Literature DB >> 34315770

Diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen tests in asymptomatic and presymptomatic close contacts of individuals with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection: cross sectional study.

Ewoud Schuit1,2, Irene K Veldhuijzen3, Roderick P Venekamp1, Wouter van den Bijllaardt4, Suzan D Pas4,5, Esther B Lodder6, Richard Molenkamp7, Corine H GeurtsvanKessel7, Jans Velzing7, Robin C Huisman7, Lieke Brouwer8, Timo L Boelsums8, Gregorius J Sips3,8, Kimberly S M Benschop3, Lotty Hooft1,2, Janneke H H M van de Wijgert1,9, Susan van den Hof3, Karel G M Moons10,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic test accuracy of two rapid antigen tests in asymptomatic and presymptomatic close contacts of people with SARS-CoV-2 infection on day 5 after exposure.
DESIGN: Prospective cross sectional study.
SETTING: Four public health service covid-19 test sites in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 4274 consecutively included close contacts (identified through test-and-trace programme or contact tracing app) aged 16 years or older and asymptomatic for covid-19 when requesting a test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of Veritor System (Beckton Dickinson) and Biosensor (Roche Diagnostics) rapid antigen tests, with reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing as reference standard. The viral load cut-off above which 95% of people with a positive RT-PCR test result were virus culture positive was used as a proxy of infectiousness.
RESULTS: Of 2678 participants tested with Veritor, 233 (8.7%) had a RT-PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection of whom 149 were also detected by the rapid antigen test (sensitivity 63.9%, 95% confidence interval 57.4% to 70.1%). Of 1596 participants tested with Biosensor, 132 (8.3%) had a RT-PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection of whom 83 were detected by the rapid antigen test (sensitivity 62.9%, 54.0% to 71.1%). In those who were still asymptomatic at the time of sampling, sensitivity was 58.7% (51.1% to 66.0%) for Veritor (n=2317) and 59.4% (49.2% to 69.1%) for Biosensor (n=1414), and in those who developed symptoms were 84.2% (68.7% to 94.0%; n=219) for Veritor and 73.3% (54.1% to 87.7%; n=158) for Biosensor. When a viral load cut-off was applied for infectiouness (≥5.2 log10 SARS-CoV-2 E gene copies/mL), the overall sensitivity was 90.1% (84.2% to 94.4%) for Veritor and 86.8% (78.1% to 93.0%) for Biosensor, and 88.1% (80.5% to 93.5%) for Veritor and 85.1% (74.3% to 92.6%) for Biosensor, among those who remained asymptomatic throughout. Specificities were >99%, and positive and negative predictive values were >90% and >95%, for both rapid antigen tests in all analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivities of both rapid antigen tests in asymptomatic and presymptomatic close contacts tested on day 5 onwards after close contact with an index case were more than 60%, increasing to more than 85% after a viral load cut-off was applied as a proxy for infectiousness. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34315770     DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n1676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  25 in total

Review 1.  Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Authors:  Jacqueline Dinnes; Pawana Sharma; Sarah Berhane; Susanna S van Wyk; Nicholas Nyaaba; Julie Domen; Melissa Taylor; Jane Cunningham; Clare Davenport; Sabine Dittrich; Devy Emperador; Lotty Hooft; Mariska Mg Leeflang; Matthew Df McInnes; René Spijker; Jan Y Verbakel; Yemisi Takwoingi; Sian Taylor-Phillips; Ann Van den Bruel; Jonathan J Deeks
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-07-22

2.  Guidelines for COVID-19 Laboratory Testing for Emergency Departments From the New Diagnostic Technology Team of the Taiwan Society of Emergency Medicine.

Authors:  Chien-Chang Lee; Yi-Tzu Lee; Chih-Hung Wang; I-Min Chiu; Weide Tsai; Yan-Ren Lin; Chih-Huang Li; Chin Wang Hsu; Pei-Fang Lai; Jiann-Hwa Chen; Jeffrey Che-Hung Tsai; Shih-Hung Tsai; Chorng-Kuang How
Journal:  J Acute Med       Date:  2022-06-01

Review 3.  Performance of Antigen Detection Tests for SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Anastasia Tapari; Georgia G Braliou; Maria Papaefthimiou; Helen Mavriki; Panagiota I Kontou; Georgios K Nikolopoulos; Pantelis G Bagos
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-04

4.  Limitations of Molecular and Antigen Test Performance for SARS-CoV-2 in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic COVID-19 Contacts.

Authors:  Matthew L Robinson; Agha Mirza; Nicholas Gallagher; Alec Boudreau; Lydia Garcia Jacinto; Tong Yu; Julie Norton; Chun Huai Luo; Abigail Conte; Ruifeng Zhou; Kim Kafka; Justin Hardick; David D McManus; Laura L Gibson; Andrew Pekosz; Heba H Mostafa; Yukari C Manabe
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 11.677

5.  Rapid antigen testing by community health workers for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Dhaka, Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ayesha Sania; Ahmed Nawsher Alam; A S M Alamgir; Joanna Andrecka; Eric Brum; Fergus Chadwick; Tasnuva Chowdhury; Zakiul Hasan; Davina L Hill; Farzana Khan; Mikolaj Kundegorski; Seonjoo Lee; Mahbubur Rahman; Yael K Rayport; Tahmina Shirin; Motahara Tasneem; Katie Hampson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.006

6.  Accuracy of rapid point-of-care antigen-based diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression analyzing influencing factors.

Authors:  Lukas E Brümmer; Stephan Katzenschlager; Sean McGrath; Stephani Schmitz; Mary Gaeddert; Christian Erdmann; Marc Bota; Maurizio Grilli; Jan Larmann; Markus A Weigand; Nira R Pollock; Aurélien Macé; Berra Erkosar; Sergio Carmona; Jilian A Sacks; Stefano Ongarello; Claudia M Denkinger
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 11.613

7.  Benefits, risks, and cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 self-tests from a consumer's perspective.

Authors:  Afschin Gandjour
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  SARS-CoV-2 Detection Using Optical Fiber Based Sensor Method.

Authors:  Muhammad Usman Hadi; Menal Khurshid
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Accuracy of novel antigen rapid diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2: A living systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lukas E Brümmer; Stephan Katzenschlager; Mary Gaeddert; Christian Erdmann; Stephani Schmitz; Marc Bota; Maurizio Grilli; Jan Larmann; Markus A Weigand; Nira R Pollock; Aurélien Macé; Sergio Carmona; Stefano Ongarello; Jilian A Sacks; Claudia M Denkinger
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 10.  Performance of Rapid Antigen Tests for COVID-19 Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Muhammad Fazli Khalid; Kasturi Selvam; Alfeq Jazree Nashru Jeffry; Mohamad Fazrul Salmi; Mohamad Ahmad Najib; Mohd Noor Norhayati; Ismail Aziah
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.