| Literature DB >> 34321601 |
Chaojie Yang1,2, Brian Hallmark3, Jin Choul Chai4, Timothy D O'Connor5, Lindsay M Reynolds6, Alexis C Wood7, Michael Seeds8, Yii-Der Ida Chen9, Lyn M Steffen10, Michael Y Tsai11, Robert C Kaplan4,12, Martha L Daviglus13, Lawrence J Mandarino14, Amanda M Fretts15, Rozenn N Lemaitre16, Dawn K Coletta14,17, Sarah A Blomquist18, Laurel M Johnstone19, Chandra Tontsch18, Qibin Qi4, Ingo Ruczinski20, Stephen S Rich1, Rasika A Mathias21, Floyd H Chilton18, Ani Manichaikul22.
Abstract
Long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC-PUFAs) have critical signaling roles that regulate dyslipidemia and inflammation. Genetic variation in the FADS gene cluster accounts for a large portion of interindividual differences in circulating and tissue levels of LC-PUFAs, with the genotypes most strongly predictive of low LC-PUFA levels at strikingly higher frequencies in Amerind ancestry populations. In this study, we examined relationships between genetic ancestry and FADS variation in 1102 Hispanic American participants from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. We demonstrate strong negative associations between Amerind genetic ancestry and LC-PUFA levels. The FADS rs174537 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) accounted for much of the AI ancestry effect on LC-PUFAs, especially for low levels of n-3 LC-PUFAs. Rs174537 was also strongly associated with several metabolic, inflammatory and anthropomorphic traits including circulating triglycerides (TGs) and E-selectin in MESA Hispanics. Our study demonstrates that Amerind ancestry provides a useful and readily available tool to identify individuals most likely to have FADS-related n-3 LC-PUFA deficiencies and associated cardiovascular risk.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34321601 PMCID: PMC8319323 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-021-02431-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Commun Biol ISSN: 2399-3642
Participant characteristics for individuals of self-identified Hispanic origin from the MESA cohort.
| Characteristics | Self-reported Hispanic country/region of origin | Total ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cuba ( | Dominican ( | Puerto Rico ( | South Amer. ( | Central Amer. ( | Mexico ( | ||
| Sex (Female) | 42.2% | 53.1% | 52.7% | 54.8% | 58.8% | 48.3% | 50.6% |
| Age (years) | 69.8 (9.1) | 58.8 (10.1) | 59.3 (9.4) | 62.9 (10.3) | 58.7 (8.1) | 61.8 (10.2) | 61.2 (10.1) |
| Study Site: Columbia University | 73.33% | 99.31% | 86.24% | 60.22% | 20% | 0.54% | 35.93% |
| Study Site: University of Minnesota | 15.56% | 0.69% | 11.37% | 15.05% | 13.75% | 38.98% | 24.95% |
| Study Site: UCLA | 11.11% | 0 | 2.39% | 24.73% | 66.25% | 60.48% | 39.12% |
| Height (cm) | 163.1 (9.7) | 163.3 (9.4) | 162.6 (9.3) | 160.4 (8.9) | 159.6 (9.2) | 161.7 (9.5) | 161.8 (9.4) |
| Weight (kg) | 75.3 (13.9) | 75.4 (14.3) | 79.5 (17.4) | 71.4 (12.3) | 74.9 (15.3) | 77.7 (15.8) | 76.8 (15.6) |
| Waist-to-hip ratio | 0.98 (0.06) | 0.93 (0.08) | 0.94 (0.08) | 0.94 (0.07) | 0.96 (0.06) | 0.97 (0.07) | 0.96 (0.07) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 28.3 (5.3) | 28.2 (4.6) | 29.9 (5.7) | 27.7 (4.1) | 29.3 (5.2) | 29.6 (5.2) | 29.3 (5.1) |
| HDL-C (mg/dl) | 49.8 (18.1) | 47.2 (10.7) | 49.7 (14.2) | 50.8 (13.9) | 48.0 (12.1) | 45.9 (12.5) | 47.4 (13.0) |
| LDL-C (mg/dl) | 121.1 (26.1) | 124.7 (35.5) | 118.0 (33.3) | 115.8 (29.6) | 120.9 (38.3) | 119.4 (32.8) | 119.8 (33.2) |
| Triglycerides (mg/dl) | 154.2 (100.4) | 132.9 (69.9) | 134.4 (72.1) | 151.5 (168.8) | 144.1 (75.5) | 173.6 (113.4) | 157.5 (107.6) |
| s-ICAM (ng/ml) | 311.7 (71.8) | 262.4 (88.2) | 307.6(110.6) | 276.4 (72.3) | 286.6 (69.4) | 298.7 (80.6) | 293.2 (86.2) |
| E-Selectin (ng/ml) | 64.05 (32.8) | 54.15 (17.9) | 63.65 (27.4) | 57.96 (29.8) | 62.74 (26.1) | 67.07 (29.3) | 63.06 (27.4) |
| Fish intake (servings/day) | 0.19 (0.28) | 0.21 (0.22) | 0.21 (0.25) | 0.20 (0.28) | 0.22 (0.23) | 0.15 (0.21) | 0.18 (0.23) |
| EPA (% of total fatty acids) | 0.90 (0.55) | 0.87 (0.68) | 0.76 (0.55) | 0.72 (0.43) | 0.58 (0.38) | 0.52 (0.29) | 0.64 (0.46) |
| DPA (% of total fatty acids) | 0.98 (0.24) | 0.95 (0.26) | 0.90 (0.20) | 0.89 (0.22) | 0.83 (0.18) | 0.84 (0.19) | 0.88 (0.21) |
| DHA (% of total fatty acids) | 3.71 (1.51) | 4.15 (1.31) | 3.58 (1.23) | 3.76 (1.25) | 3.24 (1.15) | 2.69 (0.90) | 3.19 (1.23) |
| ARA (% of total fatty acids) | 12.18 (2.58) | 12.84 (2.52) | 12.00 (2.65) | 10.53 (2.26) | 11.04 (2.40) | 10.64 (2.36) | 11.22 (2.56) |
| Global Proportion of Amerind ancestry | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.33 | 0.39 | 0.41 | 0.30 |
| Global Proportion of African ancestry | 0.19 | 0.41 | 0.23 | 0.09 | 0.16 | 0.04 | 0.14 |
| Global Proportion of European ancestry | 0.75 | 0.53 | 0.65 | 0.58 | 0.45 | 0.55 | 0.56 |
| rs174537 frequency* of effect allele T (versus G allele) | 0.28‘ | 0.27 | 0.40 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.51 |
Phenotypic descriptive statistics are presented as percentages for dichotomous variables and mean (standard deviation) for continuous variables.
