Mariam M AlHilli1, Marc A Becker2, S John Weroha3, Karen S Flatten2, Rachel M Hurley2, Maria I Harrell4, Ann L Oberg5, Matt J Maurer5, Kieran M Hawthorne5, Xiaonan Hou2, Sean C Harrington2, Sarah McKinstry2, X Wei Meng2, Keith M Wilcoxen6, Kimberly R Kalli2, Elizabeth M Swisher4, Scott H Kaufmann7, Paul Haluska7. 1. Division of Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States. 2. Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States. 3. Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States. Electronic address: Weroha.Saravut@mayo.edu. 4. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States. 5. Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States. 6. TesaroBio, Inc, Waltham, MA, United States. 7. Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States; Department of Molecular Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have yielded encouraging responses in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSOCs), but the optimal treatment setting remains unknown. We assessed the effect of niraparib on HGSOC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models as well as the relationship between certain markers of homologous recombination (HR) status, including BRCA1/2 mutations and formation of RAD51 foci after DNA damage, and response of these PDXs to niraparib in vivo. METHODS: Massively parallel sequencing was performed on HGSOCs to identify mutations contributing to HR deficiency. HR pathway integrity was assessed using fluorescence microscopy-based RAD51 focus formation assays. Effects of niraparib (MK-4827) on treatment-naïve PDX tumor growth as monotherapy, in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel, and as maintenance therapy were assessed by transabdominal ultrasound. Niraparib responses were correlated with changes in levels of poly(ADP-ribose), PARP1, and repair proteins by western blotting. RESULTS: Five PDX models were evaluated in vivo. Tumor regressions were induced by single-agent niraparib in one of two PDX models with deleterious BRCA2 mutations and in a PDX with RAD51C promoter methylation. Diminished formation of RAD51 foci failed to predict response, but Artemis loss was associated with resistance. Niraparib generally failed to enhance responses to carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy, but maintenance niraparib therapy delayed progression in a BRCA2-deficient PDX. CONCLUSIONS: Mutations in HR genes are neither necessary nor sufficient to predict response to niraparib. Assessment of repair status through multiple complementary assays is needed to guide PARP inhibitor therapy, design future clinical trials and identify ovarian cancer patients most likely to benefit from PARP inhibition.
OBJECTIVE:Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have yielded encouraging responses in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSOCs), but the optimal treatment setting remains unknown. We assessed the effect of niraparib on HGSOC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models as well as the relationship between certain markers of homologous recombination (HR) status, including BRCA1/2 mutations and formation of RAD51 foci after DNA damage, and response of these PDXs to niraparib in vivo. METHODS: Massively parallel sequencing was performed on HGSOCs to identify mutations contributing to HR deficiency. HR pathway integrity was assessed using fluorescence microscopy-based RAD51 focus formation assays. Effects of niraparib (MK-4827) on treatment-naïve PDX tumor growth as monotherapy, in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel, and as maintenance therapy were assessed by transabdominal ultrasound. Niraparib responses were correlated with changes in levels of poly(ADP-ribose), PARP1, and repair proteins by western blotting. RESULTS: Five PDX models were evaluated in vivo. Tumor regressions were induced by single-agent niraparib in one of two PDX models with deleterious BRCA2 mutations and in a PDX with RAD51C promoter methylation. Diminished formation of RAD51 foci failed to predict response, but Artemis loss was associated with resistance. Niraparib generally failed to enhance responses to carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy, but maintenance niraparib therapy delayed progression in a BRCA2-deficient PDX. CONCLUSIONS: Mutations in HR genes are neither necessary nor sufficient to predict response to niraparib. Assessment of repair status through multiple complementary assays is needed to guide PARP inhibitor therapy, design future clinical trials and identify ovarian cancerpatients most likely to benefit from PARP inhibition.
