Literature DB >> 31280156

Impact of structural features on dynamic breathing resistance of healthcare face mask.

Bao-Guo Yao1, Yu-Xiao Wang2, Xiang-Yu Ye3, Fei Zhang2, Yun-Liang Peng2.   

Abstract

In order to provide an overall evaluation and characterization of the comfort sensation and performance of face mask related to breathing resistance for healthcare in fog and haze weather, and address the influence of structural features on breathing resistance properties, an experimental set-up was developed, which was able to continuously change the direction and rate of air flow and the breathing frequency to simulate the dynamic breathing process during the actual wearing of face mask. The dynamic changes of airflow rate and the breathing resistance were acquired by a virtual instrument (VI) system and a microelectronics system. Six evaluation indices were defined for the dynamic performance and comfort sensation of face mask, derived from the source data of dynamic breathing resistance. Twelve types of face masks from different department stores with different features such as shape, respiratory valve, brand, main materials and protection level were tested using the experimental set-up. The one-way ANOVA analysis was carried out to identify the significance of the differences of the indices among the test masks. The results showed that each evaluation index was significantly different (P < 0.05) among different test masks. The change rate of breathing resistance could be obtained using the dynamic measurement of breathing resistance and could be applied for the dynamic performance evaluation of face mask compared with the static measurement of breathing resistance under constant airflow rate. The influences of structural features such as respiratory valve, shape and main materials on breathing resistance were evaluated and analyzed. The face masks with respiratory valve had lower change rate of breathing resistance. Moreover, the cup type mask had lower change rate of breathing resistance than the folding mask. Furthermore, the cotton mask had lower change rate of breathing resistance than the nonwoven fabric mask.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Actual wearing; Breathing resistance; Change rate; Dynamic measurement; Evaluation; Respirator

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31280156     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  13 in total

Review 1.  Advances in Facemasks during the COVID-19 Pandemic Era.

Authors:  Mamata Karmacharya; Sumit Kumar; Oleksandra Gulenko; Yoon-Kyoung Cho
Journal:  ACS Appl Bio Mater       Date:  2021-01-14

2.  Can respirator face masks in a developing country reduce exposure to ambient particulate matter?

Authors:  Sasan Faridi; Ramin Nabizadeh Nodehi; Saeed Sadeghian; Masih Tajdini; Mohammad Hoseini; Masud Yunesian; Shahrokh Nazmara; Mohammad Sadegh Hassanvand; Kazem Naddafi
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 5.563

3.  Meltblown fabric vs nanofiber membrane, which is better for fabricating personal protective equipments.

Authors:  Junwei Wu; Hongjia Zhou; Jingyi Zhou; Xiao Zhu; Bowen Zhang; Shasha Feng; Zhaoxiang Zhong; Lingxue Kong; Weihong Xing
Journal:  Chin J Chem Eng       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.171

Review 4.  Disposable face masks and reusable face coverings as non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to prevent transmission of SARS-CoV-2 variants that cause coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Role of new sustainable NPI design innovations and predictive mathematical modelling.

Authors:  Neil J Rowan; Rafael A Moral
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Comparison of filtration efficiency and respiratory resistance of COVID-19 protective masks by multi-national standards.

Authors:  Wenxia Wang; Tingting Chen; Zhen Li; Qiting Tan; Zhenbang Meng; Hailun Qiu; Xujie Liu; Junxia Zheng
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.303

Review 6.  Potential biodegradable face mask to counter environmental impact of Covid-19.

Authors:  Pintu Pandit; Subhankar Maity; Kunal Singha; Muhammet Uzun; Mehdihasan Shekh; Shakeel Ahmed
Journal:  Clean Eng Technol       Date:  2021-07-22

Review 7.  An overview of filtration efficiency through the masks: Mechanisms of the aerosols penetration.

Authors:  A Tcharkhtchi; N Abbasnezhad; M Zarbini Seydani; N Zirak; S Farzaneh; M Shirinbayan
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2020-08-11

Review 8.  The Physiological Impact of Masking Is Insignificant and Should Not Preclude Routine Use During Daily Activities, Exercise, and Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Rebecca H Haraf; Mark A Faghy; Brian Carlin; Richard A Josephson
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.646

9.  Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in COVID 19 Pandemic: Related Symptoms and Adverse Reactions in Healthcare Workers and General Population.

Authors:  Rosa Alessia Battista; Milena Ferraro; Lucia Oriella Piccioni; Giulia Elvira Malzanni; Mario Bussi
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.306

Review 10.  Processing and Quality Control of Masks: A Review.

Authors:  Sedigheh Farzaneh; Mohammadali Shirinbayan
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 4.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.