*For comparison, the rs174537 effect allele frequencies were 0.007, 0.328, and 0.858 in the 1000 Genomes AFR, EUR and AMR populations, respectively, where the allele frequency calculation was restricted to the cleaned set of samples that were included in the reference set for local ancestry analysis (see Supplementary Methods for details).
Fig. 1Relationship of LC-PUFA levels with global proportion of Amerind ancestry before and after adjustment for rs174537 genotype.
The regression effect estimates ( expressed as % of total fatty acids) and P-values are shown in the upper right corner of each panel. The relationship of LC-PUFA levels with Global Proportion of Amerind Ancestry as estimated from genome-wide SNP data is shown for a EPA—raw, b EPA—genotype-adjusted, c DHA—raw, d DHA—genotyped-adjusted, e ARA—raw, and f ARA—genotype-adjusted. Here, the rs174537 genotype-adjusted LC-PUFA levels were obtained as residuals after regression against rs174537 genotype and re-centered around the raw means. P-values are calculated using a two-sided t-test for the regression coefficient derived with n = 1102 biologically independent samples.
Fig. 2Relationship of triglycerides with global proportion of Amerind ancestry before and after adjustment for rs174537 genotype.
The regression effect estimates ( in mg/dL) and P-values are shown in the upper right corner of each panel. The relationships are shown for each of a raw triglyceride levels, and b genotype-adjusted tryglyceride levels with Global Proportion of Amerind Ancestry. Here, rs174537 genotype-adjusted triglyceride levels were obtained as residuals from regression accounting for rs174537 genotype, and re-centered around the raw means. P-values are calculated using a two-sided t-test for the regression coefficient derived with n = 1101 biologically independent samples.
Fig. 3Genotypic effects of rs174537 on triglycerides and E-selectin.
The mean and standard deviation are shown for a triglycerides, and b E-selectin stratified by rs174537 genotypes. The estimated effect and standard error among participants carrying one or two copies of the ancestral allele T (compared to the reference of zero), after covariate adjustment for age and sex are shown for c triglycerides, and d E-selectin. Numbers of independent samples for the analyses presented are 1101 (GG: 293;GT: 483;TT: 325) for triglycerides and 183 (GG: 48; GT: 76; TT: 59) for E-selectin. Source data for the figure are provided in Supplementary Data 1.
Genotypic effects of rs174537 on fasting lipids, anthropometrics and inflammatory traits.
| Beta | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fasting lipids | Triglycerides (mg/dL) | GT | 21.27 | 0.0001 |
| TT | 29.94 | 1.01 × 10−06 | ||
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | GT | −1.30 | 0.141 | |
| TT | −2.48 | 0.010 | ||
| Anthropometrics | waist-hip ratio | GT | 0.006 | 0.152 |
| TT | 0.013 | 8.94 × 10−03 | ||
| Height (cm) | GT | −1.36 | 0.002 | |
| TT | −3.46 | 6.59 × 10−12 | ||
| Weight (kg) | GT | −1.89 | 0.077 | |
| TT | −3.12 | 7.48 × 10−03 | ||
| BMI (kg/m2) | GT | −0.25 | 0.50 | |
| TT | −0.002 | 0.99 | ||
| Inflammatory | s-ICAM (ng/mL) | GT | 30.64 | 0.002 |
| TT | 26.09 | 0.018 | ||
| E-Selectin (ng/mL) | GT | 10.00 | 0.048 | |
| TT | 11.50 | 0.032 |
Regression analysis results for the effect of rs174537 genotype on fasting lipids, anthropometrics and inflammatory with adjustment for age and sex. For the effect sizes, the effects of GT and TT are in reference to GG. The sample size is 1102 (GG: 293; GT: 484; TT: 325) for waist-hip ratio; height; weight and BMI, 1101 (GG: 293;GT: 483;TT: 325) for triglycerides and HDL-C, 439 (GG: 112; GT: 194; TT: 133) for s-ICAM and 183 (GG: 48; GT: 76; TT: 59) for E-Selectin. P-values are calculated using two-sided t test for the regression coefficient.