surface (2, 5 and 10 g/m2) at the pressure of 100 kPa | |||
| Cationic NFC from residual Pulp (Sehaqui et al. | Cationic CNF filter membrane prepared by: | The CNF filter membrane obtained by the freeze-drying method has the highest porosity and robust mechanical stability compared to other drying methods. Potential application for decontamination of water | |
| -papermaking, | |||
| -solvent exchange, | |||
| -supercritical drying, | |||
| -lyophilization process | |||
| Lignin-containing CNF prepared from recycled cardboard (Ukkola et al. | -Deep eutectic solvent pretreatment, | -For all nanoporous membranes, filtration efficiency was > 96% for most particle sizes, with the highest value (99.5%) reported for particles < 360 nm on the membrane prepared with 0.7% of CNF | |
| -Mechanical grinding preparation of lignin-containing CNFs | -The nanoporous membrane composed of 0.3% by weight of CNF meets the requirements of the N95 respirator. Potential application for respirator mask | ||
| - Using two silane agents (MTMS and HDTMS) to prepare the porous membrane with CNF suspensions of 0.2–1.0% by weight, | |||
| -lyophilization process | |||
Fig. 9Illustration of chemical modifications of cellulose fibre by various functional groups.
Modified from French (2017) and Tavakolian et al. (2020)
Properties of some antimicrobial treatments for respirators
| Antimicrobial agent | Microorganism removal | Preparation method | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ag NPs | Bacteria, fungi | Electrochemical | Huy et al. ( |
| CuO NPs | Virus | Surface modification | Borkow et al. ( |
| Cu2O NPs | Bacteria, virus | Chemical reduction | Hang et al. ( |
| Au NPs | Virus | Chemical reduction | Meléndez-Villanueva et al. ( |
| TiO2 | Virus | Sonochemical | Akhtar et al. ( |
| Zn NPs | Virus | Surface modification | Limited ( |
| Citric acid | Virus | Surface modification | GlaxoSmithKline ( |
| Chitosan Nanowhiskers | Bacteria, virus | Surface modification | Choi et al. ( |
*NPs: Nanoparticles
Fig. 10Illustration of the transmission interaction between large droplets carrying nanoparticles and hydrophilic and hydrophobic filter membranes.
Modified from Aydin et al. (2020)
Fig. 11Diagram illustrating the mechanism of action of TBA in preventing hydrogen bonding between microfibrils and the resulting increase in specific surface area. Modified from (Lu et al. 2018)
Comparative performances of cellulose-based air filter membrane
| Reference | Production technology | Filtration capacity | Moisture resistance | Mechanical properties | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FE (%) | ∆ | QF (Pa−1) | ||||
| Ukkola et al. ( | Freeze-drying | 96.50 | 150.0 | 0.0020 | WCA > 150 °C SC-Si = 4.8% | |
| Liu et al. ( | Freeze-drying | 97.96 | 42.0 | 0.1220 | WCA = 152.4 °C | |
| Xiong et al. ( | Spray coating and freeze-drying | 94.6 | 174.2 | 0.0168 | ||
| Lu et al. ( | freeze-drying | 99 | < 450 | Dynamic compressive strength is 0.09–0.39 MPa | ||
| Alexandrescu et al. ( | freeze-drying | 56 | 55 | 0.0149 | ||
| 46 | 25 | 0.0246 | ||||
| Santos et al. ( | Electrospinning | 95.59 | 9.60 | 0.0340 | Tensile strength = 10 MPa and E = 220 MPa | |
where FE: Filtration efficiency, ∆P: Pressure drop, QF: Quality factor, WCA: Water contact angle, SC-Si: Surface concentration of Silicon, E: Elastic modulus