Literature DB >> 34316715

Characterization of a RAD51C-silenced high-grade serous ovarian cancer model during development of PARP inhibitor resistance.

Rachel M Hurley1, Cordelia D McGehee1, Ksenija Nesic2, Cristina Correia1, Taylor M Weiskittel1, Rebecca L Kelly1, Annapoorna Venkatachalam1, Xiaonan Hou3, Nicholas M Pathoulas4, X Wei Meng1, Olga Kondrashova2, Marc R Radke5, Paula A Schneider4, Karen S Flatten4, Kevin L Peterson4, Marc A Becker3, Ee Ming Wong6, Melissa S Southey6, Alexander Dobrovic7, Kevin K Lin8, Thomas C Harding8, Iain McNeish9, Christian A Ross10, Jill M Wagner3, Matthew J Wakefield2, Clare L Scott2, Paul Haluska3, Andrea E Wahner Hendrickson3, Larry M Karnitz1, Elizabeth M Swisher5, Hu Li1, S John Weroha3, Scott H Kaufmann1.   

Abstract

Acquired PARP inhibitor (PARPi) resistance in BRCA1- or BRCA2-mutant ovarian cancer often results from secondary mutations that restore expression of functional protein. RAD51C is a less commonly studied ovarian cancer susceptibility gene whose promoter is sometimes methylated, leading to homologous recombination (HR) deficiency and PARPi sensitivity. For this study, the PARPi-sensitive patient-derived ovarian cancer xenograft PH039, which lacks HR gene mutations but harbors RAD51C promoter methylation, was selected for PARPi resistance by cyclical niraparib treatment in vivo. PH039 acquired PARPi resistance by the third treatment cycle and grew through subsequent treatment with either niraparib or rucaparib. Transcriptional profiling throughout the course of resistance development showed widespread pathway level changes along with a marked increase in RAD51C mRNA, which reflected loss of RAD51C promoter methylation. Analysis of ovarian cancer samples from the ARIEL2 Part 1 clinical trial of rucaparib monotherapy likewise indicated an association between loss of RAD51C methylation prior to on-study biopsy and limited response. Interestingly, the PARPi resistant PH039 model remained platinum sensitive. Collectively, these results not only indicate that PARPi treatment pressure can reverse RAD51C methylation and restore RAD51C expression, but also provide a model for studying the clinical observation that PARPi and platinum sensitivity are sometimes dissociated.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of NAR Cancer.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34316715      PMCID: PMC8271218          DOI: 10.1093/narcan/zcab028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NAR Cancer        ISSN: 2632-8674


  84 in total

1.  XPC Lys939Gln polymorphism is associated with the decreased response to platinum based chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Xiao-Li Zhu; Xin-Chen Sun; Bao-An Chen; Ning Sun; Hong-Yan Cheng; Fan Li; Hong-Ming Zhang; Ji-Feng Feng; Shu-Kui Qin; Lu Cheng; Zu-Hong Lu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.628

2.  Prospective assessment of XPD Lys751Gln and XRCC1 Arg399Gln single nucleotide polymorphisms in lung cancer.

Authors:  Daniela F Giachino; Paolo Ghio; Silvia Regazzoni; Giorgia Mandrile; Silvia Novello; Giovanni Selvaggi; Dario Gregori; Mario DeMarchi; Giorgio V Scagliotti
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  RAD51 paralogs: roles in DNA damage signalling, recombinational repair and tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Natsuko Suwaki; Kerstin Klare; Madalena Tarsounas
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 7.727

4.  Promoter hypermethylation and BRCA1 inactivation in sporadic breast and ovarian tumors.

Authors:  M Esteller; J M Silva; G Dominguez; F Bonilla; X Matias-Guiu; E Lerma; E Bussaglia; J Prat; I C Harkes; E A Repasky; E Gabrielson; M Schutte; S B Baylin; J G Herman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-04-05       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  BRCA mutation frequency and patterns of treatment response in BRCA mutation-positive women with ovarian cancer: a report from the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  Kathryn Alsop; Sian Fereday; Cliff Meldrum; Anna deFazio; Catherine Emmanuel; Joshy George; Alexander Dobrovic; Michael J Birrer; Penelope M Webb; Colin Stewart; Michael Friedlander; Stephen Fox; David Bowtell; Gillian Mitchell
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  In vivo anti-tumor activity of the PARP inhibitor niraparib in homologous recombination deficient and proficient ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Mariam M AlHilli; Marc A Becker; S John Weroha; Karen S Flatten; Rachel M Hurley; Maria I Harrell; Ann L Oberg; Matt J Maurer; Kieran M Hawthorne; Xiaonan Hou; Sean C Harrington; Sarah McKinstry; X Wei Meng; Keith M Wilcoxen; Kimberly R Kalli; Elizabeth M Swisher; Scott H Kaufmann; Paul Haluska
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 7.  Mechanisms of resistance to therapies targeting BRCA-mutant cancers.

Authors:  Christopher J Lord; Alan Ashworth
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  Clinical characteristics of ovarian cancer classified by BRCA1, BRCA2, and RAD51C status.

Authors:  J M Cunningham; M S Cicek; N B Larson; J Davila; C Wang; M C Larson; H Song; E M Dicks; P Harrington; M Wick; B J Winterhoff; H Hamidi; G E Konecny; J Chien; M Bibikova; J-B Fan; K R Kalli; N M Lindor; B L Fridley; P P D Pharoah; E L Goode
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  AmiGO: online access to ontology and annotation data.

Authors:  Seth Carbon; Amelia Ireland; Christopher J Mungall; ShengQiang Shu; Brad Marshall; Suzanna Lewis
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  BRCA1 promoter methylation in peripheral blood DNA of mutation negative familial breast cancer patients with a BRCA1 tumour phenotype.

Authors:  Cameron Snell; Michael Krypuy; Ee Ming Wong; Maurice B Loughrey; Alexander Dobrovic
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Landscape of PARP Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms and Clues to Overcome Resistance.

Authors:  Satoru Kyo; Kosuke Kanno; Masahiro Takakura; Hitomi Yamashita; Masako Ishikawa; Tomoka Ishibashi; Seiya Sato; Kentaro Nakayama
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 2.  Preventing and Overcoming Resistance to PARP Inhibitors: A Focus on the Clinical Landscape.

Authors:  Rosario Prados-Carvajal; Elsa Irving; Natalia Lukashchuk; Josep V Forment
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 3.  Opinion: PARP inhibitors in cancer-what do we still need to know?

Authors:  Andrew J Wicks; Dragomir B Krastev; Stephen J Pettitt; Andrew N J Tutt; Christopher J Lord
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 4.  Targeting Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Ovarian Cancer with PARP Inhibitors: Synthetic Lethal Strategies That Impact Overall Survival.

Authors:  Tao Xie; Kristie-Ann Dickson; Christine Yee; Yue Ma; Caroline E Ford; Nikola A Bowden; Deborah J Marsh
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 5.  PARP Inhibitors and Myeloid Neoplasms: A Double-Edged Sword.

Authors:  Clifford M Csizmar; Antoine N Saliba; Elizabeth M Swisher; Scott H Kaufmann
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 6.  DNA Damage Repair: Predictor of Platinum Efficacy in Ovarian Cancer?

Authors:  Dimitra T Stefanou; Vassilis L Souliotis; Roubini Zakopoulou; Michalis Liontos; Aristotelis Bamias
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-12-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.