Authors: M Esteller; J M Silva; G Dominguez; F Bonilla; X Matias-Guiu; E Lerma; E Bussaglia; J Prat; I C Harkes; E A Repasky; E Gabrielson; M Schutte; S B Baylin; J G Herman Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-04-05 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Y Ben David; A Chetrit; G Hirsh-Yechezkel; E Friedman; B D Beck; U Beller; G Ben-Baruch; A Fishman; H Levavi; F Lubin; J Menczer; B Piura; J P Struewing; B Modan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-01-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Shahneen K Sandhu; William R Schelman; George Wilding; Victor Moreno; Richard D Baird; Susana Miranda; Lucy Hylands; Ruth Riisnaes; Martin Forster; Aurelius Omlin; Nathan Kreischer; Khin Thway; Heidrun Gevensleben; Linda Sun; John Loughney; Manash Chatterjee; Carlo Toniatti; Christopher L Carpenter; Robert Iannone; Stan B Kaye; Johann S de Bono; Robert M Wenham Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-06-28 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Nuala McCabe; Nicholas C Turner; Christopher J Lord; Katarzyna Kluzek; Aneta Bialkowska; Sally Swift; Sabrina Giavara; Mark J O'Connor; Andrew N Tutt; Małgorzata Z Zdzienicka; Graeme C M Smith; Alan Ashworth Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-08-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Dalibor Blazek; Jiri Kohoutek; Koen Bartholomeeusen; Eric Johansen; Petra Hulinkova; Zeping Luo; Peter Cimermancic; Jernej Ule; B Matija Peterlin Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2011-10-15 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: V Abkevich; K M Timms; B T Hennessy; J Potter; M S Carey; L A Meyer; K Smith-McCune; R Broaddus; K H Lu; J Chen; T V Tran; D Williams; D Iliev; S Jammulapati; L M FitzGerald; T Krivak; J A DeLoia; A Gutin; G B Mills; J S Lanchbury Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2012-10-09 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Sarah J Hill; Brennan Decker; Emma A Roberts; Neil S Horowitz; Michael G Muto; Michael J Worley; Colleen M Feltmate; Marisa R Nucci; Elizabeth M Swisher; Huy Nguyen; Chunyu Yang; Ryuji Morizane; Bose S Kochupurakkal; Khanh T Do; Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos; Joyce F Liu; Joseph V Bonventre; Ursula A Matulonis; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Ross S Berkowitz; Christopher P Crum; Alan D D'Andrea Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2018-09-13 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Jason P W Carey; Cansu Karakas; Tuyen Bui; Xian Chen; Smruthi Vijayaraghavan; Yang Zhao; Jing Wang; Keith Mikule; Jennifer K Litton; Kelly K Hunt; Khandan Keyomarsi Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Rachel M Hurley; Andrea E Wahner Hendrickson; Daniel W Visscher; Peter Ansell; Maria I Harrell; Jill M Wagner; Vivian Negron; Krista M Goergen; Matthew J Maurer; Ann L Oberg; X Wei Meng; Karen S Flatten; Maja J A De Jonge; Carla D Van Herpen; Jourik A Gietema; Rutger H T Koornstra; Agnes Jager; Martha W den Hollander; Matthew Dudley; Stacie P Shepherd; Elizabeth M Swisher; Scott H Kaufmann Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2019-01-25 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Rachel M Hurley; Cordelia D McGehee; Ksenija Nesic; Cristina Correia; Taylor M Weiskittel; Rebecca L Kelly; Annapoorna Venkatachalam; Xiaonan Hou; Nicholas M Pathoulas; X Wei Meng; Olga Kondrashova; Marc R Radke; Paula A Schneider; Karen S Flatten; Kevin L Peterson; Marc A Becker; Ee Ming Wong; Melissa S Southey; Alexander Dobrovic; Kevin K Lin; Thomas C Harding; Iain McNeish; Christian A Ross; Jill M Wagner; Matthew J Wakefield; Clare L Scott; Paul Haluska; Andrea E Wahner Hendrickson; Larry M Karnitz; Elizabeth M Swisher; Hu Li; S John Weroha; Scott H Kaufmann Journal: NAR Cancer Date: 2021-07-09