Literature DB >> 34321954

Source Apportionment of Environmental Combustion Sources using Excitation Emission Matrix Fluorescence Spectroscopy and Machine Learning.

Jay W Rutherford1, Timothy Larson2, Timothy Gould2, Edmund Seto3, Igor V Novosselov4, Jonathan D Posner1,4,5.   

Abstract

The link between particulate matter (PM) air pollution and negative health effects is well-established. Air pollution was estimated to cause 4.9 million deaths in 2017 and PM was responsible for 94% of these deaths. In order to inform effective mitigation strategies in the future, further study of PM and its health effects is important. Here, we present a method for identifying sources of combustion generated PM using excitation-emission matrix (EEM) fluorescence spectroscopy and machine learning (ML) algorithms. PM samples were collected during a health effects exposure assessment panel study in Seattle. We use archived field samples from the exposure study and the associated positive matrix factorization (PMF) source apportionment based on X-ray fluorescence and light absorbing carbon measurements to train convolutional neural network and principal component regression algorithms. We show EEM spectra from cyclohexane extracts of the archived filter samples can be used to accurately apportion mobile and vegetative burning sources but were unable to detect crustal dust, Cl-rich, secondary sulfate and fuel oil sources. The use of this EEM-ML approach may be used to conduct PM exposure studies that include source apportionment of combustion sources.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Excitation Emission Fluorescence Spectroscopy; Machine Learning; Particulate Matter; Source Apportionment

Year:  2021        PMID: 34321954      PMCID: PMC8312701          DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)        ISSN: 1352-2310            Impact factor:   5.755


  20 in total

1.  Fine particulate matter source apportionment following a large woodstove changeout program in Libby, Montana.

Authors:  Tony J Ward; Christopher P Palmer; Curtis W Noonan
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.235

Review 2.  Review of receptor modeling methods for source apportionment.

Authors:  Philip K Hopke
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.235

3.  A controlled inhalation diesel exhaust exposure facility with dynamic feedback control of PM concentration.

Authors:  Timothy Gould; Timothy Larson; James Stewart; Joel D Kaufman; Daniel Slater; Nicholas McEwen
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 4.  Particle transport and deposition: basic physics of particle kinetics.

Authors:  Akira Tsuda; Frank S Henry; James P Butler
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 9.090

5.  Excitation-Emission Matrix Spectroscopy for Analysis of Chemical Composition of Combustion Generated Particulate Matter.

Authors:  Gaurav Mahamuni; Jay Rutherford; Justin Davis; Eric Molnar; Jonathan D Posner; Edmund Seto; Gregory Korshin; Igor Novosselov
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Characterization of Chromophoric Water-Soluble Organic Matter in Urban, Forest, and Marine Aerosols by HR-ToF-AMS Analysis and Excitation-Emission Matrix Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Qingcai Chen; Yuzo Miyazaki; Kimitaka Kawamura; Kiyoshi Matsumoto; Sean Coburn; Rainer Volkamer; Yoko Iwamoto; Sara Kagami; Yange Deng; Shuhei Ogawa; Sathiyamurthi Ramasamy; Shungo Kato; Akira Ida; Yoshizumi Kajii; Michihiro Mochida
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Source apportionment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the urban atmosphere: a comparison of three methods.

Authors:  Randolph K Larsen; Joel E Baker
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 8.  Translating diagnostic assays from the laboratory to the clinic: analytical and clinical metrics for device development and evaluation.

Authors:  Mark D Borysiak; Matthew J Thompson; Jonathan D Posner
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 9.  Black carbon as an additional indicator of the adverse health effects of airborne particles compared with PM10 and PM2.5.

Authors:  Nicole A H Janssen; Gerard Hoek; Milena Simic-Lawson; Paul Fischer; Leendert van Bree; Harry ten Brink; Menno Keuken; Richard W Atkinson; H Ross Anderson; Bert Brunekreef; Flemming R Cassee
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Associations of PM₂.₅ constituents and sources with hospital admissions: analysis of four counties in Connecticut and Massachusetts (USA) for persons ≥ 65 years of age.

Authors:  Michelle L Bell; Keita Ebisu; Brian P Leaderer; Janneane F Gent; Hyung Joo Lee; Petros Koutrakis; Yun Wang; Francesca Dominici; Roger D Peng
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.